Were bank ATMs tangible personal property or construction fixtures for California sales-and-use-tax purposes?

Short answer Free-standing and countertop ATMs were tangible personal property; ATMs built into a wall or structure were fixtures governed by construction-contract rules.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 190.0070
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1998-03-16
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Board program-planning manager

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1998. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1998
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This March 16, 1998 internal memorandum classified ATMs under Regulation 1521 and compared that result with 1997 property-tax Board actions. It did not analyze a specific sale or installation contract. Unit design, wall or structure modifications, attachment, contract responsibility, furnishing versus installation, later regulatory changes, and current law control. The source's reference to an October 28, 1977 meeting appears in context to mean 1997; this page does not silently correct the original text.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California staff classified free-standing and countertop automated teller machines as tangible personal property. Tax applied to a retailer's gross receipts, and contracts to furnish and install those units were not construction contracts.

ATMs built into the wall of a building or other structure were fixtures. Contracts to furnish and install those units were construction contracts, with tax determined under Regulation 1521.

Staff said this sales-and-use-tax treatment was consistent with the Board's property-tax classification, which likewise distinguished stand-alone units from ATMs housed in a specially built or extensively modified structure.

Common questions

Was a free-standing ATM a fixture?

No.

Was a wall-built ATM a fixture?

Yes.

Did installation automatically make every ATM a construction contract?

No. The unit's structure and placement controlled.

Citations and references

  • California Code of Regulations, title 18, section 1521 — tangible-property versus fixture classification applied
  • California Code of Regulations, title 18, section 122.5 — property-tax fixture rule discussed for consistency

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization
Legal Division-MIC: 82

Memorandum

To:

Mr. Dennis Fox
Program Planning Manager (MIC:92)

From:

Gary J. Jugum
Assistant Chief Counsel

Subject:

Bank ATM’s

Date: March 16, 1998

I am responding to your memorandum of January 23, 1998 concerning the taxation of bank automated teller machines (ATMs) for sales and use tax purposes. You ask for clarification in view of actions taken by the Board for property tax purposes. You state: “During 1997 the Board took various actions on Property Tax Rule 122.5, ‘Fixtures,’ regarding ATMs for property tax purposes. In February 1997, they voted to classify ATMs as personal property. In June and October 1997, they clarified the status of ATMs classifying them as either fixtures or personal property depending on how the ATMs were structured or installed. At the October 28, 1977 meeting, the Board voted to classify ATMs as personal property if installed as a free-standing or counter-top unit within a building; or, fixtures if the ATM was installed in a structure built primarily for the ATM or installed through the wall of a building designed or extensively modified for the specific purpose of housing an ATM.” You ask that we clarify how ATMs should be classified under the Sales and Use Tax Law. Pursuant to Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1521, free-standing or counter-top ATMs are tangible personal property, and tax applies to the gross receipts from a retailer's sale of such ATMs. Contracts to furnish and install such units are not construction contracts. However, ATMs which are built into the wall of a building or other structure are classified as “fixtures” under Regulation 1521. Contracts to furnish and install such units are construction contracts. Tax applies to the sales of such “fixtures” as specified in that regulation.

Mr. Dennis Fox

2

March 16, 1998
190.0070

The application of Regulation 1521 to ATMs reaches a result for sales and use tax purposes which is consistent with the result reached by the Board in its classification of ATMs for property tax law purposes. This memorandum should be annotated forthwith.

SJ:rz
cc:

Sales and Use Tax Attorneys

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1998. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace