Did a nonprofit foundation qualify for the charitable-sales exemption when its wine auction raised money for worthy charities?

Short answer No. The foundation raised funds rather than directly relieving poverty or selling principally to assist financially distressed purchasers.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 165.0030
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1993-09-09
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Counsel for a nonprofit foundation sponsoring a wine auction

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1993
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is one of two separately published annotation PDFs preserving the same September 9, 1993 wine-auction opinion; Annotation 165.0005 presents the companion full-price issue. The letter applied historical section 6375 conditions to the foundation's purpose and purchasers. The official PDF prints the Market Street Railway citation with the year 1953 and parallel citation 290 PO.2d 201; the source text remains preserved below, while 137 Cal.App.2d 87 resolves to the 1955 case. It is not a ruling issued to another fundraiser, and current organization activities, beneficiaries, purchasers, auction terms, transactions, and law control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The nonprofit foundation did not qualify for the section 6375 charitable-sales exemption merely because its wine auction raised money for worthy charities.

The foundation was a fundraiser rather than an organization directly engaged in relieving poverty and distress. Its auction sales also were not made principally as assistance to buyers or donees in distressed financial condition.

Because those conditions failed, the wine sales were taxable. The opinion measured tax by the full winning auction price, not just the program's stated normal retail value.

Common questions

Did section 501(c)(3) status establish the sales exemption?

No. The foundation had to meet the separate California charitable-sales conditions.

Was benefiting another charity enough?

No. Raising funds for a worthy beneficiary did not make the foundation itself directly engaged in the required relief activity.

Who were the auction sales helping?

The purchasers were bidders, not financially distressed people receiving property as assistance.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 214 and 6375 and Regulation 1570(a) — welfare and charitable-sales exemption conditions applied
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6051 — general sales-tax rule applied
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6091 — presumption that gross receipts are taxable referenced
  • Regulation 1597 — listed-organization exemptions considered and rejected
  • Market Street Railway Co. v. California State Board of Equalization (1953 as printed), 137 Cal.App.2d 87, 96 [290 PO.2d 201 as printed] — statutory basis required for an exemption; the reporter citation resolves to the 1955 case
  • Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1974) 39 Cal.App.3d 765, 769 [114 Cal.Rptr. 571] — taxpayer's burden to establish an exemption
  • State Board of Equalization Pamphlet No. 18, “Volunteer and Nonprofit Fundraising Organizations” — cited as previously supplied with Regulations 1570 and 1597

Source

Original ruling text

165.0030

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

WILLIAM M. BENNETT
First District, Kentfield

1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 324-3828

BRAD SHERMAN
Second District, Los Angeles
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
MATTHEW K. FONG
Fourth District, Los Angeles

September 9, 1993

GRAY DAVIS
Controller, Sacramento

BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director

Mr. [H]
[D]
XX --- ----- ---, CA XXXXX-XXXX
Re:

[No Permit Number]
[W]
Sales Tax on Meals

Dear Mr. [H]:
I am answering your letter to Assistant Chief Counsel Gary J. Jugum of July 1, 1993. Your client, [W], has requested an opinion on the application of sales tax to a wine auction it will hold to benefit the [M]. I.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND
You describe the factual background as follows:
“Through its [W] Foundation [“the Foundation”], our client ... is the primary sponsor of an annual Championship. The Foundation is a non-profit charitable organization qualified under Section 501(c)(3) off the Internal Revenue Code. The championship is a fundraiser for worthy charities. Currently, the funds raised are being transferred to the [M]. “A wine auction is held in conjunction with the championship. The auctioneer tells the audience that the proceeds will go to the [M]. The program lists the normal retail value of the wines. The audience is encouraged to place bids in excess of the value of the wine as a charitable contribution. For federal and state income tax purposes, amounts paid in excess of the normal retail value are considered to be deductible charitable contributions. We believe that this also should apply for purposes of determining the sales tax.”

Mr. [H]

-2-

September 9, 1993
165.0030

Apparently, no tickets were sold to gain admittance to the auction. You set forth your argument for an exemption from sales tax for the sales made at this auction as follows: “The bidders were aware of the value of the wine. Their sole purpose in placing bids in excess of this value was to make a donation to a worthy cause. Since the retail values were stated in the program, we believe that the amounts bid in excess of the retail value were charitable contributions, not part of the sales price. Therefore, the measure of sale tax should be the retail value listed in the program rather than the winning bid.” OPINION A.

Sales and Use Tax Generally.

In California, except where specifically exempted by statute, Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6051 imposes an excise tax, computed as a percentage of gross receipts, upon all retailers for the privilege of selling tangible personal property at retail in this state. (Unless otherwise stated, all statutory references are to the Revenue and Taxation Code.) “[I]t shall the presumed that all gross receipts are subject to tax until the contrary is established. The burden of proving that a sale of tangible personal property is not a sale at retail is upon the person who makes the sale ...” (§ 6091.) “Exemptions from taxation must be found in the statute.” (Market St. Ry. Co. v. Cal. St. Bd. of Equal. (1953) 137 Cal.App.2d 87, 96 [290 PO.2d 201.]) The taxpayer has the burden of showing that he clearly comes within the exemption.” (Standard Oil Co. v. St. Bd. of Equalization (1974) 39 Cal.App.3d 765, 769 [114 Cal.Rptr. 571].) B.

Tax Consequences to [W].

There is no general exemption from sales tax for sales for the benefit of a non-profit organization. Certain restricted exemptions and partial exemptions are found in the statutes interpreted and implemented in Regulations 1570 and 1597. Since the Foundation is not any one of the organizations listed in Regulation 1597, the only exemption that could apply is found in Regulation 1570 which, in sub-division (a), sets out the four conditions that Section 6375 requires to be present before sales by charitable organizations are exempt from tax: “(1) The organization must be formed and operated for charitable purposes and must qualify for the 'welfare exemption' provided by Section 214. “(2) The organization must be engaged in the relief of poverty and distress. “(3) The organization's sales or donations must be made principally as a matter of assistance to the purchasers or donees in distressed financial condition.

Mr. [H]

-3-

September 9, 1993
165.0030

“(4) The property sold or donated must have been made, prepared, assembled, or manufactured by the organization.” The Foundation is a fundraiser. It is not engaged in the relief of poverty or distress and does not make sales principally as a matter of assistance to the purchasers or donees in distressed financial condition. It thus does not qualify as a “charitable organization” for sales and use tax purposes. As a result, its sales at the wine auction are subject to tax measured by the full price at which they are sold-i.e., the auction price. We previously sent you with a copy of Pamphlet No. 18, “Volunteer and Nonprofit Fundraising Organizations,” which contains copies of Regulations 1570 and 1597. I hope the above discussion has answered your question. If you need anything further, please do not hesitate to write again. Sincerely,

John L. Waid
Tax Counsel
JLW:es
cc:

Mr. [E]
[W]
XXXX --- -----, California XXXXX

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1993. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace