Is artwork sold to a client for reproducing on software packaging taxable in California, and is the packaging itself exempt?

Short answer The artwork was taxable because the client used it to reproduce an image, but the nonreturnable software packaging was exempt when sold for packing goods that would be resold.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 100.0305
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1993-05-27
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A corporation asking about advertising-agency charges (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1993
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization Senior Tax Counsel letter dated May 27, 1993, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It addresses artwork, packaging, mailers, book production, and resale certificates under the stated facts and historical regulations. Another taxpayer should not treat this staff opinion as binding and should check current advertising-art, container, publishing, and resale rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An advertising agency developed artwork that its client would give to a printer to reproduce on packaging for software sold at retail. The Board's tax counsel separated the artwork from the finished packaging.

The artwork sale was taxable. The client used the artwork to reproduce its image rather than reselling the artwork itself. The printer's sale of nonreturnable software packaging, however, qualified for the container exemption because the client would put its product in the packaging and sell the product together with that packaging.

The answer changed when the agency kept the artwork for its own use and contracted only to sell the packaging. On that assumption, the agency did not sell artwork to the client, and its sale of the qualifying packaging was exempt.

The same letter also said artwork transferred for an advertising mailer and artwork supplied for a book layout were taxable. Printing the books was a nontaxable sale for resale when supported by a resale certificate.

What this means for you

Advertising agencies and graphic artists

Separate what you transfer to the client from what you use internally. Artwork delivered for the client's reproduction or advertising use was treated as a taxable retail sale.

Software sellers and other product businesses

Qualifying nonreturnable packaging can be exempt even when the artwork used to design it is taxable. The client must place goods in the container and sell them together.

Accountants and tax professionals

Document each transaction separately. The opinion distinguishes artwork, finished containers, printed books, and the seller's internal production inputs rather than treating an entire project as one tax category.

Common questions

Q: Was the artwork for software packaging taxable?

A: Yes. The client used it to reproduce the image on packaging, so it was not purchased for resale.

Q: Was the printer's sale of the software packaging taxable?

A: No, under the stated facts. It was a qualifying nonreturnable container sold to a person who would fill it and sell it with the contents.

Q: What if the agency keeps the artwork and sells only the packaging?

A: The letter assumed the agency used the artwork itself and sold no artwork to the client. On that assumption, the qualifying packaging sale was exempt.

Q: Did a seller's permit alone make the artwork a resale purchase?

A: No. The treatment depended on the property's actual use and, where appropriate, a resale certificate taken in good faith.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6051 and 6364(a)
  • California Civil Code § 1656.1
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulations 1540(b)(4)(B), 1540(c), 1543(b)(3)(A), 1589(b)(1)(A), and 1668(d)

Source

Original ruling text

100.0305

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

MEMBER
First District

450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-6450

BRAD SHERMAN
Second District, Los Angeles
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
MATTHEW K. FONG
Fourth District, Los Angeles

May 27, 1993

GRAY DAVIS
Controller, Sacramento

BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director

Ms. K--- V--A--- S--- Corporation
XXXX --- ----- ---, CA XXXXX
SR -- XX-XXXXXX
Dear Ms. V---:
This is in reply to your April 5, 1993 letter regarding the application of sales tax to charges by an advertising agency. You posed the following questions and asked that we assume, in each case, the client holds a valid seller’s permit. “1) An ad agency develops artwork for a client that will be used to package software for resale. The client gives the artwork to the printer to produce the packaging. Is the artwork taxable? Is the packaging taxable?” The client may purchase for resale only the tangible personal property which the client sells prior to use. Since the sale of the artwork is for the client’s use in reproducing the image on the packaging, the sale of the artwork is subject to sales tax. (Sales and Use Tax Reg. 1540, Advertising Agencies, Commercial Artists and Designers, subd. (b)(4)(B).) There is a specific exemption from sales tax for the sale of nonreturnable containers when sold without the contents to persons who place the contents in the container and sell the contents with the container. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6364, subd. (a).) That would be the case with the printer’s sale of the software packaging. Enclosed is a copy of Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1589, Containers and Labels, for your further information. See subdivision (b)(1)(A) of the regulation. “2) An ad agency provides artwork to the printer who produces the packaging, returns it to the agency who bills the client the total price for the packaging. What is taxable, what is not?”

Ms. K--- V---

-2-

May 27, 1993
100.0305

We assume that the advertising agency only prepares the artwork for its own use and contracts with the customer only to sell the packaging. In other words, we assume the advertising agency does not sell the artwork to the client. In that case, the agency’s sale of the packaging is exempt as discussed above. “3) A graphic artist provides artwork for a mailer a client will use to advertise their product. Is the artwork taxable?” Yes, the sale of the artwork is taxable. (Sales and Use Tax Reg. 1540, subds. (c) and (b)(4)(B).) “4) An ad agency provides artwork for a mailer a client will use to advertise their product. Is the artwork taxable?” Yes, the sale of the artwork is taxable. (Sales and Use Tax. Reg. 1540, subd. (b)(4)(B).) “5) A graphic artist does the layout of a book manuscript and provides the artwork to the client who sends it to a book binder. The book will be resold. Is the artwork taxable? Is the cost of printing the book taxable?” The sale of the artwork is taxable. (Sales and Use Tax Reg. 1540, subds. (c) and (b)(4)(B); Sales and Use Tax Reg. 1543, Publishers, subd. (b)(3)(A).) The sale of the printing of the book is a nontaxable sale for resale. The client should issue a resale certificate to the bookbinder. (Sales and Use Tax Reg. 1668, Resale Certificates). “6) A client and ad agency differ on their interpretation of the taxability of a charge. If the client provides a valid resale number, should the agency charge sales tax anyway? If the client withholds the tax payment charged by the ad agency, who is then responsible for the potential sales tax liability if the ad agency is audited?” As noted as subdivision (d) of Regulation 1668, if the client insists that it is buying for resale tangible personal property of a kind not normally resold in the client’s business, the advertising agency should require the client to provide a resale certificate containing a statement that the specific property is being purchased for resale in the regular course of business. In that case, if the advertising agency takes the certificate in good faith, the certificate relieves the advertising agency from the liability for the sales tax.

Ms. K--- V---

-3-

May 27, 1993
100.0305

In the absence of a resale certificate taken in good faith from the client, the retailer remains liable for the sales tax. The sales tax is imposed upon the retailer for the privilege of selling tangible personal property at retail. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) Whether or not the retailer collects reimbursement for the tax from the purchaser is a matter of contract between the retailer and the purchaser. (Civil Code § 1656.1.) We hope this answers your questions; however, if you need further information, feel free to write again. Very truly yours,

Ronald L. Dick
Senior Tax Counsel
RLD:sr

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1993. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace