Were permanently founded multi-story Super Slides retail equipment or construction structures?

Short answer They were structures and improvements to realty. The erector was a construction contractor that consumed the metal framework, sheet-steel slides, stairs, cement, and other materials.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 190.1000
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1968-01-02
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A representative of a contractor erecting and transferring Super Slide structures (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1968. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1968
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This January 2, 1968 Tax Counsel letter concerns several-story amusement slides erected on concrete foundations and permanently affixed under franchise contracts transferring title and operating rights. The December 29 telephone conversation and the enclosed copy of former Ruling 11 are not reproduced in the official PDF. The classification depended on structural construction and permanent realty attachment under former Board Ruling 11. Portable or differently founded attractions require their own current-law analysis.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The described Super Slides were structures and improvements to realty. They consisted of multi-story metal-tube frameworks, sheet-steel slides, and metal stairs erected on concrete foundations and permanently affixed to the site.

The franchise form did not turn them into retail equipment. Erecting the structures was a construction contract, and the contractor consumed the cement, sheet metal, framework, and other components as materials.

Tax was measured by the contractor's cost of those materials.

Common questions

Were the slides machinery and equipment?

No. The letter treated the completed slides as structures.

Was the erector a construction contractor?

Yes.

What was the contractor's tax measure?

Its cost of the materials used to erect the structures.

Citations and references

  • Former California Sales and Use Tax Ruling 11 — contractor, construction-contract, and materials treatment quoted and applied; identified as enclosed, but the separate copy is not reproduced in the official PDF
  • December 29, 1967 telephone conversation — erection and transfer of the Super Slide structures discussed

Source

Original ruling text

190.1000

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
January 2, 1968
--- --- ----- --- ----- --- --Dear Mr. ---:
This is in regard to our telephone conversation of December 29, 1967, concerning the application of sales tax with respect to the erecting and transfer of structures called Super Slides. It is our understanding that your client is in the business of erecting Super Slides. These are structures several stories high consisting of a framework of metal tubing, with sheet steel slides running from the top of the structure to the bottom and metal stairs. There are erected on concrete foundations and are permanently affixed to the realty. Your client erects and transfers these structures under “franchise” contracts, which provide that the franchisee receives title to the structure and the exclusive right to operate it within a designated geographical area. As indicated in sales and use taxes ruling 11, copy enclosed, “contractors” are consumers of materials used by them in fulfilling construction contracts and tax applies to the sale of such materials to them. The term “construction contract” includes a contract for erecting a structure on land and includes lump-sum and time-and-material contracts. The term “materials” means tangible personal property which when combined with other tangible personal property loses its identity as such and becomes an integral part of the completed structure. Materials includes cement, flooring, piping, and sheet metal. From the information which you have submitted, it appears that the Super Slides are structures and their components, as described, constitute materials under ruling 11. Accordingly, it is our opinion that your client, in erecting such structures, is a construction contractor, and as the consumer of the materials comprising such structures, is liable for tax measured by his cost of such materials. Very truly yours,

George A. Trigueros
Tax Counsel
GAT:smk
Enclosure

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1968. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace