California: Spousal Elective Share Requirements
The short answer
California has no general spousal elective share or election against an existing will. Instead, one-half of community property and one-half of the decedent's quasi-community property belong to the survivor at death, while Probate Code § 102 provides a limited restoration remedy for certain quasi- community transfers. A separate omitted-spouse law may apply when every testamentary instrument predates the marriage, but that is not an elective share.
Ask Ezel about your situation
This is the general rule in California. Ask about your specific facts and see which parts of current California law apply, with citations to the statutes.
| Governing law and system | No general elective share or will-renunciation system; survivor instead has community and quasi-community property rights under Prob. Code §§ 100–102 |
|---|---|
| Eligible spouse and who may elect | N/A No elective-share claimant; §§ 100–101 apply when the decedent was married or in a registered domestic partnership |
| Share amount and marriage length | No elected percentage; one-half of community property and one-half of the decedent's quasi-community property belong to the survivor, with the other halves belonging to the decedent (§§ 100–101) |
| Estate base and nonprobate transfers | No elective or augmented estate; § 102 can restore half of specified retained-benefit, revocable/consumable, or survivorship quasi-community transfers, but excludes life insurance, joint annuity, and pension |
| Deductions, exclusions, and valuation | N/A No elective-share deductions or valuation formula; for a qualifying § 102 transfer, the remedy is half the property, proceeds, or value at transfer |
| Deadline, extensions, and withdrawal | N/A No elective-share election deadline, extension, or withdrawal rule |
| Filing, service, and court procedure | N/A No elective-share filing or service process; § 13650 separately permits a spouse-property confirmation petition |
| Waiver and agreement requirements | N/A No elective-share right to waive |
| Payment sources and recipient liability | N/A No elective-share contribution system; property restored under § 102 belongs to the survivor as though the transfer had not been made |
| Effect of election and other spousal rights | No election affects will benefits; §§ 100–101 fix the survivor's ownership, while § 21610 separately protects a spouse omitted from instruments made before marriage |
Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →
What California does instead
California does not create a general elective share or a right to renounce an
existing will for a fixed percentage. The complete current Probate Code table of
contents has no elective-share, augmented-estate, or will-renunciation chapter.
Its death-of-a-married-person rules instead begin with ownership: under §§ 100–101,
one-half of community property and one-half of the decedent's quasi-community
property belong to the survivor, while the other halves belong to the decedent.
That is a division of property at death, not an election against the will.
Section 102 adds a narrower protection for quasi-community property. If a
California domiciliary transferred covered property without substantial-value
consideration and without the spouse's written consent or joinder, the survivor
may require restoration of one-half when the decedent retained possession,
enjoyment, income, revocation or consumption power, or when the property was held
with survivorship rights. The section excludes life insurance, accident insurance,
joint annuities, and pensions from restoration. Restored property belongs to the
survivor as though the transfer had not occurred.
The ownership rule does not require an elective-share form. If a court order is
useful, § 13650 permits the survivor or a listed representative to petition the
superior court for an order confirming property that belongs to the survivor under
§ 100 or § 101. That spouse-property petition is not an election for a percentage
of an elective estate.
What trips people up
- The one-half interest is ownership, not a claim against the will. Calling it
an elective share incorrectly suggests that the survivor must choose it and that
the decedent owned both halves. - Section 102 is not an augmented-estate formula. It applies only to specified
quasi-community transfers that satisfy every condition in the section, and its
remedy is restoration of one-half rather than calculation of a percentage across
the decedent's estate. - An omitted spouse is a different issue. Section 21610 applies only when the
spouse married the decedent after all of the decedent's testamentary instruments
were executed. It does not create a general election against a will made during
the marriage.
Common questions
Can a California spouse file an election against an existing will? No general
California elective-share statute authorizes that filing. The relevant statutory
starting point is the survivor's ownership under §§ 100–101, with § 102 addressing
certain quasi-community transfers.
Does the survivor need a court order to own the statutory half? Sections
100–101 say the half “belongs to” the survivor at death. Section 13650 separately
allows a petition asking the court to confirm that ownership when an order is
needed for administration or title purposes.
What if the will was signed before the marriage? That fact raises the separate
omitted-spouse statute. Section 21610 can provide a share only when the marriage
occurred after every testamentary instrument, subject to § 21611's exceptions; it
is outside this survey's general elective-share question.
Statutes and sources
The source is the California Legislative Counsel's official bulk publication of
the current codes at https://downloads.leginfo.legislature.ca.gov (file
pubinfo_2025.zip), accessed 2026-08-02. The paired section rows and text files
supplied the current language quoted in the frontmatter.
- California Probate Code, complete table of contents — the full 564-heading
index contains no elective-share, augmented-estate, or will-renunciation part,
chapter, or article; it separately lists Part 1 on community and quasi-community
property at death and Chapter 2 on omitted spouses. - Cal. Prob. Code §§ 100–101 — one-half ownership of community and quasi-
community property at death; amended by Stats. 2016, Ch. 50, Secs. 79–80,
effective January 1, 2017. - Cal. Prob. Code § 102 — restoration of one-half of specified quasi-community
transfers, exclusions, and effect of restoration; enacted by Stats. 1990, Ch. 79. - Cal. Prob. Code § 13650 — optional petition to confirm property passing or
belonging to the survivor; enacted by Stats. 1990, Ch. 79. - Cal. Prob. Code § 21610 — separate share for a spouse omitted from all
premarriage testamentary instruments; added by Stats. 1997, Ch. 724, Sec. 34,
effective January 1, 1998. - Cal. Prob. Code §§ 21611–21612 — exceptions and the sources used to
satisfy an omitted-spouse share; § 21611 amended by Stats. 2019, Ch. 10,
Sec. 3, effective January 1, 2020, and § 21612 added by Stats. 2003, Ch. 32,
Sec. 17, effective January 1, 2004.
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.
Get the answer for your situation
You just read how California handles this in general. Ask your specific question and see which parts of current California law apply to your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.