Was an in-place sale of a central cooling and ice-storage facility subject to sales or use tax?

Short answer No. Because neither seller nor buyer would remove any part of the integrated facility from the realty, the transfer was subject to neither sales nor use tax. The source said tax was due only during construction.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 150.0551
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1991-04-23
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A tax-services vice president requesting advice for the facility seller and buyer (identities redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1991
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This April 23, 1991 assistant-chief-counsel letter addresses a specifically described central cooling and ice-storage system integrated throughout an office, hotel, retail, parking, and transit project. The result assumes no seller or buyer removal of any component and that applicable tax was paid on construction materials and components. Current law and different facts may change the result. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A development partnership was constructing a central cooling and ice-storage facility inside a large mixed-use project's underground parking structure. Tanks, pumps, valves, piping, refrigeration equipment, and an integrated distribution system would make ice at night and provide chilled water during the day.

The seller built and installed the facility on its own behalf and said it paid applicable sales and use taxes on construction components and materials. It planned to sell the completed operating facility and related rights to a buyer better suited to run it.

Neither party contemplated removing the facility or any part of it from the realty. Applying Regulation 1596(a), counsel concluded that the in-place transaction was subject to neither sales tax nor use tax.

The letter said the only tax due was the tax paid at the time of construction.

Common questions

Did the buyer's separate ownership of the facility create a taxable equipment sale?

No. On the described facts, the integrated facility remained in place as part of the realty.

What fact drove the no-tax transfer result?

Neither seller nor buyer contemplated removing any facility component.

Was all tax avoided?

No. The source said applicable tax had been paid during construction and that this was the tax due.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1596(a) (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

150.0551

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-3723

April 23, 1991

Mr. D--- A. T---, EA
Vice President, Tax Services
T--- M--- G--XXXX --- Court
--- ---, CA XXXXX-XXXX
Re:

Sale of Central Cooling Plant,
A--- P---, --- ---

Dear Mr.T---:
This is in response to your letter of April 19, 1991.
On behalf of your clients, S--- D--- T--- A--- (hereinafter “Seller”) and the S--- D--- C--C--- Company (hereinafter “Buyer”), you have requested our opinion as to the application of the sales tax to the sale in place of a complete central cooling and ice storage facility. We understand that on November 9, 1989 S--- D--- T--- A--- was formed as a limited partnership of S--- L--- Corporation and G--- A--- B--- to develop and construct the A--- P--project. This project is to consist of a 34-story, 660,000 square foot, office tower, a four-level underground parking facility, a 13-story, 297 room Guest Quarters Suite Hotel, retail space, and a trolley station terminal. Collectively this project is named A--- P--- (hereinafter “The Project”). Within the underground parking structure, which is the foundation for the buildings of The Project, a central cooling facility, is being constructed which will provide chilled water for air conditioning purposes. The ice storage will provide a significant savings to the end users or consumers by avoiding the costly on-peak rates during the day to provide air conditioning throughout the project. The major components of the facility are six (eight?) cylindrical tanks stacked three high through the four levels of the underground parking structure of The Project. These tanks house expandable plastic water bottles which react to cooling chemicals to convert 123,500 gallons of water into 515 tons of ice on a daily basis. Water is converted to ice each night by using low cost off-peak electricity. In the day time, when traditional air conditioning systems must use more expensive power, a cooling solution will circulate through the ice, become chilled, and provide cool

Mr. D--- A. T---, EA

-2-

April 23, 1991
150.0551

air for distribution through the system. This ice product provides cool liquid for air conditioning of The Project through the integrated building distribution system. In addition to the tanks, the garage will house cooling equipment, various pumps, valves, distribution piping, and refrigeration equipment required to circulate, generate, and distribute the chilled coolant throughout The Project. These components will be located throughout the underground parking structure. A majority of the facility’s output will be utilized by The Project through the integrated building distribution system. However, if this sale is to occur between Buyer and Seller, all excess tons of water generated will pass through rerouted pipes located under downtown -- --- City streets to another central chiller facility for distribution to its various customers in the --- --- --Redevelopment District, i.e., R---’s, M---’s, O--- H---. The construction costs for erecting and installing the central cooling facility with The Project are not detailed on a separate turnkey or time and material contract. The Project construction manager is S--- S---, Inc., with M. H. G--- as the general contractor for the buildings and underground parking structures. S--- D--- T--- A--- is constructing and installing the facility on their own behalf. In conforming with the Sales and Use Tax Law, S--- D--- T--- A--- paid all applicable sales and use taxes on all components and materials in the construction of the facility. On approximately December 1, 1991 considering startup testing and operation is achieved (In-Service Date of Facility is estimated at November 1, 1991), The Seller, a Limited Partnership under the laws of the State of California, Tax I.D. #XX-XXXXXXX, will sell its interest in the central cooling facility with all power sales agreements and rights to the Buyer, a corporation under the laws of the State of California. It is Seller’s opinion that Buyer is more qualified to maintain and operate facility, since they presently own and operate an existing cooling facility nearby. Both Buyer and Seller do not presently have in their possession a sales tax permit or resale identification numbers, as they are not sellers of tangible personal property. Under our Regulation 1596, “Buildings and Other Property Affixed to Realty,” paragraph (a): Any sale of buildings or minerals or the like affixed to land is taxable as a sale of personal property if, pursuant to the contract or agreement of the sale, the buildings or minerals or the like are to be severed by the seller thereof. If, pursuant to the contract or agreement of sale, such buildings or minerals or the like are to be severed by the purchase thereof, such a transfer is not taxable as a sale of personal property.

Mr. D--- A. T---, EA

-3-

April 23, 1991
150.0551

Here there is no contemplation that Seller or Buyer will remove the facility, or any portion of the facility, from the realty. Accordingly, it is our opinion that the transaction in question is subject to neither sales tax nor use tax. The only tax due was the tax paid at the time of construction. Very truly yours,

Gary J. Jugum
Assistant Chief Counsel

GJJ:sr
cc:

Mr. D--- Q--S--- D--- C--- C--- Company
XXX Northeast ---, Suite XXX
---, OR XXXXX-XXXX
Mr. E--- B--O--- P--- R--XXX West ---, Suite XXXX
--- ---, CA XXXXX

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1991. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace