Nevada: Will Revocation and Revival Requirements
The short answer
Nevada permits a paper will to be revoked by a listed physical act performed with revocatory intent, by another properly executed will or codicil, by an electronic will, or by a compliant electronic revocation. A later marriage revokes the will only as to the surviving spouse, while divorce or annulment revokes former-spouse gifts, beneficial interests, and the personal-representative designation. Revoking a second will does not automatically revive the first; revival requires shown intent or reexecution of the first will.
Ask Ezel about your situation
This is the general rule in Nevada. Ask about your specific facts and see which parts of current Nevada law apply, with citations to the statutes.
| Governing law and scope | NRS 133.110–.130, with §§ 133.085, .320, and .340 for electronic wills, codicils, and revocations; § 133.160 supplies the later-born-child share rule |
|---|---|
| Later will, codicil, or writing | Paper will: another properly executed written will/codicil, electronic will, or compliant electronic revocation (§ 133.120(1)). Electronic will: a properly executed later will, codicil, electronic will, or other writing revokes all or part expressly or by inconsistency (§ 133.120(2)(a)). |
| Physical or electronic revoking act | Paper will or certified paper original: burn, tear, cancel, or obliterate with intent (§ 133.120). An electronic revocation must be an electronic record bearing the date, testator's electronic signature, and a qualifying authentication/notary/witness feature (§§ 133.085(1), .120). |
| Act by another person | Allowed for a paper will or certified paper original when performed in the testator's presence and at the testator's direction; no separate statutory witness count is stated (§ 133.120(1)(a), (2)(b)). |
| Partial revocation | Expressly allowed for an electronic will by a later properly executed writing, expressly or by inconsistency (§ 133.120(2)(a)). Section 133.120 does not expressly authorize a physical act against only part of a paper will or certified paper original. |
| Intent, proof, and presumptions | Listed physical acts require intent to revoke. The cited sections state no quantified proof standard or missing-original presumption; electronic revocation carries execution, custody, and optional paper-certification requirements (§§ 133.085, .320, .340). |
| Divorce, annulment, and other family events | Marriage after execution revokes only as to the surviving spouse unless a stated exception applies; divorce/annulment revokes former-spouse devises, beneficial interests, and personal-representative designation, subject to an approved agreement or court order (§§ 133.110, .115). A later-born child's intestate share leaves consistent will provisions intact (§ 133.160). |
| Revival after a later will or revoking act | Revoking a valid second will that included provisions revoking the first does not revive the first unless revival intent appears from the terms or manner of revocation, or the first will is reexecuted (§ 133.130). |
| Reexecution, republication, and codicil effect | Reexecution of the first will is an express revival route. Section 133.130 also recognizes revival intent shown by the terms or manner of revoking the second will, but states no separate codicil-republication or revoked-codicil restoration rule. |
Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →
Requirements one by one
Governing law and scope
Nevada's principal revocation and revival rules are NRS 133.110 through 133.130.
They distinguish ordinary written wills, electronic wills, electronic revocations,
and electronic wills converted into certified paper originals. Under § 133.320(3),
the statutory requirements governing an electronic will also govern an electronic
codicil and electronic revocation unless another law provides otherwise.
Later will, codicil, or writing
Section 133.120(1) lets a properly executed written will or codicil, a properly
executed electronic will, or a compliant electronic revocation revoke a paper will.
The paper-will paragraph does not separately state an express-versus-inconsistency
test.
For an electronic will, § 133.120(2)(a) is explicit: a later properly executed
will, codicil, electronic will, or other writing may revoke all or part either
expressly or by inconsistency. An informal note does not fit the requirement that
the later writing be executed as Chapter 133 prescribes.
Physical or electronic revoking act
The listed acts for a paper will are burning, tearing, cancelling, or obliterating
the will with intent to revoke it. The same acts apply to the certified paper
original of an electronic will after conversion.
An electronic revocation uses a different route. Section 133.120 and § 133.085(1)
require an electronic record containing the date and the testator's electronic
signature, plus at least one qualifying authentication characteristic, electronic
notary signature and seal, or set of two attesting-witness electronic signatures.
Act by another person
Another person may perform the listed act against a paper will or certified paper
original only in the testator's presence and at the testator's direction. Section
133.120 states no separate witness count or quantified proof standard for that
directed act.
Partial revocation
Nevada expressly permits a later properly executed writing to revoke all or part
of an electronic will. The physical-act paragraphs instead refer to burning,
tearing, cancelling, or obliterating “the will” or “the certified paper original”
and do not expressly state that marking only a provision revokes that part.
Intent, proof, and presumptions
The physical-act route requires an intention to revoke. The cited revocation
sections do not give a numerical evidence standard or create a presumption merely
because an original is missing or damaged.
Electronic records add a preservation overlay. Under § 133.340(7), a
qualified custodian to turn an electronic revocation into a paper certification
containing the revocation text and an affidavit describing creation, custody,
alteration status, custodians, and the related stored records.
Divorce, annulment, and other family events
Under § 133.110, marriage after execution revokes the will only as to the surviving spouse unless
the spouse was covered by a marriage contract, was provided for or intentionally
omitted in the will, or received an intended substitute transfer outside the will.
The spouse receives the intestate share, and consistent remaining provisions stay
intact.
Divorce or annulment revokes every devise, beneficial interest, and designation as
personal representative given to the former spouse in a predissolution will. The
exception is an approved property or separation agreement or an order in the
divorce or annulment proceeding; otherwise the will operates as if the former spouse
predeceased the testator.
A child born after execution receives an intestate share under § 133.160 unless a
stated intentional-omission or outside-transfer exception applies. The section
preserves will provisions consistent with that share rather than declaring the will
revoked.
Revival after a later will or revoking act
Under § 133.130, when a valid second will included provisions revoking the
first. Destroying, cancelling, or otherwise revoking the second will does not by
itself revive the first. Revival requires either intent shown by the terms or manner
of the later revocation, or reexecution of the first will.
What trips people up
Paper and electronic wills do not use identical revocation routes. A physical act
can revoke a certified paper original of an electronic will, but making an
electronic revocation requires the date, electronic signature, and one of the
authentication, notary, or witness features incorporated through § 133.085.
Destroying a newer will is not a reliable way to restore an older one. Section
133.130 makes the result depend on evidence of revival intent or a reexecuted first
will, even when the older original still exists.
Common questions
Does separation alone revoke a gift to a Nevada spouse?
Not under § 133.115. Its automatic former-spouse rule begins with divorce or
annulment and recognizes court-approved agreement and court-order exceptions.
Does a later marriage revoke the entire Nevada will?
No. Section 133.110 revokes the will only as to the surviving spouse and preserves
the remaining provisions to the extent they are consistent with the spouse's
intestate share.
Can a qualified custodian make a paper record of an electronic revocation?
Yes. Section 133.340(7) permits a certification made from a certified paper original
of the electronic will plus a tangible record containing the revocation text and
the required custody affidavit.
Statutes and sources
- NRS 133.085 and 133.120 — electronic requirements and revocation routes.
Section 133.085 supplies the electronic-record, date, signature, and authentication
features incorporated by § 133.120; § 133.120 separates paper, electronic, and
certified-paper methods. Official text
(accessed 2026-08-01). - NRS 133.110, 133.115, and 133.160 — family events. Later marriage revokes
only as to the spouse, divorce or annulment revokes specified former-spouse
provisions, and a later-born child may receive a share without revoking consistent
will terms. Official text
(accessed 2026-08-01). - NRS 133.130 — revival. Revocation of a second expressly revoking will does
not revive the first without shown revival intent or reexecution. Official
text (accessed
2026-08-01). - NRS 133.320 and 133.340 — electronic-codicil and certification overlay.
Electronic-will requirements generally carry over to electronic codicils and
revocations, and a qualified custodian may create the specified paper
certification of an electronic revocation. Official text
(accessed 2026-08-01).
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.
Get the answer for your situation
You just read how Nevada handles this in general. Ask your specific question and see which parts of current Nevada law apply to your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.