LLC Member Dissociation, Withdrawal, and Expulsion Requirements in North Dakota

Short answer A North Dakota LLC member has power to withdraw by express will at any time, but an express-will exit before company termination is wrongful unless the operating agreement changes the default; notice causes dissociation when the company receives it or on a stated later date. Agreement events, unanimous consent on a closed list, company-sought judicial expulsion, and specified personal, insolvency, entity, merger, conversion, domestication, and termination events also end status. Dissociation ends governance roles and future member-managed duties but creates no buyout: the former member keeps only transferee economics, prior liabilities, and limited ten-day-demand information rights.
State
North Dakota
Statute checked
August 30, 2026
Sources
8 statutes

At a glance

Governing law, member status exit, and scopeNorth Dakota Uniform LLC Act, N.D.C.C. ch. 10-32.1; ordinary domestic LLC. Covers express will, agreement/consent/court expulsion, personal and member-managed insolvency events, transactions, and consequences; member, manager, governor, and transferee remain distinct (§§ 10-32.1-01 to -02, -47 to -49)
Operating agreement, articles, and status-exit limitsOA governs member/company relations and may define exit events, expulsion, breach, and postexit obligations. Express-will notice still triggers statutory dissociation; OA may not unreasonably restrict § 10-32.1-42 information rights or vary listed court/winding-up and outsider floors (§§ 10-32.1-13, -15, -47 to -48)
Voluntary withdrawal: power, right, notice, and effective dateMember has power to dissociate at any time, rightfully or wrongfully. Company receipt of express will ends status then or on member's stated later date. No statutory writing, signature, advance period, acceptance, or consent condition; any pretermination express-will exit is wrongful unless OA changes the default (§§ 10-32.1-47(1)-(2), -48(1))
Wrongful dissociation, damages, and other liabilityWrongful for express OA breach or, before company termination, express will, judicial expulsion, member-managed bankruptcy, or specified willful entity dissolution/termination. Person owes LLC and, subject to derivative-action rule, other members caused damages plus other debts/obligations/liability (§ 10-32.1-47(2)-(3))
Agreement-based and unanimous-consent expulsionOA event or OA expulsion causes exit. Other members may unanimously expel for illegality; full transferable-interest transfer excluding security/unforeclosed charge; uncured corporate status after 90 days; or dissolved, winding-up LLC/partnership. Transfer alone otherwise does not dissociate (§§ 10-32.1-44(1), -48(2)-(4))
Judicial expulsion: applicant, procedure, and groundsOnly LLC is statutory applicant. Court may expel for wrongful conduct with adverse material effect; willful/persistent material OA or § 10-32.1-41 duty breach; or company-related conduct making continuation with person not reasonably practicable. Act states no member-filed route here (§ 10-32.1-48(5))
Death, incapacity, insolvency, entity, and transaction eventsIndividual death; in member-managed LLC only, guardian/general-conservator appointment, incapacity order, bankruptcy, creditor assignment, or consensual fiduciary appointment. Also trust/estate full-interest distribution, specified entity termination, qualifying merger, conversion, qualifying domestication, or company termination (§ 10-32.1-48(6)-(14))
Management, voting, authority, and post-exit dutiesMember management/voting end; future member-managed fiduciary duties end. Member status alone never creates agency. Dissociation removes a dual-role manager and disqualifies a dual-role governor; separate statement-of-authority effects still require review (§§ 10-32.1-23 to -24, -39(3)(f), (4)(b), -49(1))
Transferable interest, distributions, buyout, and economicsDissociation creates no automatic buyout, redemption, fair-value payment, forfeiture, or distribution. Former member owns retained transferable interest solely as transferee and receives associated distributions without governance; OA governs company/member obligations to dissociated person (§§ 10-32.1-15(2), -30, -43 to -44, -49(1)(c))
Prior liability, information, records, filings, and dissolutionPrior member debts/obligations/liability remain. Ten-day record demand gives good-faith access to membership-period information subject to member-like purpose/particularity rules. No dissociation-specific state filing; authority filings remain separate. Dissociation alone does not dissolve LLC; zero-member, consent, agreement, and court routes govern (§§ 10-32.1-02(18), -24 to -25, -42(3)-(7), -49(2), -50)

Requirements one by one

Notice causes exit, but pretermination withdrawal is wrongful by default

Under N.D.C.C. § 10-32.1-47, a member has power to dissociate at any time, rightfully or wrongfully. Section 10-32.1-48(1) makes status end when the LLC has notice of express will, or on a later date the member states. The Act sets no universal writing, signature, advance-period, acceptance, or consent condition.

The consequence is unusually strict: unless the operating agreement changes the default, every express-will withdrawal before company termination is wrongful. Agreement breach, judicial expulsion, member-managed bankruptcy, and specified willful entity exits are also wrongful. The former member is liable for caused damages in addition to other obligations.

The operating agreement controls much, but not every statutory floor

Under § 10-32.1-13, the operating agreement governs internal relations and lets the Act fill gaps. It may define dissociation events, authorize expulsion, and make a withdrawal wrongful through express breach. Section 10-32.1-15 also makes the agreement govern obligations to a person as a dissociated member or transferee, including later amendments subject to a charging-order court order.

The agreement may not unreasonably restrict § 10-32.1-42 information rights, vary specified judicial-dissolution or winding-up powers, or impair protected outsider rights. Express-will notice still causes statutory status exit; agreement breach goes to wrongfulness and liability.

Consent and court expulsion are separate routes

Under § 10-32.1-48, an agreement event or agreement-authorized expulsion causes dissociation. All other members may unanimously expel only for the listed circumstances: illegality, an entire transferable-interest transfer subject to the security and unforeclosed-charging-order exceptions, an uncured corporate-status defect after 90 days, or a dissolved and winding-up LLC or partnership.

Only the company—not another member acting alone—is the statutory applicant for judicial expulsion. The grounds are adverse material wrongful conduct; willful or persistent material agreement or § 10-32.1-41 duty breach; or conduct making continuation with the person not reasonably practicable.

Management form limits some automatic events

Individual death always causes dissociation. Guardian or general-conservator appointment, an incapacity order, bankruptcy, a creditor assignment, and the listed fiduciary appointments cause automatic exit only in a member-managed LLC. Section 10-32.1-48 separately covers trust and estate distributions, specified entity termination, merger, conversion, domestication, and company termination.

Governance roles and future duties end

Under § 10-32.1-49, member management and future member-managed fiduciary duties. North Dakota also addresses dual roles directly: under § 10-32.1-39, dissociation removes a manager who is also a member and disqualifies a governor who is also a member. Member status never creates agency by itself under § 10-32.1-23; any separate authority and § 10-32.1-24 statement still require their own review.

Economics continue without a dissociation buyout

The former member owns the retained transferable interest solely as a transferee and receives its distributions without governance rights. Under § 10-32.1-30, dissociation does not itself create a distribution. Sections 10-32.1-43 to -44 likewise make the interest personal property and preserve transferee distribution rights rather than creating a redemption, forfeiture, or fair-value payment.

Section 10-32.1-42 gives a dissociated member a narrower information right: on a ten-day demand in a record, the person may seek membership-period information in good faith under the stated purpose and particularity rules. Transferee status alone carries no such right.

Prior liability survives, and dissolution is separate

Section 10-32.1-49(2) preserves debts, obligations, and other liability incurred while the person was a member. The whole current chapter and its filed-record list in § 10-32.1-02(18) state no dissociation-specific public filing; statements of authority and denial under §§ 10-32.1-24 to -25 are separate authority records.

Dissociation also does not automatically dissolve the company. Under § 10-32.1-50, the Act separately uses agreement, unanimous consent, a 90-day zero-member period, and judicial routes. Its potential fair-value remedy is a court option in a dissolution proceeding on specified control grounds, not a dissociation buyout.

What trips people up

  • Power is not a right to leave without liability. Express-will notice ends status, while a pretermination withdrawal is wrongful by default.
  • Only the company applies for statutory judicial expulsion. Another member acting alone is not listed as an applicant.
  • Management form matters. Incapacity and insolvency events in the list are limited to member-managed LLCs.
  • Dissociation ends dual governance roles. A member-manager is removed and a member-governor is disqualified.
  • Fair value appears elsewhere. The dissolution remedy does not create an automatic cashout when member status ends.

Common questions

Must withdrawal notice be written?

Not under the statutory default. The LLC must have notice, and the operating agreement may impose an enforceable form or delivery term.

Can another member directly file the statutory expulsion application?

Section 10-32.1-48 names only the LLC as applicant. This page does not address other contract, derivative, or dissolution proceedings.

Does a former member retain company information rights?

Yes, but only through the ten-day recorded-demand route for good-faith access to information from the membership period, subject to the statutory purpose and particularity requirements.

Does dissociation require a buyout?

No. The statute converts retained economics to transferee status and says dissociation itself does not entitle the person to a distribution.

Statutes and sources

  • N.D.C.C. §§ 10-32.1-01 to -02, -13, -15, and -23 to -25 — scope, agreement control and floors, member-status agency, and authority filings. Official current chapter (accessed August 30, 2026).
  • N.D.C.C. §§ 10-32.1-30, -39, and -42 to -50 — distribution, dual governance roles, information, transfer, withdrawal, wrongfulness, dissociation events and effects, liability, and dissolution boundaries. Official current chapter (accessed August 30, 2026).

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

N.D.C.C. § 10-32.1-47 · accessed 2026-08-30
N.D.C.C. § 10-32.1-48 · accessed 2026-08-30
N.D.C.C. § 10-32.1-49 · accessed 2026-08-30
N.D.C.C. § 10-32.1-50 · accessed 2026-08-30
This page is general legal information about state-law rules for LLC member withdrawal, dissociation, expulsion, automatic status-exit events, wrongful dissociation, management and voting consequences, retained economic interests, information rights, prior liabilities, and any statutory buyout rule, not legal, business-divorce, fiduciary, employment, bankruptcy, probate, tax, securities, valuation, transaction, filing, or litigation advice. The current articles, operating agreement, member and manager roles, economic interests, prior transfers, notices, consents, court orders, authority filings, entity status, timing, and disputed facts can change whether and when status ends and what consequences follow. A statutory power to dissociate does not mean the withdrawal is rightful or liability-free, and dissociation does not necessarily produce a buyout, distribution, forfeiture, dissolution, or release from prior obligations. This survey does not decide whether conduct proves an expulsion ground, whether a withdrawal breaches an agreement, or what damages, value, or remedy applies. Verified against the cited official sources on the date shown; review the complete company record and obtain licensed advice before acting on a member-status change.

What does North Dakota law mean for your facts?

You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current North Dakota law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace