Oklahoma: Will Revocation and Revival Requirements
The short answer
Oklahoma permits traditional wills to be revoked or altered by a will-formal writing or by burning, tearing, canceling, obliterating, or destroying with revocatory intent; a directed act must be proved by two witnesses. Partial obliteration may work, but not when it is merely part of an ineffective attempt to make a new disposition. Electronic wills have a separate all-or-part rule with a preponderance standard, divorce revokes former-spouse provisions, and revoking a later will does not revive the earlier one without renewal intent or republication.
Ask Ezel about your situation
This is the general rule in Oklahoma. Ask about your specific facts and see which parts of current Oklahoma law apply, with citations to the statutes.
| Governing law and scope | 84 O.S. §§ 91, 101–106, 113–114, and 906; §§ 101–106 govern traditional written wills, while § 906 separately governs electronic wills effective since Nov. 1, 2024 |
|---|---|
| Later will, codicil, or writing | Traditional: a will-formal revocation writing; later will revokes expressly or where wholly inconsistent, leaving consistent prior terms effective (§§ 101, 105). Electronic: later will revokes all/part expressly or by inconsistency (§ 906). |
| Physical or electronic revoking act | Traditional: burn, tear, cancel, obliterate, or destroy with intent/purpose; one duplicate may be revoked (§§ 101, 104). Electronic: any physical act proved under § 906's standard. |
| Act by another person | Traditional: in the testator's presence and by direction; direction and injury/destruction must be proved by two witnesses (§§ 101–102). Electronic: directed individual acts in testator's physical presence, proved by a preponderance (§ 906). |
| Partial revocation | Traditional: permitted by formal writing or obliteration; partial obliteration must show intent, but fails if used to attempt a new disposition that was not legally effected (§§ 101, 103). Electronic: all or part may be revoked (§ 906). |
| Intent, proof, and presumptions | Traditional act requires intent and purpose; directed cancellation/destruction requires two witnesses. Electronic physical act requires preponderance proof of intent and performance. Section 91 allows a lost/destroyed will to be established but states no revocation presumption. |
| Divorce, annulment, and other family events | Divorce/annulment revokes former-spouse provisions and treats the spouse as predeceased; no effect if decree is vacated, spouses remarry, or a later valid will/codicil follows (§ 114). Marriage alone is not a revoking event in the current §§ 101–114 scheme. |
| Revival after a later will or revoking act | Destroying, canceling, or revoking the later will does not revive the former unless the revocation terms show intent to renew it or the testator republishes the prior will (§ 106) |
| Reexecution, republication, and codicil effect | Section 106 recognizes republication of the prior will but does not separately prescribe its form. Revoking a will revokes all its codicils (§ 113); mere survival of the older original is not automatic revival. |
Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →
Requirements one by one
Governing law and scope
Oklahoma's traditional rules are in 84 O.S. §§ 101 through 106, with related
codicil and divorce rules in §§ 113 and 114. Section 101 reaches a written will
“nor any part thereof.” Since November 1, 2024, § 906 has supplied a separate
revocation rule for electronic wills.
Section 91 keeps loss and revocation distinct. A lost or destroyed will may be
established “in the cases provided by law,” so disappearance does not itself
answer whether the testator revoked it.
Later will, codicil, or writing
Under § 101, a traditional will or part may be revoked or altered by another
written will or by another revocation writing, but that writing must be executed
with the same formalities required for the testator's will.
Under § 105, a later will revokes the prior
one if it says so expressly or contains provisions wholly inconsistent with the
earlier terms. Otherwise, the earlier will remains effective to the extent the
two can operate consistently.
For an electronic will, § 906 allows a subsequent will to revoke all or part
expressly or by inconsistency.
Physical or electronic revoking act
Section 101 lists burning, tearing, canceling, obliterating, and destroying a
traditional will or part. The act must be done with intent and for the purpose
of revocation.
Electronic wills use a broader formulation. Section 906 does not list particular
acts; it permits a “physical act” when the required intent and conduct are
proved by a preponderance of the evidence.
Act by another person
For a traditional will, another person may perform the act in the testator's
presence and by the testator's direction. Under § 102, the direction
and the fact of injury or destruction must be proved by two witnesses.
For an electronic will, the testator may direct another individual to act in
the testator's physical presence. Section 906's preponderance standard applies
to the intent and performance of that directed act.
Partial revocation
Traditional partial revocation is permitted, but § 103 creates a trap. An
obliteration on the face of the will may be partial or total and is complete if
the material part is obliterated in a way that shows revocatory intent. If the
testator made the alteration to substitute a new disposition, however, the
revocation fails unless the new disposition was legally effected.
Section 906 expressly permits an electronic will to revoke all or part of a
previous will and permits all or part of the electronic will itself to be
revoked.
Intent, proof, and presumptions
Traditional physical revocation requires both intent and a revocatory purpose.
A directed cancellation or destruction has the separate two-witness proof rule,
and partial obliteration must visibly show an intention to revoke the affected
material.
Electronic physical-act revocation uses a preponderance standard for both the
testator's intent and the act performed personally or by the directed
individual. Section 91 allows proof of a lost or destroyed will but creates no
automatic revocation presumption in its text.
Divorce, annulment, and other family events
Under § 114, divorce revokes all will provisions in favor of the former spouse,
annulment has the same effect, and the former spouse is treated as having
predeceased the testator. The automatic rule does not apply if the decree is
vacated, the former spouses remarry, or the testator later executes a new valid
will or codicil.
Marriage alone is not a revoking event in the current §§ 101 through 114
scheme. Separate omitted-spouse or omitted-child rules may affect distribution,
but they are not revocation under these sections.
Revival after a later will or revoking act
Under § 106, destroying, canceling, or revoking
the later will does not revive the former will. Revival occurs only if the terms
of the revocation show an intent to renew the former will or the testator
republishes the prior will.
Reexecution, republication, and codicil effect
The text of § 106 uses “republishes” as the formal restoration concept but does not
separately define the required republication method. Section 113 supplies the
codicil consequence in the other direction: revocation of a will revokes all
of its codicils.
What trips people up
Crossing out a gift and writing a replacement can fail in both directions.
Under § 103, if the attempted new disposition is not legally effective, the
associated revocation by alteration or obliteration is also invalid.
Traditional and electronic revocations use different proof rules. A directed
traditional destruction must be proved by two witnesses. An electronic physical
act instead requires a preponderance of the evidence and physical presence when
another individual acts.
Destroying the newer will does not ordinarily restore the older one. Section
106 still requires renewal intent expressed in the revocation or republication
of the prior will.
Common questions
Can an Oklahoma will executed in duplicate be revoked by destroying one original?
Yes. Section 104 says revocation of a will executed in duplicate may be made by
revoking one of the duplicates.
Can a lost or destroyed Oklahoma will still be proved?
Potentially. Section 91 says a lost or destroyed will may be established in the
cases provided by law. That rule permits proof of the instrument; it does not
declare that every missing original was revoked or preserved.
Statutes and sources
- 84 O.S. § 91 — a lost or destroyed will may be established in cases
provided by law. Official
text
(accessed 2026-08-01). - 84 O.S. §§ 101–103 — formal revocation writings, listed physical acts,
directed-act proof, and partial obliteration. §
101,
§
102,
and §
103
(accessed 2026-08-01). - 84 O.S. §§ 104–106 — duplicate wills, later-will inconsistency, and
revival by renewal intent or republication. §
104,
§
105,
and §
106
(accessed 2026-08-01). - 84 O.S. §§ 113–114 — revoking the will revokes its codicils; divorce or
annulment revokes former-spouse provisions subject to stated exceptions. §
113
and §
114
(accessed 2026-08-01). - 84 O.S. § 906 — electronic-will revocation by a later will or a proved
physical act. Official
text
(accessed 2026-08-01).
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.
Get the answer for your situation
You just read how Oklahoma handles this in general. Ask your specific question and see which parts of current Oklahoma law apply to your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.