Omitted or Pretermitted Children Under Wills in Arizona

Short answer A child born or adopted after an Arizona will may receive a share if the will does not provide for the child. The measure depends on whether the testator had living children when the will was made; intentional omission apparent from the will and an intended substitute transfer outside the will defeat the share. A living child omitted solely because the testator thought the child was dead receives the same protection. (Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-2302.)
State
Arizona
Statute checked
October 5, 2026
Sources
3 statutes

At a glance

Will and child coveredWill; later-born/adopted child or living child mistakenly believed dead (§ 14-2302(A), (E), (G)).
Birth or adoption timingBirth or adoption after will execution; mistaken-death route for then-living child (§ 14-2302(A), (E), (G)).
Naming and provision testFailure to provide by will triggers rule; no separate naming-only safe harbor stated (§ 14-2302(A)).
Intentional omissionIntentional omission must appear from the will (§ 14-2302(D)(1)).
Other-parent giftsIf no child lived at execution: substantially all to other parent, who survives and takes, bars share (§ 14-2302(A)(1)).
Outside gifts and advancementsOutside-will transfer bars share only when intended in lieu of will provision; statements, amount, or other evidence may show intent (§ 14-2302(D)(2)).
Baseline statutory shareNo then-living child: intestate-equivalent value; devise to existing child: equalized share of those child devises (§ 14-2302(A)).
Effect of gifts to existing childrenIf will benefits then-living children, share limited to their devises; preserve interest character where feasible (§ 14-2302(A)(2), (B)).
Property source and abatementExisting-child route: their devises abate ratably; no-child route: § 14-3902 order, subject to testamentary intent (§§ 14-2302(C), (F), 14-3902(A)–(B)).
Trust and nonprobate reachOutside-will transfer can defeat share if intended substitute; no general nonprobate recovery stated (§ 14-2302(D)(2)).

Requirements one by one

Which children qualify

Under § 14-2302(A) and (G), the ordinary route covers a child born or adopted after will execution whom the will fails to provide for. Subsection (E) adds a then-living child omitted solely because the testator believed the child had died. That child takes as though later born or adopted.

Share measure and existing children

If no child lived when the will was executed, § 14-2302(A)(1) gives an intestate-equivalent value, subject to the other-parent exception. If the will devised an interest to a then-living child, paragraph (A)(2) instead uses only the devises to those children: it asks what each would have received had all omitted children joined the benefited children in equal shares. Subsection (B) preserves, where feasible, the existing gift's equitable or legal, present or future character.

Which devises supply the share

For the existing-child route, § 14-2302(C) reduces the then-living children's devises ratably, while preserving the testamentary plan as far as possible. For the no-child route, subsection (F) invokes § 14-3902(A): undisposed property, residuary devises, general devises, then specific devises, with proportional abatement within each class. Section 14-3902(B) permits an order that gives effect to contrary testamentary intent.

What trips people up

The other-parent exception requires all of these § 14-2302(A)(1) facts: no child living at execution, all or substantially all devised to the omitted child's other parent, and that parent survives and is entitled to take. An outside-will benefit is different: subsection (D)(2) requires a transfer in lieu of testamentary provision. The testator's statements can show that intent, or the transfer amount or other evidence can support a reasonable inference. Intentional omission under (D)(1) must appear from the will.

Common questions

Does merely naming a future child settle the issue? Section 14-2302(A) asks whether the will provides for the child. It gives no separate naming-only exception.

Can the statute reach a trust or other nonprobate asset? Section 14-2302(D)(2) treats an intended substitute transfer outside the will as a bar to the share. These provisions do not themselves state a general recovery rule against nonprobate assets.

Statutes and sources

  • Ariz. Rev. Stat. §§ 14-2302 and 14-3902. Verbatim current text, official section URLs, and access dates appear in the source fields above.

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-2302(A)–(B) · accessed 2026-10-05
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-2302(C)–(G) · accessed 2026-10-05
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-3902(A)–(B) · accessed 2026-10-05
This page gives general information about omitted-child statutes, not advice about a particular child, will, or estate. The will's words, other law, and the facts can change the result. Check current official law and consult a licensed adviser before acting.

What does Arizona law mean for your facts?

You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current Arizona law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace