Nonprofit Director Conflict Transaction Approval Rules in North Dakota

Short answer North Dakota § 10-33-46 protects a covered nonprofit director transaction from voidability based on the interest or the director’s presence if it is fair and reasonable when authorized, wins the specified informed member or board vote, or is a qualifying merger. The party asserting fairness bears that route’s burden; interested directors cannot vote or count toward the board quorum.
State
North Dakota
Statute checked
October 2, 2026
Sources
2 statutes

At a glance

Governing act and covered transactionsNonprofit Corporations Act; corporation contract/transaction involving director, family, related-organization director/family, or linked organization (§ 10-33-46(1))
Interest and related-person triggerFamily spouse/parent/child/stepchild/sibling and their specified spouses; linked organization through fiduciary role or material financial interest (§ 10-33-46(1), (3))
Disclosure and knowledgeMaterial contract/transaction facts and director interest fully disclosed or known to voting members or board/committee (§ 10-33-46(2)(b)–(c))
Board or committee approvalGood-faith majority of directors/committee members currently holding office; interested director cannot vote or count for quorum; residual voters form reduced quorum if needed (§ 10-33-46(2)(c))
Member approval and voteGood-faith two-thirds of members entitled to vote excluding interested director vote, or unanimous affirmative vote of all members whether entitled to vote or not (§ 10-33-46(2)(b))
Fairness route and timeAlternative fair and reasonable to corporation when authorized, approved, or ratified; validity proponent bears burden (§ 10-33-46(2)(a))
Interested participation and quorumInterested presence does not alone void contract, but interested director cannot vote or count toward board/committee quorum on approval route (§ 10-33-46(1), (2)(c))
Burden, effect, and separate authorizationNot void/voidable for specified relationship/presence if subsection 2 condition met; fairness route puts burden on validity proponent (§ 10-33-46(1)–(2))
Special coverage and later changesQualifying § 10-33-85 merger/consolidation is separate condition; related-organization transaction exempt from subsection 2(a)–(c) procedures (§ 10-33-46(2)(d), (4))

Requirements one by one

Who is covered and how approval works

Section 10-33-46(1) reaches a contract or transaction involving a nonprofit director, a specified family member, a related organization's director or family member, or another organization linked to the corporation's director through a role or material financial interest. Subsection (3) defines “member of the family” and clarifies material financial interests in another organization.

The board or committee route requires full disclosure or knowledge of material transaction facts and the director's interest, then a good-faith affirmative vote of a majority of directors or committee members currently holding office. An interested director cannot vote or count toward quorum. If excluding interested directors leaves fewer than the normal quorum, the remaining directors or committee members form the quorum for that transaction (§ 10-33-46(2)(c)).

The member route requires the same material facts to be fully disclosed or known, then either a good-faith two-thirds vote of members entitled to vote, without the interested director's vote, or a unanimous affirmative vote of all members, including those otherwise not entitled to vote (§ 10-33-46(2)(b)).

What trips people up

Fairness is another route, tested when the deal was authorized, approved, or ratified. The person asserting validity bears the burden of showing it was fair and reasonable to the corporation (§ 10-33-46(2)(a)). A qualifying merger or consolidation under § 10-33-85 is a separate listed condition (§ 10-33-46(2)(d)). Subsection (4) relieves transactions between related organizations from the approval and fairness procedures in subsection (2)(a)–(c); § 10-33-01(32) defines that relationship through control or common control.

Common questions

May an interested director attend the meeting?

Presence alone does not void a qualifying transaction under § 10-33-46(1). On the board approval route, the director cannot vote or count toward the quorum (§ 10-33-46(2)(c)).

Is a two-thirds member vote the only member route?

No. Section 10-33-46(2)(b) also allows the unanimous affirmative vote of all members, whether or not otherwise entitled to vote.

Statutes and sources

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

N.D. Cent. Code § 10-33-46(1)–(4) · accessed 2026-10-02
N.D. Cent. Code § 10-33-01(32) · accessed 2026-10-02
This page gives general legal information about interested-director transactions in an ordinary domestic nonprofit corporation. It is not legal advice. The statute and governing documents may require separate authorization, and whether an interest, disclosure, vote, or transaction is fair depends on facts. Confirm current official law and seek qualified advice for a particular transaction.

What does North Dakota law mean for your facts?

You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current North Dakota law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace