How did California tax a designer's mechanical art, rejected preliminary designs, and printing aids sold through another agency?

Short answer Time spent on rejected designs was nontaxable only when the designer resigned, retained every design, and transferred no property; a final product could be sold for resale, but special printing aids were generally taxable unless specifically bought for resale.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 100.0145
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1992-06-30
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A CPA writing about an unidentified graphic designer client

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1992
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization Senior Tax Counsel letter dated June 30, 1992, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It applies stated assumptions to an unidentified designer's mechanical-art workflow, ownership clause, rejected concepts, resale sales, and printing aids. The letter expressly says legal-staff opinions are not formal rulings and that the unidentified designer could not rely on it under section 6596. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A designer produced mechanical artwork for brochures, packages, data sheets, flyers, and letterhead. She also bought photography, illustrations, type output, film processing, supplies, color separations, and sometimes printing. Her contract purported to transfer title to client purchases before she used them.

Tax counsel addressed two proposed nontaxable situations. First, when no preliminary design was selected, the time charge was nontaxable only under the assumption that the designer resigned, kept title and possession of every design, and transferred no tangible property to the client.

Second, the designer could accept a resale certificate for the final product sold through an advertising agency or another design firm. But photography, illustrations, and similar special printing aids were generally taxable retail sales even if the final product itself was sold for resale or was nontaxable.

If the agency insisted it was buying a specific printing aid for resale, the designer could require a certificate stating that the identified property was purchased for resale in the regular course of business.

The requester asked for a formal ruling. Counsel answered that legal-staff opinions were not rulings, and because the designer had not been identified, she could not rely on the letter under Revenue and Taxation Code section 6596.

What this means for you

Graphic designers

A charge for an abandoned concept is not automatically nontaxable. The answer here depended on the designer retaining every design and transferring no tangible property.

Advertising agencies and design firms

A resale certificate for the final deliverable does not automatically cover photography, illustrations, or other special printing aids acquired along the way.

Accountants and tax professionals

Review each property category and the exact certificate language. The opinion distinguishes the final mechanical product from project inputs even when all appear on one invoice.

Common questions

Q: Was time spent on an unselected design taxable?

A: Not under the stated assumption that the designer resigned, retained title and possession, and transferred no tangible property.

Q: Could final mechanical art be sold to another agency for resale?

A: Yes, the designer could accept a resale certificate for a final product that the agency or design firm would resell.

Q: Did that certificate also cover photographs and illustrations?

A: Generally no. Those special printing aids were treated as taxable retail sales unless the buyer specifically claimed and documented resale.

Q: Was this a formal ruling the designer could rely on?

A: No. The letter expressly said legal-staff opinions were not rulings and the unidentified designer could not rely on it under section 6596.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code § 6596
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1668(d)

Source

Original ruling text

100.0145

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

WILLIAM M. BENNETT
First District, Kentfield

1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-6450

BRAD SHERMAN
Second District, Los Angeles
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG,
JR.
Third District, San Diego
MATTHEW K. FONG
Fourth District, Los Angeles

June 30, 1992

GRAY DAVIS
Controller, Sacramento
────────
BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director

Mr. D--- F. R---, C.P.A.
--- and --- Services
XXX --- ---, Suite XXX
--- ---, CA XXXXX
Dear Mr. R---:
This is in reply to your May 14, 1992 letter regarding the application of sales tax to charges by your client (the Designer) under the following facts you provided: “She is hired by corporations/businesses as an independent contractor to design and produce mechanical artwork for a variety of printed materials. The company assigns her a project - such as a brochure, package, data sheet, flyer, letterhead, etc. - and the first thing she submits to him is an Estimate Agreement, (Exhibit A) which outlines the project, gives an estimate of her time, and an estimate of the reimbursable expenses she feels will be necessary to complete the project. It also outlines the payment schedule she expects, has an ownership clause, and some minor legal stipulations that are customary to her profession. Once the client reads and signs the Estimate Agreement, she begins the job. It is from this point that the client is financially responsible for her time and all expenditures made on his behalf. “The design process begins with her working up two or three preliminary designs (preliminary art) to present the client for consideration. Once a design is chosen, the client owns that design and she begins to assemble the pieces necessary to complete a final piece of artwork for the printer. If a design is not chosen, she is either asked to work up more designs, or to resign from the assignment. As a kind of “project manager,” she researchs and purchases all photography and illustration that are not provided by the client, and other supplies (type, art supplies, etc) necessary for her to complete the mechanical artwork. It is understood that anything she purchases to complete the mechanical artwork (photographs, illustrations, etc.) is to be returned to the client with the artwork,

Mr. D--- F. R---, C.P.A.

-2-

June 30, 1992
100.0145

and that at no time does she hold title or ownership of these items. Occasionally, she will purchase the printing of the piece as well, but for the most part, gives the artwork to the client, and he contracts a printing firm directly. “The mechanical artwork is a black and white paste-up of the brochure\package\data sheet\flyer\letterhead layout. The shape of the item is drawn on a piece of white art board, then type galleys of the body copy and headlines are pasted into position on the art board, the logo stats are pasted into position on the art board, and she sizes the photographs\illustrations to fit in a designated area on the artwork. The piece of artwork is marked clearly on a tissue overlay for the printer to understand what colors the item is to be printed, where the photographs\illustrations are to be placed, what kind of paper the item is to be printed on and how many copies of the item are to be printed. He then photographs my mechanical artwork and compiles film negatives of the different colors which he uses to make the plates for the printing press.” You noted that the Designer purchases the following items you referred to as “expenses” under a resale certificate and does not pay sales tax reimbursement on the purchase: photography, illustration, type-lino output, photostats\film processing services, art supplies, color separations, printing, copyrighting. The Designer indicates the charge as a line item on the invoice and charges the client sales tax reimbursement. You noted that the Designer does pay sales tax reimbursement on the purchase of such items when she purchases them for her own use. The estimate agreement you sent (your Exhibit A) provides under “Ownership”: “Title of all items purchased by on behalf of the client is transfered to the client at the time of purchase and prior to usage by Design. In addition, all items purchased are deemed to be resold at the same time.” The Invoice you sent (your Exhibit B) shows that the Designer charges tax reimbursement on the total selling price of the taxable retail sale. Given this information, you asked for our opinion that the Designer is correct in considering that the following charges are not taxable: “1.

PRELIMINARY ART
When a design is not chosen to be completed to mechanical form.”

We are assuming that you are referring only to the situation where the Designer resigns from an assignment and retains title to and possession of designs and provides no tangible personal property to the client. In such case, we agree that tax does not apply to her charge to the client for her time spent.

Mr. D--- F. R---, C.P.A.

“2.

-3-

June 30, 1992
100.0145

AGENCY\DESIGN FIRM
If she is doing a project for an advertising agency or another design firm where she has no direct contact with the client, and the agency or design firm has provided her with a completed resale tax card, she does not charge tax to the agency or design firm assuming the agency or design firm will charge tax on the final invoice to the client.”

The Designer may accept a resale certificate from an advertising agency or another design firm for the sale of the final product which will be sold by the ad agency or other design firm. On the other hand, the Designer's sale of special printing aids such as photography, illustrations, and the other items you listed as “expenses” generally would be a retail sale subject to sales tax regardless that the sale of the final product is a nontaxable sale or resale. The Designer may accept a resale certificate for the sale of those items only if the advertising agency or other design firm insists that it is purchasing the property for resale. In such case, the designer should require the purchaser to provide a resale certificate containing a statement that the specific property is being purchased for resale in the regular course of business. See Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1668, Resale Certificates, subdivision (d). You asked that we provide you with a “formal ruling.” The Board's legal staff's opinions are not rulings. In fact, since you did not identify the Designer, the Designer may not rely upon this opinion for purposes of Revenue and Taxation Code section 6596 which provides the conditions under which a person may rely on written advice from the State Board of Equalization. Very truly yours,

Ronald L. Dick
Senior Tax Counsel
RLD:sr
Enc.

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1992. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace