Landlord Entry Notice Requirements in Indiana

Short answer Indiana requires a landlord to give you "reasonable" written or oral notice before entering, and to enter only at reasonable times — but it sets no fixed number of hours. A landlord may enter to inspect, make repairs, supply agreed services, or show the unit, and no notice is needed for an emergency that threatens safety, a court order, or a unit you have abandoned. A landlord may not abuse the right of entry or use it to harass you.
State
Indiana
Statute checked
July 11, 2026
Sources
2 statutes

At a glance

Governing lawInd. Code § 32-31-5-6, in the residential landlord-tenant chapter titled 'Rental Agreements; Right of Access.' Indiana did not adopt the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act; this is its own scheme, added in 2002 and amended in 2007. Any waiver of the chapter 'by contract or otherwise, is void' (§ 32-31-5-1(c))
Advance notice required'Reasonable' notice — no fixed number of hours. The landlord 'shall give a tenant reasonable written or oral notice of the landlord's intent to enter the dwelling unit' and 'may enter a tenant's dwelling unit only at reasonable times' (§ 32-31-5-6(g)(2)-(3)). Indiana does not set 24 hours or any other figure, so what is 'reasonable' depends on the circumstances
Reasons a landlord may enterThe statute frames entry through the tenant's duty not to 'unreasonably withhold consent' to entry to: inspect the unit; make necessary or agreed repairs, decorations, alterations, or improvements; supply necessary or agreed services; or exhibit the unit to prospective or actual purchasers, mortgagees, tenants, workers, or contractors (§ 32-31-5-6(e)). This is not written as an exhaustive 'only' list the way California's is, but these are the recognized entry purposes
Permitted hours'Reasonable times' only (§ 32-31-5-6(g)(3)). The statute fixes no clock (no 'business hours' or a.m./p.m. window); reasonableness is judged by the circumstances. Emergency, court-order, and abandonment entries are not limited to reasonable times
When no notice is neededThree no-notice/no-consent cases (§ 32-31-5-6(f)): (1) 'without notice to the tenant in the case of an emergency that threatens the safety of the occupants or the landlord's property'; and without the tenant's consent (2) 'under a court order,' or (3) 'if the tenant has abandoned or surrendered the dwelling unit.' A unit is 'abandoned' only if the tenant has failed to pay or offer rent AND a reasonable person would conclude the tenant surrendered possession — a lease may not define abandonment more loosely (§ 32-31-5-6(a)-(b))
Form and delivery of the noticeNotice may be 'written or oral' and need only be 'reasonable' (§ 32-31-5-6(g)(2)). The statute lists no required contents (no date/time/purpose mandate) and no specified delivery method, unlike states with a detailed written-notice rule
Special rules for showingsNone. Showing the unit 'to prospective or actual purchasers, mortgagees, tenants, workers, or contractors' is one of the ordinary entry purposes under § 32-31-5-6(e)(4) and carries the same reasonable-notice, reasonable-times rule as any other entry. Indiana has no separate shorter-notice or oral-notice track for sale showings
Tenant's remedies for unlawful entryThe statute's own limit is that a landlord 'shall not abuse the right of entry or use a right of entry to harass a tenant' (§ 32-31-5-6(g)(1)); it sets no fixed dollar penalty for an improper entry, so a tenant's recourse is general law — a trespass claim, an injunction, and actual damages. Separately, § 32-31-5-6(c) bars a landlord from locking a tenant out or shutting off essential services except by court order (or, for services, an emergency or good-faith repair). The duty runs both ways: a tenant 'may not unreasonably withhold consent' to a lawful entry (§ 32-31-5-6(e))

Requirements one by one

Governing law

Indiana's entry rule lives in a single statute: Indiana Code § 32-31-5-6, part of the chapter on rental agreements and the landlord's "right of access." Indiana did not adopt the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, so this is the state's own, shorter scheme. One structural point matters for everything below: the chapter cannot be signed away. "A waiver of this chapter by a landlord or tenant, including a former tenant, by contract or otherwise, is void" (§ 32-31-5-1(c)) — a lease clause giving the landlord broader entry rights than the statute cannot override it.

Advance notice required

Indiana requires notice, but does not put a number on it. The landlord "shall give a tenant reasonable written or oral notice of the landlord's intent to enter the dwelling unit" and "may enter a tenant's dwelling unit only at reasonable times" (§ 32-31-5-6(g)(2)-(3)). Unlike California's 24-hour rule or Washington's two days, Indiana leaves "reasonable" undefined, so how much notice is enough depends on the circumstances — the purpose of the entry, the tenant's schedule, and how much lead time the situation allows. In practice many landlords borrow the common 24-hour convention, but the statute itself does not require it.

Reasons a landlord may enter

The statute lists entry purposes indirectly, through the tenant's side of the deal: a tenant "may not unreasonably withhold consent" to entry to inspect the unit; make necessary or agreed repairs, decorations, alterations, or improvements; supply necessary or agreed services; or exhibit the unit to prospective or actual purchasers, mortgagees, tenants, workers, or contractors (§ 32-31-5-6(e)). Indiana does not write this as an exclusive "the landlord may enter only for" list, but these are the recognized lawful reasons.

When no notice is needed

Section 32-31-5-6(f) names the situations where the landlord may skip notice or the tenant's consent: "without notice ... in the case of an emergency that threatens the safety of the occupants or the landlord's property," and "without the consent of the tenant" either "under a court order" or "if the tenant has abandoned or surrendered the dwelling unit." The emergency has to be a genuine safety threat — a fire, a burst pipe — not a convenient excuse. And "abandoned" has a strict statutory meaning: the tenant must have failed to pay or offer rent and the circumstances must lead a reasonable person to conclude the tenant gave up the unit. A lease "may not define abandonment differently" (§ 32-31-5-6(b)).

Tenant's remedies for unlawful entry

The statute's built-in limit is § 32-31-5-6(g)(1): the landlord "shall not abuse the right of entry or use a right of entry to harass a tenant." It sets no fixed dollar penalty for an improper entry, so a tenant's remedies come from general law — a trespass claim, a request for an injunction to stop repeated intrusions, and actual damages. A separate, stronger protection sits in the same section: § 32-31-5-6(c) bars a landlord from locking a tenant out or cutting off electricity, gas, water, or other essential services except by court order (or, for services, a genuine emergency or good-faith repair). The duty runs both ways — a tenant "may not unreasonably withhold consent" to a lawful, reasonably-noticed entry.

What trips people up

"Reasonable notice" is not the same as "24 hours." Indiana never fixes a number. A tenant expecting a hard 24-hour rule and a landlord assuming a phone call minutes ahead is enough can both be wrong; the test is what is reasonable for the specific entry, and a court decides if it is disputed.

A lockout or utility shutoff is a separate, more serious violation than a bad entry. Changing the locks, removing doors or appliances, or shutting off essential services to force a tenant out is prohibited by § 32-31-5-6(c) unless a court authorizes it — this is Indiana's self-help-eviction ban, not part of the entry-notice rule, and it carries its own consequences.

A lease cannot expand the landlord's entry rights. Because § 32-31-5-1(c) makes any waiver of the chapter void, a clause promising the landlord a right to enter "at any time" or "without notice" for routine visits does not hold up.

Common questions

Does my Indiana landlord have to give 24 hours' notice? No — Indiana law only requires "reasonable" written or oral notice and entry "at reasonable times" (§ 32-31-5-6(g)). It does not set 24 hours or any other fixed period, so what counts as reasonable depends on the situation.

Can my landlord come in without telling me first? Only for an emergency that threatens safety, under a court order, or after you have abandoned the unit (§ 32-31-5-6(f)). Otherwise the landlord must give reasonable advance notice.

My landlord shut off the water because I'm behind on rent. Is that allowed? No. Except by court order, a landlord may not interrupt electricity, gas, water, or other essential services (§ 32-31-5-6(c)); doing it to pressure a tenant is an unlawful self-help eviction, separate from any entry question.

Statutes and sources

  • Ind. Code § 32-31-5-6 — the right-of-access section: emergency/court-order/abandonment no-notice cases (f), the reasonable-notice and reasonable-times rule (g), the no-harassment limit (g)(1), the tenant's duty not to unreasonably withhold consent and the list of entry purposes (e), and the lockout/essential-services ban (c). https://iga.in.gov/ic/2024/Title_32/Article_31/Chapter_5.pdf (accessed 2026-07-11)
  • Ind. Code § 32-31-5-1 — makes any waiver of the chapter void (c). https://iga.in.gov/ic/2024/Title_32/Article_31/Chapter_5.pdf (accessed 2026-07-11)

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

Ind. Code § 32-31-5-6 · accessed 2026-07-11
Ind. Code § 32-31-5-1 · accessed 2026-07-11
This page is general legal information about your state's rules on a LANDLORD's right to ENTER an occupied rental under STATE law — not legal advice about your specific tenancy, and not a guide to eviction or any other landlord-tenant dispute. It states the state-law floor only; many cities and counties add their own, stricter entry rules on top of it — check local law separately. A landlord still may not remove a tenant, change the locks, or shut off utilities without a court order, whatever the entry rules say. Whether a particular entry was lawful, whether notice was adequate, and what remedies apply often turn on case-specific facts this page cannot resolve. Verified against the official statute text on the date shown; confirm current law or consult a licensed attorney in the state before relying on it.

What does Indiana law mean for your facts?

You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current Indiana law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace