Will Revocation and Revival Requirements in New Jersey

Short answer New Jersey permits express or inconsistency-based revocation by a later will and permits burning, tearing, canceling, obliterating, or destroying all or part of a will with revocatory intent; another person may act in the testator's conscious presence and at the testator's direction. Complete- versus incomplete-disposition presumptions, a clear-and-convincing harmless-error route, broad divorce effects, and distinct whole- and partial-revival rules make the testator's intent decisive.
State
New Jersey
Statute checked
August 1, 2026
Sources
5 statutes
Pending legislation could change this.
NJ A3199 (2026–2027) (Introduced and referred to the Assembly Judiciary Committee on January 13, 2026; no later action was located through the official June 30 statewide last-action publication, checked August 14, 2026.): Would require a noncompliant document or writing to be signed by the testator or substantially in the testator's handwriting before the clear-and-convincing route could treat it as a revocation, alteration, or revival. track it Status checked August 14, 2026.
NJ S1336 / A3229 (2026–2027) (Introduced and referred to the Senate and Assembly Judiciary Committees on January 13, 2026; no later action was located through the official June 30 statewide last-action publication, checked August 14, 2026.): Would authorize electronic wills. An electronic will could revoke a previous will, and it could itself be revoked by a later will or by a physical act proved by a preponderance of the evidence and performed by the testator or a directed person in the testator's physical presence. track it Status checked August 14, 2026.

At a glance

Governing law and scopeN.J.S.A. 3B:3-3 and 3B:3-13–15; will is a governing instrument under N.J.S.A. 3B:1-1
Later will, codicil, or writingLater will revokes expressly or by inconsistency; § 3B:3-3 can validate a noncompliant revoking writing on clear-and-convincing proof
Physical or electronic revoking actBurn, tear, cancel, obliterate, or destroy all/part with intent; burn, tear, or cancellation need not touch words; no electronic act stated (§ 3B:3-13)
Act by another personAllowed in testator's conscious presence and at testator's direction (§ 3B:3-13(b))
Partial revocationLater will, revocatory act, or § 3B:3-3 writing may revoke a part; inconsistency is partial when later will supplements (§§ 3B:3-3, -13)
Intent, proof, and presumptionsComplete/incomplete disposition creates replace/supplement presumptions rebuttable by clear and convincing evidence; same burden for § 3B:3-3 writing
Divorce, annulment, and other family eventsDivorce/annulment, including divorce from bed and board, revokes revocable benefits/powers/nominations for former spouse and certain relatives; remarriage revives (§ 3B:3-14)
Revival after a later will or revoking actWhole/partial and act/later-will routes use different intent defaults; clear-and-convincing proof applies to act-based intent (§§ 3B:3-3, -15)
Reexecution, republication, and codicil effectBaseline revival by reexecution or duly executed codicil expressing revival intent; § 3B:3-3 can validate a noncompliant reviving writing (§ 3B:3-15)

Requirements one by one

Governing law and scope

New Jersey's current revocation and revival rules are N.J.S.A. 3B:3-3 and 3B:3-13 through 3B:3-15. The Title 3B definition of “governing instrument” expressly includes a will, connecting the divorce rule to testamentary gifts, powers, and appointments as well as its broader nonprobate reach.

Later will, codicil, or writing

N.J.S.A. 3B:3-13 permits a later will to revoke expressly or by inconsistency. A complete disposition creates a replacement presumption; an incomplete disposition creates a supplementation presumption. Clear and convincing evidence is required to rebut either.

N.J.S.A. 3B:3-3 adds a harmless-error route. A document or writing that did not comply with ordinary execution formalities can still constitute a partial or complete revocation if clear and convincing evidence proves the decedent intended that result.

Physical or electronic revoking act

The physical acts are burning, tearing, canceling, obliterating, and destroying the will or part, coupled with intent and purpose to revoke. A burn, tear, or cancellation can qualify even when it touches none of the will's words. Current N.J.S.A. 3B:3-13 states no electronic deletion or record-control act.

Act by another person

Another individual may perform the revocatory act only in the testator's conscious presence and at the testator's direction. That language differs from the physical- presence standard proposed for electronic wills in the pending bills.

Partial revocation

N.J.S.A. 3B:3-13 begins with a will “or any part thereof,” so both the later-will and revocatory-act routes can work partially. When a later will supplements rather than replaces, it revokes only inconsistent portions. N.J.S.A. 3B:3-3 separately allows proof of an intended partial revocation or alteration.

Intent, proof, and presumptions

Physical revocation requires intent and purpose. A later will's complete or incomplete disposition triggers opposing replace-or-supplement presumptions, rebuttable only by clear and convincing evidence. N.J.S.A. 3B:3-3 uses that same burden for a noncompliant revoking, altering, or reviving writing.

Divorce, annulment, and other family events

Subject to the governing instrument's express terms, a court order, or a marital- estate contract, divorce or annulment revokes revocable gifts, powers of appointment, and fiduciary or representative nominations benefiting the former spouse. It also reaches a former spouse's relative who is no longer related to the testator after the divorce.

The affected benefits operate as if disclaimed, while revoked appointments operate as if the person died immediately before the divorce or annulment. New Jersey's definition expressly includes a judgment of divorce from bed and board. Remarriage to the former spouse—or revocation, suspension, or nullification of the divorce or annulment—revives provisions revoked solely by N.J.S.A. 3B:3-14. No other change of circumstances causes revocation except the separate N.J.S.A. 3B:7-1 rule.

Revival after a later will or revoking act

N.J.S.A. 3B:3-15 separates three cases. If a wholly revoking later will is revoked by act, the earlier will stays revoked unless clear and convincing evidence shows revival intent. If the later will revoked only part, that part returns unless clear and convincing evidence shows contrary intent. If another later will revokes the revoking will, restoration reaches only as far as the newest will's terms show.

N.J.S.A. 3B:3-3 also permits a noncompliant document to constitute partial or complete revival on clear and convincing proof of intent.

Reexecution, republication, and codicil effect

Outside the specific divorce and later-will branches, N.J.S.A. 3B:3-15's baseline is reexecution of the revoked will or a duly executed codicil that expresses an intention to revive it. The harmless-error statute provides a separate route for a noncompliant reviving writing when the required evidence exists.

What trips people up

The physical mark does not have to touch the text. New Jersey expressly treats a burn, tear, or cancellation as potentially revocatory even when none of the words is affected. Intent remains independently required.

Divorce from bed and board is included in the statute's defined trigger. That is not the same rule as a state that requires a decree fully terminating the marriage, so the precise New Jersey judgment matters.

Common questions

Can an improperly executed note revoke or revive a will?

Potentially. Current N.J.S.A. 3B:3-3 requires clear and convincing evidence that the decedent intended the writing as a partial or complete revocation, alteration, or revival. Pending A3199 would add a signature-or-handwriting threshold.

Does a later will always replace the earlier will completely?

No. A complete disposition presumptively replaces the earlier will, while an incomplete disposition presumptively supplements it. In the latter case, both remain operative except where inconsistent unless the presumption is rebutted.

Does divorce cancel the entire will?

No. N.J.S.A. 3B:3-14 revokes specified revocable benefits, powers, and appointments for the former spouse and qualifying relatives. It does not declare the entire will revoked.

Can destroying the newer will bring the older will back?

Sometimes, but the defaults differ. A wholly revoked earlier will needs clear and convincing evidence of revival intent; a partially revoked provision returns unless clear and convincing evidence shows that the testator did not want it restored.

Statutes and sources

  • N.J.S.A. 3B:1-1 — governing-instrument definition. Expressly includes a will. P.L.2004, c.132 (accessed 2026-08-01).
  • N.J.S.A. 3B:3-3 — writings intended as wills. Provides the clear-and- convincing route for noncompliant revoking, altering, and reviving writings. P.L.2005, c.160 (accessed 2026-08-01).
  • N.J.S.A. 3B:3-13 — later wills and revocatory acts. Covers express and inconsistency-based revocation, physical acts, directed acts, partial revocation, and replace-or-supplement presumptions. P.L.2004, c.132 (accessed 2026-08-01).
  • N.J.S.A. 3B:3-14 — divorce, annulment, and remarriage. States the affected benefits and appointments, construction rules, defined triggers, exceptions, and revival events. P.L.2005, c.160 (accessed 2026-08-01).
  • N.J.S.A. 3B:3-15 — revival. Provides the reexecution/codicil baseline and the separate whole, partial, and later-will intent rules. P.L.2004, c.132 (accessed 2026-08-01).

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

N.J.S.A. 3B:1-1 · accessed 2026-08-01
N.J.S.A. 3B:3-3 · accessed 2026-08-01
N.J.S.A. 3B:3-13 · accessed 2026-08-01
N.J.S.A. 3B:3-14 · accessed 2026-08-01
N.J.S.A. 3B:3-15 · accessed 2026-08-01
This page is general legal information about state-law revocation and revival of wills and codicils, not legal advice about a particular estate, missing or damaged original, divorce, remarriage, electronic record, probate dispute, or estate plan. Crossing out, tearing, deleting, or discarding a document may fail to revoke it, may revoke more than intended, or may create a fact-intensive proof dispute; revoking a later will does not necessarily bring an earlier will back. Family-status rules and omitted-spouse or omitted-child rights are separate questions. Verified against the cited official sources on the date shown; obtain licensed estate-planning or probate advice before altering, destroying, replacing, or relying on a will or codicil.

What does New Jersey law mean for your facts?

You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current New Jersey law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace