District of Columbia: Rental Application and Tenant-Screening Fee Requirements

verified against the statute 2026-07-21 4 statute sources

The short answer

The District permits one application fee with a statutory base ceiling of $50, subject to permitted annual CPI-U adjustments beginning in 2024, and bars any other prospective-tenant fee before lease signing. Before requesting screening information or money, the housing provider must make ten written or accessibly posted disclosures; same-provider applications within 30 days generally share one fee, and no-screening fees must be refunded within 14 days. A pending Council bill would require acceptance of qualifying 30-day reusable screening reports, prohibit a new screening fee when one is supplied, and require a dated report copy after screening.

Ask Ezel about your situation

This is the general rule in District of Columbia. Ezel applies current District of Columbia law to your specific facts and answers with citations to the statutes.

Pending legislation could change this.
DC B 26-0477 (26th Council Period, 2025-2026) (Referred to the Committee on Housing; public hearing held March 30, 2026; no later action or passage recorded as of July 28, 2026.): Would require housing providers to accept a qualifying tenant screening report completed within the prior 30 days, prohibit application or access fees when the report is supplied, require advance notice of those rights, and require a dated copy after any screening; a knowingly falsified or materially altered report would permit denial or a new fee. track it
Governing law and coverageD.C. Code §§ 42-3505.10 and 42-3502.22; housing-provider screening of prospective tenants for District rental units
Fees allowed or prohibitedApplication fee allowed; no other prospective-tenant fee before lease signing; same-provider applications within 30 days generally charged once unless more than one screening is required (§ 42-3505.10(b), (b-1))
Maximum charge and adjustment$50 statutory base; housing provider/agent may adjust annually beginning Jan. 1, 2024 commensurate with CPI-U increase; replacement fee shares ceiling (§ 42-3505.10(b)(1)-(4))
Permitted costs and charge timingFee may be requested only after pre-screening notice; one fee across same-provider District units applied to within 30 days unless another screening is required; refund if no screening (§ 42-3505.10(a)-(c))
Before-screening disclosuresBefore information/fee: amount, purpose, mandatory/voluntary and refundability; screening information and denial criteria; report agency/free-copy right; unit availability; response time; dispute/refund/enforcement rights (§ 42-3505.10(a)); application form adds fee and unit disclosures (§ 42-3502.22(b))
Receipt, report copy, and refundNo special payment receipt; disclose unused-fee refund right; if no screening, refund within reasonable time ≤14 days; adverse-action notice includes free copy/summary of third-party basis (§ 42-3505.10(a)(5), (9), (c), (f)(2))
Applicant-supplied or reusable reportsNo current mandatory applicant-supplied/reusable-report acceptance; same-provider applications within 30 days pay once unless multiple screenings required (§ 42-3505.10(b-1)); B26-0477 would add qualifying 30-day reusable reports
Application order and adverse actionNo first-in-order/first-qualified rule; disclose decision-response period; written adverse action by that date with grounds, third-party basis, dispute and OHR rights; written dispute response within 10 days (§ 42-3505.10(a)(7)-(8), (f)-(g))
Remedies and stronger local rulesOHR/Commission fines up to $1,000/$2,500/$5,000 by provider size, potentially doubled; alternative 1-year civil action with attorney fees/costs, incidental damages, equitable relief; District-wide law (§ 42-3505.10(h)-(i))

Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →

Fee ceiling and repeated applications

D.C. Code § 42-3505.10(b) permits a housing provider to charge an application
fee, with a statutory base ceiling of $50. Beginning January 1, 2024, the
provider or agent may adjust that ceiling annually commensurate with an increase
in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers. The statute does not
publish one mandatory adjusted dollar figure for every provider.

Before lease signing, the housing provider may not charge the prospective
tenant another type of fee. When the applicant applies within 30 calendar days
to additional District units owned or operated by the same housing provider,
subsection (b-1) requires only one application fee unless the provider must
perform more than one screening.

Disclosures before screening or payment

Before requesting any screening information or fee, § 42-3505.10(a) requires
written notice, or a posting accessible to a prospective tenant, covering:

  • each fee or deposit's amount, purpose, mandatory or voluntary status, and
    refundability;
  • the information to be accessed and the automatic and possible denial
    criteria;
  • the credit or consumer reporting agency and the free-report right after a
    denial or other adverse action;
  • expected unit availability by bedroom size and rent, or prior-year monthly
    availability if the forward-looking information is unavailable;
  • the promised response period; and
  • the applicant's dispute, unused-fee refund, OHR complaint, and civil-action
    rights.

At application, § 42-3502.22(b)(1) separately requires the Rent Administrator's
disclosure form or a suitable substitute, including the nonrefundable
application-fee amount and specified rent, surcharge, registration, violation,
ownership, mold, and Tenant Bill of Rights information.

Refund, adverse action, and dispute process

If the housing provider does not conduct a screening for any reason,
§ 42-3505.10(c) requires return of the application fee within a reasonable time
not exceeding 14 days.

An adverse action includes denial and an approval on less favorable terms or
conditions than those previously advertised or communicated. By the response
date disclosed before screening, the housing provider must give written notice
stating the specific grounds, a free copy or summary of third-party information
forming a basis for the decision, and the applicant's dispute and OHR rights.

The applicant may submit evidence that relied-on information is inaccurate,
incorrectly attributed, or based on prohibited criteria. The housing provider
must respond in writing within 10 days after receiving that information; the
response may be delivered by mail, email, or in person.

Enforcement

After an OHR probable-cause finding of a knowing violation, the Commission on
Human Rights may impose up to $1,000 for a provider with 1-10 units, $2,500 for
11-19 units, or $5,000 for 20 or more units. Half goes to the complainant. The
fine may double after more than two violations in a calendar year or failure to
implement ordered corrective action within 90 days.

Alternatively, a prospective tenant may bring a Superior Court action within
one year, but not after choosing the OHR complaint route. A prevailing tenant
is entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs, incidental damages, and
appropriate equitable relief.

What trips people up

The $50 figure is a statutory base, not necessarily every provider's current
number.
The statute permits provider-level annual CPI-U adjustments beginning
in 2024. The provider must disclose the amount before requesting information or
money.

A second unit does not always mean a second fee. Same-provider District
applications within 30 days generally share one fee, but another fee is allowed
when the provider is required to perform more than one screening.

Current law does not yet require portable reports. B26-0477 would create
that right, but it remains pending and must not be treated as settled law.

Common questions

When is a refund due if no screening happens? Within a reasonable time, and
never later than 14 days.

Must the provider explain a denial? Yes. The written notice must state the
specific grounds and include a free copy or summary of third-party information
that formed a basis for the action.

How long does the provider have to answer my dispute? Ten days after
receiving the applicant's evidence.

Can I both file with OHR and sue? The statute makes those alternative
routes; a person who files an OHR complaint may not also pursue the civil action
under this section.

Statutes and sources

  • D.C. Code § 42-3505.10(a)-(c) — disclosures, fee ceiling and adjustment,
    repeated applications, prohibited pre-lease fees, and no-screening refund.

    A housing provider may require a prospective tenant to pay an application
    fee. Such an application fee will be no more than $50.

Official source: https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/sections/42-3505.10 (accessed 2026-07-21)
- D.C. Code § 42-3505.10(f)-(g) — adverse-action notice and dispute
response.

The housing provider shall provide a written response ... within 10 days
after receipt of the information from the prospective tenant.

Official source: https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/sections/42-3505.10 (accessed 2026-07-21)
- D.C. Code § 42-3505.10(h)-(j) — administrative and civil remedies and
definitions.

“Adverse action” means ... [d]enial ... or [a]pproval ... subject to terms
or conditions different and less-favorable to the prospective tenant ...

Official source: https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/sections/42-3505.10 (accessed 2026-07-21)
- D.C. Code § 42-3502.22(b)(1) — application-stage rental-unit disclosure
form.

At the time a prospective tenant files an application to lease any rental
unit, the housing provider shall provide ... [t]he amount of any
nonrefundable application fee ...

Official source: https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/sections/42-3502.22 (accessed 2026-07-21)

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

D.C. Code § 42-3505.10(a)-(c) · accessed 2026-07-21
D.C. Code § 42-3505.10(f)-(g) · accessed 2026-07-21
D.C. Code § 42-3505.10(h)-(j) · accessed 2026-07-21
D.C. Code § 42-3502.22(b)(1) · accessed 2026-07-21
This page is general legal information about District of Columbia residential rental-application and tenant-screening charges, not legal advice about a particular application, report, denial, conditional approval, housing provider, or rental unit. The result can depend on the provider's CPI-U adjustment, whether another screening is required, the timing and content of disclosures, whether screening occurred, the information used, a dispute, the housing program, and future action on pending B26-0477. It does not cover security or holding deposits, broker commissions, recurring tenancy fees, or fully analyze whether a substantive credit, criminal-record, eviction-record, income, or other screening criterion is lawful. Federal consumer-reporting and fair-housing duties may apply in addition to District law. Verified against the official current statute text on the date shown; confirm current District requirements or consult a licensed D.C. attorney before collecting, paying, or disputing a charge.

Get the answer for your situation

You just read how District of Columbia handles this in general. Ezel applies current District of Columbia law to your facts and answers your specific question, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.