South Carolina: Residential Lease Execution Formalities

Requirements one by one

Writing threshold

South Carolina uses a clean one-year line for the ordinary lease. S.C. Code
§ 27-35-10 expressly allows an oral tenancy “for not to exceed one year.” Under
§ 27-35-20, an agreement to use or occupy real estate for more than one year is
void unless it is written. A term of exactly one year therefore remains on the
oral side of that lease-specific line.

The general statute of frauds adds a timing test. S.C. Code § 32-3-10 bars an action
on an agreement that cannot be performed within one year after it is made unless
a written note or memorandum is signed as the statute requires.

Required signatures and authority

Section 32-3-10 asks for the signature of the party against whom enforcement is
sought, or a person lawfully authorized by that party. It does not say that the
agent's authority itself must be written.

The Residential Landlord and Tenant Act supplies a practical cure when one side
did not sign and deliver the written agreement. Under § 27-40-320, a landlord's
unreserved acceptance of rent can give the agreement the same effect as the
landlord's signature and delivery. A tenant's unreserved acceptance of possession
and payment of rent can do the same for the tenant. The cure never carries a
claimed term beyond one year.

Witness, acknowledgment, and notary

Sections 27-35-20 and 32-3-10 require writing and a signature but do not add a
witness, acknowledgment, seal, or notary requirement merely to bind the original
landlord and tenant.

Recording has a separate formality. S.C. Code § 30-5-30 says an instrument must
be acknowledged or proved before it can be recorded. The statute supplies several
routes, including proof by a subscribing witness or compliance with the Uniform
Recognition of Acknowledgments Act. That is a land-record requirement, not a
universal lease-execution requirement.

Electronic execution

South Carolina's electronic-transactions statute covers ordinary lease formation,
but it does not force either party online. S.C. Code § 26-6-50 applies only when the
parties agree to transact electronically, with agreement determined from the
context, surrounding circumstances, and conduct.

S.C. Code § 26-6-70 lets an electronic record satisfy a writing requirement and
an electronic signature satisfy a signature requirement. If information must be
delivered in writing, S.C. Code § 26-6-80 requires a record the recipient can
print or store; a sender who blocks retention cannot enforce that electronic record against
the recipient. S.C. Code § 26-6-30 separately excludes required notices about default,
eviction, or cure under a primary-residence rental agreement. E-signing the lease
does not by itself move those later notices online.

Required copy or written statement

The surveyed statutes state no general deadline for delivering a fully executed
lease copy. Section 27-40-320 instead explains when rent, possession, and payment
give an unsigned or undelivered written agreement the same effect as signature and
delivery.

S.C. Code § 27-40-420 does require a different written statement. At or before
the tenancy begins, the landlord or authorized leasing person must give the tenant
the name and address of an owner or owner-authorized person for service of process
and receipt of notices or demands. The information must remain current and binds
successor landlords, owners, and managers.

Renewal, modification, and term form

The cited provisions create no separate renewal form. A renewal or extension for
more than one year remains within § 27-35-20, and an agreement not performable
within one year after making remains within § 32-3-10.

South Carolina does state a separate rule for a later sublease. Under § 27-35-60,
a tenant's sublease without the landlord's written consent is a nullity insofar as
the landlord's rights are concerned.

Recording and third-party effect

S.C. Code § 30-7-10 draws the recording line at more than twelve months. A written
landlord-tenant lease for that longer period affects later creditors or purchasers
for value without notice only from the day and hour it is recorded in the register
of deeds or clerk of court office for the county where the property lies.

That consequence concerns third-party priority. The statute does not say that
recording is what makes the lease binding between its original parties. Section
30-5-30's acknowledgment-or-proof requirement matters when the parties seek to put
the instrument in the land records.

Effect of noncompliance

The consequences differ by defect. Section 27-35-20 calls a longer-than-one-year
agreement void unless written. Section 32-3-10 bars an action on a covered
agreement without the signed writing or memorandum it describes. Section
27-40-320 can cure one party's missing signature or delivery through performance,
but subsection (c) limits the resulting term to one year.

Nonrecording has only § 30-7-10's stated consequence against later creditors and
purchasers for value without notice. Failure to give § 27-40-420's written
identity information makes the authorized leasing person the landlord's agent for
service, notices, landlord obligations, and the retained rent described there; it
does not state that the lease becomes void.

What trips people up

One year and more than one year are different. An oral term of exactly one
year fits § 27-35-10. The writing trigger in § 27-35-20 begins only when the agreed
use or occupancy exceeds one year.

Performance cures only one year. Rent acceptance or possession and payment
can substitute for the missing signature and delivery under § 27-40-320, but a
written agreement claiming a longer term becomes effective for only one year
through that route.

Acknowledgment belongs to recording. The lease-validity statutes ask for a
writing and signature, while § 30-5-30 adds acknowledgment or proof before the
instrument enters the public land records.

Common questions

Does notarizing an oral two-year lease solve the writing problem? No. Section
27-35-20 requires the longer agreement itself to be written; notarization is not a
substitute for the writing.

Does recording fix a lease that never met the signed-writing rule? The cited
statutes treat those as separate questions. Sections 27-35-20 and 32-3-10 govern
the writing and signature, while §§ 30-5-30 and 30-7-10 govern recordability and
third-party effect.

Can the landlord's leasing agent receive court papers after omitting the owner
disclosure? Yes. Section 27-40-420 makes the nondisclosing authorized person an
agent for service of process and the other listed purposes.

Statutes and sources

• S.C. Code §§ 27-35-10, -20, -60 — oral one-year tenancy, longer-term
  writing, and written-consent rule for subleases.
  https://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t27c035.php (accessed 2026-07-30)
• S.C. Code §§ 27-40-110, -320, -420 — residential scope, performance cure,
  one-year cap, written owner/service-agent disclosure, and agency consequence.
  https://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t27c040.php (accessed 2026-07-30)
• S.C. Code § 32-3-10 — action bar, one-year performance test, signer, and
  authorized-person rule. https://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t32c003.php
  (accessed 2026-07-30)
• S.C. Code §§ 26-6-30, -50, -70, -80 — electronic scope and notice
  exclusion, party agreement, electronic equivalence, and retainable delivery.
  https://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t26c006.php (accessed 2026-07-30)
• S.C. Code § 30-5-30 — acknowledgment or proof before recording.
  https://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t30c005.php (accessed 2026-07-30)
• S.C. Code § 30-7-10 — longer-than-twelve-month lease recording and
  third-party priority. https://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t30c007.php
  (accessed 2026-07-30)