Was liquid oxygen used to aerate densely stocked fish ponds exempt as a drug or medicine?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1997. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A fish producer added liquid oxygen to ponds because the density of fish was too high for them to obtain enough oxygen naturally.
The oxygen purchases were taxable. Counsel concluded that liquid oxygen used for this purpose was not a drug or medicine under section 6358.4 because it was not used to prevent or control disease.
The memorandum used the statute rather than then-pending amendments to Regulation 1587, which had not yet received approval.
Citations and references
- California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6358.4 (as cited)
- California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1587 (as discussed)
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/110-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/110-0710.pdf
Original ruling text
State of California
Board of Equalization
Legal Division-MIC: 82
Memorandum
110.0710
To :
Mr. Vic Anderson
Supv. Aud. Eval. & Plan. Sec.
(MIC:40)
From :
John L. Waid
Senior Tax Counsel
Subject:
Date: November 19, 1997
Telephone: (916) 324-3828
CalNet 454-3828
S--- S--- F--- California LLC
[No Permit Number]
Liquid Oxygen to Aerate Water
I am responding to your memorandum to Assistant Chief Counsel Gary J. Jugum in which you asked him to review a draft letter written by Senior Tax Auditor James C. Kuhl to the taxpayer. S--- S--- F--- (“S---”) raises fish to be sold to the food service industry. Since the density of fish in its ponds is too great for them to get enough oxygen from the water naturally, S--- buys liquid oxygen and adds it to the water. S--- argues that its purchase of the oxygen is exempt from tax under Regulation 1587. As the amendments to Regulation 1587 to incorporate the recent statutory changes have not yet been approved by OAL, the proper analysis is under the applicable statute, Section 6358.4 (Stats. 1995, Ch. 694), rather than the regulation. We do agree with Mr. Kuhl’s conclusion that sales of liquid oxygen for this purpose are subject to tax, because liquid oxygen is not a “drug” or “medicine” under Section 6358.4 as it is not used for the prevention or control of disease.
JLW:sr
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1997. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace