LLC Distribution Limits and Improper-Distribution Liability in New Hampshire
At a glance
| Governing law, entity, distribution, and winding-up scope | N.H. Revised LLC Act; default distribution definition covers cash/asset transfer to member but excludes nonmember-capacity transactions, service/capital-use payments, indemnification, and expense advances; includes interim and redemption/dissolution liquidating distributions. Operating agreement may change definition (§ 304-C:91) |
|---|---|
| Ordinary-course debt-payment and insolvency test | No member distribution to extent that at distribution, after giving effect, LLC could not pay debts as they become due (§ 304-C:93(I)) |
| Assets, liabilities, preferences, fair value, and exclusions | No separate asset-liability, fair-market-value, surplus, superior-preference, or excluded-liability test stated in §§ 304-C:91 to :95; statutory financial ceiling is debts-as-due test (§ 304-C:93(I)) |
| Accounting statements, valuation methods, and decision date | § 304-C:93 measures at time of distribution after giving effect; no accounting-statement, fair-valuation, reliance, projection, or alternative-method rule stated |
| Authorization, payment, redemption, debt, and delayed-payment measurement | Test applies at distribution after giving effect; §§ 304-C:91 to :95 state no separate authorization, 120-day delay, redemption/acquisition, distributed-debt, or payment-by-payment measurement rule |
| Conditional distribution debt, creditor status, parity, and subordination | Entitled member has default creditor status/remedies subject to § 304-C:93, winding-up § 304-C:141, and operating agreement; no conditional-debt exclusion, payment retest, parity, security, or subordination rule stated (§ 304-C:92) |
| Authorizer, standard, and liability to the company | §§ 304-C:91 to :95 state no separate manager/member authorizer claim, conduct standard, or liability amount; members or managers decide interim timing/aggregate amount under agreement or statutory majority defaults (§ 304-C:94) |
| Recipient knowledge, return amount, defenses, and contribution | Knowing member-recipient owes LLC only amount exceeding proper payment; unknowing member owes nothing under § 304-C:93. No contribution, impleader, or direct nonmember-recipient rule stated (§ 304-C:93(II)) |
| Limitation or repose period, accrual, and survival | §§ 304-C:91 to :95 state no special limitation/repose period, accrual rule, or dissolution/survival rule for improper-distribution recovery; no general civil period substituted |
| Tax, fiduciary, transfer, bankruptcy, creditor, and calculation boundaries | Revenue certificate required before winding-up asset distributions to members/managers; agreement may alter/eliminate duties/liability except implied-covenant violations. No transfer, bankruptcy, or calculation result here; table does not decide ability to pay, knowledge, standing, or liability (§§ 304-C:107, :115, :141) |
Requirements one by one
New Hampshire uses a single debts-as-due test
RSA 304-C:93(I) prohibits a member distribution to the extent that, at the time of payment and after giving effect to it, the company could not pay debts as they become due. Sections 304-C:91 through 304-C:95 state no separate asset- liability, superior-preference, fair-value, or surplus ceiling.
Those provisions also state no menu of accounting statements or valuation methods and no special measurement rule for authorization, delay, redemption, an interest acquisition, distribution debt, or a later debt payment. The statutory time is the distribution itself.
The knowing member owes only the unlawful excess
Under RSA 304-C:93(II), a member who knew at distribution that the payment violated the debts-as-due test is liable to the LLC only for the amount exceeding what could properly have been paid. A member who lacked that knowledge is not liable for any part of the distribution under the paragraph.
Sections 304-C:91 through 304-C:95 create no separate manager or member authorizer claim and state no contribution or impleader procedure. They also state no special limitation or repose period for improper-distribution recovery.
Entitlement creates default creditor status, not stated priority
RSA 304-C:92 gives an entitled member default creditor status and remedies, subject to the operating agreement, the financial limit, and the winding-up order. It states no distribution-debt parity, secured status, conditional-debt exclusion, subordination rule, or payment-by-payment retest.
The agreement controls several distribution mechanics
Unless the operating agreement provides otherwise, RSA 304-C:91 supplies the distribution definition and its exclusions. Section 304-C:94 gives the applicable member or manager majority the default decision over interim timing and aggregate amount. Section 304-C:95 follows the agreement for allocation and otherwise uses the agreed value of received, unreturned contributions.
Winding-up owner payments require revenue clearance
Before distributing assets to members or managers in winding up, RSA 304-C:141(I) requires the LLC or wind-up actor to obtain the Department of Revenue Administration certificate described by RSA 77-A:18. Subsection (II) then pays or adequately provides for creditors, addresses distribution liabilities, returns contributions, and distributes the remaining LLC interests in the stated agreement-controlled order.
What trips people up
- There is no balance-sheet test in the distribution section. The operative ceiling is ability to pay debts as they become due.
- Receipt alone is not enough for statutory recovery. The recipient must be a member who knew of the violation, and the measure is the unlawful excess.
- Tax clearance comes before owner distributions in winding up. It is not merely a later cancellation-filing step.
Common questions
Does a redemption count as a distribution?
By default, yes. RSA 304-C:91(III) treats a partial or complete redemption of a member's membership rights as a liquidating distribution, unless the operating agreement changes the defined terms.
Is a manager liable simply for approving an improper payment?
Sections 304-C:91 through 304-C:95 do not state a separate authorizer claim. Their express recovery rule concerns a knowing member-recipient.
Does the statute impose a special two- or three-year cutoff?
No special improper-distribution period appears in §§ 304-C:91 through :95. This page does not substitute an uncited general civil limitations period.
Statutes and sources
- RSA 304-C:91 to :95 — define distributions, state creditor status, impose the financial and recipient-liability rules, and govern interim decisions and allocation. Official §§ 304-C:91, 304-C:92, 304-C:93, 304-C:94, and 304-C:95 (accessed September 19, 2026).
- RSA 304-C:107 and :115 — state the operating-agreement duty and liability boundaries. Official § 304-C:107 and § 304-C:115 (accessed September 19, 2026).
- RSA 304-C:141 — requires revenue clearance before winding-up owner distributions and supplies the asset order. Official current text (accessed September 19, 2026).
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.
What does New Hampshire law mean for your facts?
You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current New Hampshire law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace