Nonprofit Director Conflict Transaction Approval Rules in Tennessee

Short answer Tennessee's nonprofit conflict rule covers specified transactions involving a director's or officer's own or related person's interest. Section 48-58-702 bars the listed interest-based equitable relief, damages, or sanctions against the director or officer if qualified directors or members take the statutory action, fairness at the relevant time is established, or the attorney general or an equity court with the attorney general joined approves the transaction.
State
Tennessee
Statute checked
October 2, 2026
Sources
6 statutes

At a glance

Governing act and covered transactionsNonprofit Corporation Act; corporation or controlled-entity transaction involving director or officer (§§ 48-58-701(2), 48-58-702)
Interest and related-person triggerPerson is party, knows own material financial interest, or knows related person is party/financially interested at relevant time (§ 48-58-701(2), (4), (7)-(8))
Disclosure and knowledgeDirector/officer discloses conflict nature and known material transaction facts; qualified directors or voting members receive requisite information (§§ 48-58-701(9), 48-58-703(a), 48-58-704(a))
Board or committee approvalMajority, at least two, qualified directors voting without other directors; committee entirely qualified and formed by statutory method (§ 48-58-703(a))
Member approval and voteMajority of votes cast by qualified memberships after notice, ownership information, and disclosure; qualified-vote majority supplies quorum (§ 48-58-704(a)-(d))
Fairness route and timeIndependent fairness route at relevant time; beneficial whole, dealings, and arm’s-length comparison; board action or legal obligation fixes time (§§ 48-58-701(3), (8), 48-58-702(b)(3))
Interested participation and quorumOther directors excluded from conflict-route deliberation/vote; qualified quorum majority, at least two; interested voters may join separate ordinary authorization (§§ 48-58-703(a), (c), 48-58-704(f))
Burden, effect, and separate authorizationListed interest-based equitable relief, damages/sanctions against director/officer barred on route; ordinary authorization may still need separate action (§§ 48-58-702, 48-58-703(c)(2), 48-58-704(f))
Special coverage and later changesAttorney general approval or equity-court approval with attorney general joined is fourth route; part effective January 1, 2015 (§ 48-58-702(b)(4); 2014 ch. 899 § 97)

Requirements one by one

Covered interests and disclosure

Section 48-58-701(2) reaches a transaction of the corporation or an entity it controls when, at the relevant time, a director or officer is a party, knows of a material financial interest, or knows a related person is a party or has such an interest. Subsection (9) calls for disclosure of the interest's existence and nature and known transaction facts a conflict-free director or officer would reasonably consider material.

Qualified director action

Under § 48-58-703(a), a majority of the qualified directors who vote, and at least two, must authorize after required or permitted modified disclosure. Other directors cannot join their deliberation or vote. A committee must consist entirely of qualified directors and meet the section's selection rule. Under § 48-58-703(c), subsection (1) separately sets the conflict-route quorum at a majority, but at least two, of all qualified directors on the board or committee.

Qualified member action

Section 48-58-704(a) uses a majority of votes cast by holders of qualified memberships after transaction notice, pre-vote identification to the vote tabulator of nonqualified memberships, and communication of required disclosure to voting members. Memberships held by the conflicted director or officer or the defined related persons are generally excluded under subsection (c)(3). A majority of votes entitled to be cast by all qualified memberships supplies the conflict-route quorum under subsection (d).

Fairness and official approval

Section 48-58-702(b) also allows the interest-based protection when fairness to the corporation is established at the relevant time, or when the attorney general and reporter approves, or an equity court approves in an action joining that official. Section 48-58-701(3) measures fairness of the transaction as a whole with attention to dealings and an arm's-length comparison. Its “relevant time” is qualified board action or, without that action, when the corporation or controlled entity becomes legally obligated (§ 48-58-701(8)).

What trips people up

The conflict vote may leave ordinary authorization unfinished. Sections 48-58-703(c)(2) and 48-58-704(f) expressly require independent action if the qualified vote fails another quorum or voting requirement in law, the charter, or bylaws. Nonqualified directors or members may participate in that separate action.

The statutory effect is bounded. Section 48-58-702 prevents the specified equitable relief or damages and sanctions against the director or officer in the listed member or corporate proceedings on the ground of the interest. It does not declare that every transaction is otherwise authorized or immune from other claims.

Common questions

Does the director or officer part apply to an ordinary nonprofit?

Yes. The 2014 enactment added §§ 48-58-701–704 to Title 48, Chapter 58 as a new part. Its effective clause made it operative January 1, 2015.

Can a committee consist of one disinterested director?

No. Section 48-58-703(a) requires at least two qualified directors to vote for the conflict route, and subsection (c)(1) also requires at least two qualified directors for its quorum.

Statutes and sources

  • Tenn. Code Ann. § 48-58-701, enacted by 2014 Pub. Ch. 899, § 54: conflicting transaction, related person, fairness, relevant time, and disclosure definitions. Official enrolled act, accessed 2026-10-02.
  • Tenn. Code Ann. § 48-58-702, enacted by § 54: interest-based remedy limits and the four listed routes. Official enrolled act, accessed 2026-10-02.
  • Tenn. Code Ann. § 48-58-703(a), (c), enacted by § 54: qualified director action, committee selection, quorum, and independent ordinary authorization. Official enrolled act, accessed 2026-10-02.
  • Tenn. Code Ann. § 48-58-704, enacted by § 54: qualified memberships, notice, disclosure, quorum, and independent ordinary authorization. Official enrolled act, accessed 2026-10-02.
  • 2014 Tenn. Pub. Ch. 899, § 97: “For all other purposes, this act shall take effect January 1, 2015.” Official enrolled act, accessed 2026-10-02.
This page gives general legal information about interested-director transactions in an ordinary domestic nonprofit corporation. It is not legal advice. The statute and governing documents may require separate authorization, and whether an interest, disclosure, vote, or transaction is fair depends on facts. Confirm current official law and seek qualified advice for a particular transaction.

What does Tennessee law mean for your facts?

You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current Tennessee law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace