Could a horse-boarding ranch buy hay for resale when it charged one flat fee for boarding and feed?

Short answer No. California treated the ranch as consuming hay in its bundled boarding service, unless it clearly made a separate retail sale of feed.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 110.0800
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1965-08-09
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A seller asking how tax applied to feed furnished by a horse-boarding ranch for a flat monthly charge

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1965. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1965
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization counsel letter dated August 9, 1965, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It addresses a flat boarding charge that included hay and distinguishes bundled consumption from a clear retail feed sale. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding and should check current horse-boarding, feed, bundled-service, resale-certificate, breeding-stock, exemption-certificate, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A horse-boarding ranch that charged one flat monthly amount for all boarding services, including hay, consumed the hay in providing the service. It did not clearly resell the feed and therefore could not buy that hay with a resale certificate or feed-exemption certificate.

Because horses ordinarily are not human-food animals, the feed exemption was limited here to breeding stock used to produce foals sold in the regular course of business. If a livery operator clearly made a retail sale of feed, it could buy that feed for resale; the customer could furnish a feed-exemption certificate only when the breeding stock produced foals for regular-course sale.

Citations and references

  • No specific statute or regulation was cited in the published letter.

Source

Original ruling text

110.0800

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

August 9, 1965

--- --- ----- --- -----, --- XXXXX
Gentlemen:
This is in reply to your letter of May 12 in which you inquire about the application of the Sales and Use Tax Law to the sale of feed to a horse boarding ranch which boards breeding stock owned by other persons, who are billed once a month for a flat amount. The flat boarding fee includes all the boarding services including the hay consumed by the horses. Under these circumstances, it is our opinion that the horse boarding ranch does not clearly retail the feed to its customers. Rather, the ranch consumes the necessary amount of hay expended in providing the total service. Accordingly, it should not purchase the feed under a resale certificate or a feed exemption certificate. Since horses are not animal life of a kind the product of which ordinarily constitute food for human consumption, the feed exemption certificate will only apply to feed purchased for breeding stock used to produce foals which are sold in the regular course of his business. In the instance in which the livery man clearly retails feed to his customers, he may also buy that feed under a resale certificate; the customers may, in turn, supply the livery man with a feed exemption certificate only if the product (foals) are sold in the regular course of business. Such customers should not use the feed exemption certificate when their breeding stock are not used to produce foals which are then sold in the regular course of business. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to write to us again. Very truly yours,

Philip R. Dougherty
Assistant Counsel

PRD:dse

[lb]

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1965. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace