Minnesota: Will Revocation and Revival Requirements

verified against the statute 2026-08-01 5 statute sources

The short answer

Minnesota permits whole or partial revocation by a later will acting expressly or by inconsistency, or by an intent-based revocatory act such as burning, tearing, canceling, obliterating, or destroying. Because statutory conscious presence includes qualifying real-time electronic presence, another person may perform the directed act either physically nearby or over compliant audiovisual communication. Minnesota also has clear-and-convincing later-will presumptions and harmless error, divorce revocation, and different revival defaults for whole and partial revocation.

Ask Ezel about your situation

This is the general rule in Minnesota. Ask about your specific facts and see which parts of current Minnesota law apply, with citations to the statutes.

Governing law and scopeMinn. Stat. §§ 524.1-201(17), (43), (62), (64), 524.2-503, 524.2-507 to -509, and 524.2-804; 'will' includes electronic wills, codicils, and instruments that revoke/revise another will
Later will, codicil, or writingA subsequent will revokes all/part expressly or by inconsistency. Complete disposition presumes replacement; incomplete disposition presumes supplementation, rebuttable by clear and convincing evidence. Section 524.2-503 can cure a defective revocation writing on clear-and-convincing intent proof.
Physical or electronic revoking actBurn, tear, cancel, obliterate, or destroy the will/part with intent and purpose; the act need not touch words for burning, tearing, or canceling (§ 524.2-507). The same rule covers an electronic will through § 524.1-201; no separate deletion/custodian route is stated.
Act by another personAllowed at the testator's direction in the testator's conscious presence. For §§ 524.2-501 to -517, conscious presence includes physical see-and-hear proximity or simultaneous qualifying electronic sight-and-sound communication (§ 524.1-201(43)).
Partial revocationAllowed by both routes: a subsequent will may revoke the prior will or part, and a revocatory act may target the will or part (§ 524.2-507)
Intent, proof, and presumptionsPhysical act requires intent and purpose. Complete/incomplete later disposition creates replacement/supplement presumptions rebuttable by clear and convincing evidence. Harmless-error revocation or revival also requires clear-and-convincing intent proof and applies only to documents/writings executed on or after March 13, 2020.
Divorce, annulment, and other family eventsDissolution/annulment revokes revocable gifts/beneficiary designations to the former spouse and nonshared family, powers for the former spouse, and fiduciary nominations for the spouse/nonshared family, subject to express-instrument, court-order, property-contract, and retirement-plan exceptions. Remarriage/nullification revives provisions revoked solely by § 524.2-804; other circumstance changes generally do not revoke.
Revival after a later will or revoking actPhysical revocation of a wholly revoking later will leaves the prior will revoked unless circumstances/declarations show revival intent; physical revocation of a partly revoking later will revives the prior part unless contrary intent appears. Revocation by a still later will revives only as its terms show (§ 524.2-509).
Reexecution, republication, and codicil effectA codicil and an instrument that merely revokes/revises another will are included in 'will.' Minnesota states no universal reexecution-only rule: § 524.2-509 governs revival, and § 524.2-503 can validate a defective revival writing by clear-and-convincing proof.

Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →

Requirements one by one

Governing law and scope

Minnesota's central revocation and revival provisions are § 524.2-507 and Minn.
Stat. §§ 524.2-508 to -509, with harmless error in § 524.2-503 and dissolution effects in
§ 524.2-804. The definitions in Minn. Stat. § 524.1-201(17), (43), (62), and
(64) bring electronic wills, codicils,
and instruments that merely revoke or revise another will within these rules.

Later will, codicil, or writing

A subsequent will revokes the earlier will or part expressly or by
inconsistency. If it completely disposes of the estate, replacement is
presumed. If it does not make a complete disposition, supplementation is
presumed and the earlier will is revoked only to the extent of inconsistency.
Clear and convincing evidence is needed to rebut either presumption.

Section 524.2-503 can also treat a document or added writing that missed the
execution requirements as a partial or complete revocation if clear and
convincing evidence proves that intent. The curative rule applies only to
documents and writings executed on or after March 13, 2020.

Physical or electronic revoking act

Section 524.2-507 lists burning, tearing, canceling, obliterating, and
destroying the will or part. The testator must act with the intent and purpose
of revocation. A burn, tear, or cancellation can qualify even when it does not
touch any words.

Because “will” includes an electronic will, the same current section governs
both forms. It does not separately state a deletion-by-custodian route or a
special electronic-record evidence standard.

Act by another person

Another individual may perform the act at the testator's direction in the
testator's conscious presence. Minnesota defines that presence for these
sections to include either physical proximity allowing the people to see and
hear each other or simultaneous qualifying electronic communication by sight
and sound.

Partial revocation

Partial revocation is available through both statutory routes. A later will can
revoke only part of the earlier will, and a revocatory act can likewise target a
part rather than the whole.

Intent, proof, and presumptions

Physical revocation requires intent and purpose. The complete-disposition and
incomplete-disposition presumptions sort replacement from supplementation and
require clear and convincing evidence to rebut. Harmless-error treatment of a
defective revocation or revival writing also requires clear and convincing
proof of the decedent's intent.

The cited sections state no separate missing-original revocation presumption.
Whether a particular missing, damaged, or electronically maintained instrument
was revoked remains distinct from the listed acts and proof rules.

Divorce, annulment, and other family events

Dissolution or annulment revokes revocable gifts and beneficiary designations
for the former spouse and members of the former spouse's family who are not
also members of the individual's family. It also revokes powers of appointment
for the former spouse and fiduciary nominations for the spouse and those
nonshared family members.

The rule yields to the listed governing-instrument, court-order, marital-
property-contract, and retirement-plan terms. Remarriage to the former spouse
or nullification of the dissolution or annulment revives provisions revoked
solely by § 524.2-804. Other circumstance changes generally do not revoke a
will or part.

Revival after a later will or revoking act

If a later will wholly revoked the earlier will and is then revoked by an act,
the earlier will stays revoked unless circumstances or contemporary or later
declarations show revival intent.

If the later will revoked only part, revoking it by act presumptively restores
the prior part unless circumstances or declarations show contrary intent. If a
still later will revokes the intervening one, the earlier will or part revives
only as the newest will's terms show the testator intended.

Reexecution, republication, and codicil effect

A codicil and an instrument that merely revokes or revises another will are
included in “will.” Minnesota does not impose a universal reexecution-only
formula for restoration. Section 524.2-509 supplies the main revival tests,
while § 524.2-503 can validate a defective revival writing on clear and
convincing proof for documents within its effective-date rule.

What trips people up

“Conscious presence” is broader than physical presence in Minnesota's current
code. For revocation provisions, it can include real-time audiovisual
communication that meets the statutory sight-and-sound definition. That does
not eliminate the separate requirements of the testator's direction and
revocatory intent.

Revoking the later will also has different defaults based on scope. The prior
will stays revoked when the later instrument wholly displaced it unless revival
intent appears, while a prior part generally returns when the later will only
partly displaced it unless contrary intent appears.

Common questions

Must a cancellation touch the words of a Minnesota will?

Not necessarily. Section 524.2-507 says burning, tearing, or canceling may be a
revocatory act even when it does not touch any words, provided the required
intent and purpose exist.

Can another person revoke the will while appearing remotely?

Potentially. Minnesota's definition of conscious presence includes qualifying
simultaneous audiovisual communication, but the other person still must act at
the testator's direction and the statutory act-and-intent requirements must be
met.

Does destroying the newer will automatically restore the older one?

No. The result depends on whether the newer will revoked all or only part and
on the circumstances, declarations, or newest-will terms showing intent.

Statutes and sources

  • Minn. Stat. § 524.1-201 — electronic-will, presence, will, and writing
    definitions. Official
    text
    (accessed
    2026-08-01).
  • Minn. Stat. § 524.2-503 — clear-and-convincing harmless error for
    revocation and revival writings. Official
    text
    (accessed
    2026-08-01).
  • Minn. Stat. §§ 524.2-507 to -509 — later-will and act revocation,
    presumptions, circumstance changes, and revival. Official
    text
    (accessed
    2026-08-01).
  • Minn. Stat. § 524.2-804 — dissolution/annulment effects, exceptions,
    remarriage, and other circumstance changes. Official
    text
    (accessed
    2026-08-01).

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

Minn. Stat. § 524.2-503 · accessed 2026-08-01
Minn. Stat. § 524.2-507 · accessed 2026-08-01
Minn. Stat. §§ 524.2-508 to -509 · accessed 2026-08-23
This page is general legal information about state-law revocation and revival of wills and codicils, not legal advice about a particular estate, missing or damaged original, divorce, remarriage, electronic record, probate dispute, or estate plan. Crossing out, tearing, deleting, or discarding a document may fail to revoke it, may revoke more than intended, or may create a fact-intensive proof dispute; revoking a later will does not necessarily bring an earlier will back. Family-status rules and omitted-spouse or omitted-child rights are separate questions. Verified against the cited official sources on the date shown; obtain licensed estate-planning or probate advice before altering, destroying, replacing, or relying on a will or codicil.

Get the answer for your situation

You just read how Minnesota handles this in general. Ask your specific question and see which parts of current Minnesota law apply to your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.