Nonprofit Corporation Board Action Without a Meeting in South Dakota
At a glance
| Governing law and documents | S.D. Codified Laws § 47-23-6; articles/bylaws control permission to transmit consent/signature by reasonable means |
|---|---|
| Covered actions and limits | Action required/permitted at member or director meeting, or permitted at committee meeting, under chs. 47-22–47-28 (§ 47-23-6) |
| Required consent threshold | All directors or all committee members sign, as applicable (§ 47-23-6) |
| Notice and objection | Unanimous consent under § 47-23-6; no separate consent notice or objection route stated there |
| Committee action | § 47-23-6 expressly covers committee-of-directors action; all committee members sign |
| Form, signature, and electronic method | Written consent setting forth action; if articles/bylaws permit, consent and signature may travel by mail, hand delivery, email, fax, or other reasonable means |
| Delivery and records | Document-authorized reasonable transmission; § 47-23-6 states no particular recipient or minutes-filing step |
| Effective time and revocation | § 47-23-6 states no separate effective-time, future-consent, or revocation rule |
| Legal effect and exceptions | Same force/effect as unanimous vote; may be stated in articles or document filed with secretary of state (§ 47-23-6) |
Requirements one by one
Signatures and transmission
Under § 47-23-6, every director must sign for board action, or every committee member for committee action. The consent must be in writing and set out the action. If the articles or bylaws permit it, the consent and signature may be transmitted by any reasonable means; the statute names traditional mail, hand delivery, email, and electronic facsimile as examples.
What trips people up
The express email/fax permission in § 47-23-6 is conditioned on the articles or bylaws permitting reasonable transmission. The provision does not specify a separate effective date, a recipient for delivery, or a minutes-filing step, so those mechanics should be checked in the governing documents rather than assumed from another state's procedure.
A committee may use this statutory consent route because the section expressly names a committee of directors. The consent provision does not itself grant the committee authority over every board matter; its delegated scope still matters.
Common questions
Can a majority of the directors sign instead?
No. Section 47-23-6 requires all directors for board action, or all members of the acting committee.
Does the consent have meeting-vote effect?
It has the same force and effect as a unanimous vote, and § 47-23-6 permits that effect to be stated in articles or another document filed with the secretary of state.
Statutes and sources
- S.D. Codified Laws § 47-23-6 — unanimous director and committee consent, transmission, and vote effect; accessed October 1, 2026.
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.
What does South Dakota law mean for your facts?
You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current South Dakota law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace