Were outdoor advertising signs structures or fixtures, and could a lessor issue a resale certificate?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1987. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A large outdoor advertising sign erected on land was a structure. The installer consumed the lumber and other materials, tax applied to those purchases, and the installer's construction-contract receipts were not taxable.
A sign attached to a building was a fixture. The 1964 letter originally said the installer could not accept a bank lessor's exemption or resale certificate because affixation converted the property to realty before the bank's later lease.
An incorporated August 19, 1987 correction narrows that historical statement: a resale certificate may be accepted from a lessor when the conditions in Regulation 1521(b)(2)(B)(3) are satisfied.
Common questions
How were freestanding ground signs classified?
As structures made from materials consumed by the contractor.
How were building-attached signs classified?
As fixtures.
Could a bank or other lessor issue a resale certificate?
Yes, when the regulation's specified lessor conditions are met under the 1987 correction.
Citations and references
- California Code of Regulations, title 18, section 1521(b)(2)(B)(3) — lessor resale-certificate conditions identified by the 1987 correction
- Former Board Ruling 11 — structure, materials, and fixture classifications applied in the 1964 letter
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/190-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/190-0560.pdf
Original ruling text
190.0560
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
November 17, 1964
K--- S--- C---, Inc.
XXXXX --- Highway
--- ---, California
Attention: Mr. M. G---
Gentlemen:
This is in reply to your letter of October 25, 1964 stating that you have built, constructed and installed outdoor advertising signs for the Bank --- ---, which intends to lease the signs. You enclose a copy of an exemption certificate which has been furnished to you by the bank. These exemption certificates by banks are, in effect, resale certificates and when tangible personal property is sold to banks and the bank issues such a certificate, you may accept such a certificate and the bank then becomes liable for payment of the tax due with respect to the transfer of the property by the bank to its customer. It appears, however, from the statement that you have “built, constructed and installed outdoor advertising signs” you may be acting as a construction contractor with respect to these signs. The usual large outdoor advertising sign which is erected upon land is regarded as a structure, and the person erecting these signs in place is considered to be the consumer under sales and use tax ruling 11, copy enclosed, of the materials out of which he fabricates and erects these signs. This means that sales tax applies with respect to the sale to the installer of the lumber or other materials entering into the signs. No tax applies to the contractor’s receipts from performing the contract and there would, therefore, be no occasion to request or accept an exemption certificate from a bank or any other customer. As ruling 11 indicates, some signs, particularly those attached to buildings, are regarded as “fixtures.” Fixtures when attached to real property by the supplier of the fixtures are considered as sold for use and not for resale, because upon being affixed they become real property and the subsequent transfer whether by lease or sale by the bank would not be a transfer of tangible
K--- S--- C---, Inc
Re: SC- --- - XXXXX
-2-
November 17, 1964
190.0560
personal property. Therefore, as to this type of sign, it would be improper to accept an exemption certificate. If we have not fully understood the type of sign involved, or any other details of the transaction, please advise and we shall attempt to give you a further reply. Very truly yours,
E. H. Stetson
Tax Counsel
EHS:fb
Enclosure
cc:
Pasadena – District Administrator
A resale certificate could now be
accepted from a lessor under the
conditions in Reg. 1521(b)(2)(B)(3).
8/19/87
D.J.H.
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1987. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace