Utah: Will Revocation and Revival Requirements
The short answer
Utah permits whole or partial revocation by a later will, expressly or by inconsistency, or by burning, tearing, canceling, obliterating, or destroying all or part with revocatory intent; another person may act in the testator's conscious presence and by direction. Later-will presumptions and revival turn on the testator's intent, and Utah's clear-and-convincing harmless-error rule can validate a document intended as a revocation, alteration, or revival. Divorce or annulment broadly revokes former-spouse and former-spouse-relative provisions, while remarriage revives provisions revoked solely by that rule.
Ask Ezel about your situation
This is the general rule in Utah. Ask about your specific facts and see which parts of current Utah law apply, with citations to the statutes.
| Governing law and scope | Utah Code §§ 75-1-201(67), 75-2-503, 75-2-507 to -509, 75-2-804, and 75-2-1403; 'will' includes codicils and revoking/revising instruments, and ordinary will law applies to electronic wills unless Part 14 modifies it |
|---|---|
| Later will, codicil, or writing | Later will revokes expressly or by inconsistency. Complete disposition presumes replacement; incomplete disposition presumes supplementation, each rebuttable by clear and convincing evidence (§ 75-2-507). A defective writing may revoke on clear-and-convincing intent proof (§ 75-2-503). |
| Physical or electronic revoking act | Burn, tear, cancel, obliterate, or destroy the will or any part with intent/purpose; burn, tear, or cancellation need not touch words (§ 75-2-507). The same rule applies to electronic wills through § 75-2-1403 unless Part 14 modifies it. |
| Act by another person | Allowed in the testator's conscious presence and by the testator's direction; §§ 75-2-507 and 75-2-1403 state no separate witness count for the directed act |
| Partial revocation | Yes. A later will or a revocatory act may revoke any part; § 75-2-503 also validates an intended partial revocation or alteration on clear-and-convincing proof (§§ 75-2-503, -507). |
| Intent, proof, and presumptions | Act requires intent and purpose. Complete later will presumes replacement; incomplete later will presumes supplementation, rebuttable by clear and convincing evidence. Harmless-error revocation/alteration/revival also needs clear-and-convincing intent proof (§§ 75-2-503, -507). |
| Divorce, annulment, and other family events | Divorce/annulment revokes revocable gifts, powers, and fiduciary nominations for former spouse and qualifying relatives, subject to instrument/order/contract exceptions; separation alone is not divorce, remarriage/nullification revives, and no other circumstance change revokes (§§ 75-2-508, -804). |
| Revival after a later will or revoking act | If later will wholly revoked earlier and is revoked by act, earlier remains revoked unless circumstances/declarations show revival intent. If later will partly revoked earlier and is revoked by act, the revoked part revives unless contrary intent appears. Revocation by a third will revives only to intent shown in that will (§ 75-2-509). |
| Reexecution, republication, and codicil effect | A formal or harmless-error writing may show revival, and a later will can expressly restore as its terms show (§§ 75-2-503, -509). Because 'will' includes codicils, § 75-2-509's whole/partial later-will rules also cover codicil effects; possession alone is not enough. |
Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →
Requirements one by one
Governing law and scope
Utah's main sequence is §§ 75-2-503 and 75-2-507 through 75-2-509, with the
family-status overlay in § 75-2-804. The definition in § 75-1-201(67) includes
codicils and instruments that merely revoke or revise a prior will.
Electronic wills are not a separate island. Section 75-2-1403 says an
electronic will is a will for all purposes and applies ordinary will law unless
Part 14 modifies it, so the revocation and revival rules carry over.
Later will, codicil, or writing
A subsequent will revokes the earlier will or part expressly or by
inconsistency. Under § 75-2-507, a complete disposition
presumptively replaces the earlier will; an incomplete disposition
presumptively supplements it and revokes only inconsistent terms. Either
presumption can be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence.
Utah also permits a defective document or writing to operate as a partial or
complete revocation when § 75-2-503's clear-and-convincing intent standard is
met.
Physical or electronic revoking act
The listed acts are burning, tearing, canceling, obliterating, and destroying
the will or any part. The testator must act with intent and for the purpose of
revocation. A burn, tear, or cancellation counts even if it did not touch the
words on the document.
Because § 75-2-1403 applies ordinary will law to electronic wills, Part 14 does
not create a different revocation list in the cited current text.
Act by another person
Another individual may perform the act in the testator's conscious presence
and by the testator's direction. Section 75-2-507 states no separate witness
count for that act.
Partial revocation
Utah expressly allows partial revocation by both routes. A later will may
revoke a prior “will or part,” and a revocatory act may target “the will or any
part of it.” Section 75-2-503 separately allows a defective writing intended as
a partial revocation or alteration to be treated as compliant on clear and
convincing proof.
Intent, proof, and presumptions
Physical revocation requires intent and purpose. For two overlapping wills,
the completeness of the later disposition determines whether replacement or
supplementation is presumed, and clear and convincing evidence may rebut that
presumption.
The same evidence level governs § 75-2-503's curative route for a document
intended as a revocation, alteration, or revival. The cited sections state no
separate missing-original presumption.
Divorce, annulment, and other family events
Section 75-2-508 says a change of circumstances does not revoke a will except
under the specifically cross-referenced statutes. Under § 75-2-804(2), divorce or
annulment broadly revokes revocable gifts, property appointments, powers of
appointment, and fiduciary nominations for the former spouse and qualifying
former-spouse relatives, subject to contrary terms in an instrument, court
order, or marital-estate contract.
Affected provisions operate through disclaimer or predeceased-person rules.
Remarriage to the former spouse or nullification of the divorce or annulment
revives provisions revoked solely by § 75-2-804. A decree of separation that
does not end the marriage is not a divorce under the section.
Revival after a later will or revoking act
Utah separates three situations. If a later will wholly revoked the earlier
will and is then revoked by act, the earlier will stays revoked unless
circumstances or the testator's contemporary or later declarations show intent
to revive it.
If the later will only partly revoked the earlier one and is revoked by act,
the revoked part comes back unless those circumstances or declarations show
the testator did not want it restored. If a third will revokes the second will,
the first will or part revives only to the extent the third will's terms show
that intent.
Reexecution, republication, and codicil effect
Utah does not limit restoration to formal reexecution. Section 75-2-503 can
validate a document intended as a partial or complete revival on clear and
convincing proof, and § 75-2-509 recognizes revival shown by declarations,
circumstances, or the terms of a later will.
Because “will” includes a codicil, the whole-versus-part rules also govern the
effect of revoking a codicil that changed an earlier will. Keeping the earlier
original without the required revival intent is not enough.
What trips people up
A cancellation does not have to cross out words. Utah expressly says a burn,
tear, or cancellation may be a revocatory act even when it never touched the
will's text, if the required intent and purpose are present.
Complete and incomplete later wills start from opposite presumptions. A later
instrument disposing of the full estate presumptively replaces; one that does
not presumptively supplements. Clear and convincing evidence is needed to
rebut either starting point.
Revoking a later will can produce opposite revival defaults. After whole
revocation of the first will, it stays revoked absent revival intent. After
partial revocation, the revoked part presumptively returns unless contrary
intent appears.
Common questions
Can an improperly signed note still revoke or revive a Utah will?
Potentially. Section 75-2-503 permits a noncompliant document or writing to be
treated as a partial or complete revocation, alteration, or revival when clear
and convincing evidence establishes that intent.
Do Utah's revocation rules apply to an electronic will?
Yes. Section 75-2-1403 makes an electronic will a will for all purposes and
applies ordinary will law except where Part 14 modifies it.
Statutes and sources
- Utah Code § 75-1-201(67) — “will” includes codicils and instruments that
merely revoke or revise a prior will. Official
text
(accessed 2026-08-01). - Utah Code §§ 75-2-503 and 75-2-507 — harmless-error revocation,
alteration, and revival; later-will presumptions; physical acts; partial
revocation; and directed acts. Official
text
(accessed 2026-08-01). - Utah Code §§ 75-2-508 and 75-2-509 — circumstance changes and the three
revival branches. Official
text
(accessed 2026-08-01). - Utah Code § 75-2-804 — divorce, annulment, former-spouse relatives,
separation, disclaimer/predeceased treatment, and remarriage revival.
Official
text
(accessed 2026-08-01). - Utah Code § 75-2-1403 — ordinary will law applies to electronic wills
unless Part 14 modifies it. Official
text
(accessed 2026-08-01).
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.
Get the answer for your situation
You just read how Utah handles this in general. Ask your specific question and see which parts of current Utah law apply to your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.