Landlord Entry Notice Requirements in California

Short answer Except in a genuine emergency, a California landlord must give you at least 24 hours' written notice before entering — and may enter only for specific reasons like repairs, agreed services, an inspection, or showing the unit, and only during normal business hours. If the notice is mailed, it must go out at least six days ahead. No notice is required for a real emergency, if you are there and agree to let them in at the time, or if you have moved out. A landlord may not use the right to enter to harass you.
State
California
Statute checked
August 12, 2026
Sources
2 statutes

At a glance

Governing lawCalifornia Civil Code § 1954, in the Civil Code's hiring-of-real-property chapter. It is an EXCLUSIVE-purpose statute — 'a landlord may enter the dwelling unit only in the following cases' (§ 1954(a)) — so a lease cannot authorize broader or random entry. California is not a URLTA state; § 1954 is its own scheme, last amended in 2018 (SB 721)
Advance notice required24 hours, as a rebuttable presumption. The landlord must give 'reasonable notice in writing,' and '[t]wenty-four hours shall be presumed to be reasonable notice in absence of evidence to the contrary' (§ 1954(d)(1)). A mailed notice is presumed reasonable only if mailed 'at least six days prior to an intended entry.' The same 24-hour presumption applies to a sale showing under § 1954(d)(2)
Reasons a landlord may enterAn exclusive list (§ 1954(a)): (1) an emergency; (2) to make necessary or agreed repairs, decorations, alterations, or improvements, supply agreed services, exhibit the unit to prospective or actual purchasers, mortgagees, tenants, workers, or contractors, or make a move-out inspection under § 1950.5(f); (3) after abandonment or surrender; (4) a court order; (5) submetering purposes under § 1954.201; and (6) substandard-housing repairs under Health & Safety Code § 17973. A lease clause purporting to allow broad 'inspections' does not expand this list
Permitted hoursNormal business hours only. 'Except in cases of emergency or when the tenant has abandoned or surrendered the premises, entry may not be made during other than normal business hours unless the tenant consents to an entry during other than normal business hours at the time of entry' (§ 1954(b)); the notice subsection repeats that the landlord may 'enter only during normal business hours' (§ 1954(d)(1)). The statute does not fix an exact clock
When no notice is neededThree no-notice cases (§ 1954(e)): (1) to respond to an emergency; (2) the tenant is present and consents to the entry at the time of entry; and (3) after the tenant has abandoned or surrendered the unit. There is no general 'reasonable belief' or routine-inspection exception — random inspections are not permitted
Form and delivery of the noticeWritten, and it 'shall include the date, approximate time, and purpose of the entry' (§ 1954(d)(1)). Delivery: personally to the tenant, left with someone of suitable age and discretion at the premises, or left 'on, near, or under the usual entry door' where a reasonable person would find it; it may also be mailed (mailing at least six days ahead is presumed reasonable). One exception: for agreed repairs or services the tenant and landlord 'may agree orally' to an entry within one week, and then no written notice is required (§ 1954(d)(3))
Special rules for showingsA special oral-notice track for SALE showings (§ 1954(d)(2)): the landlord may give oral notice, in person or by phone, to exhibit the unit to prospective or actual purchasers — but only if the landlord already gave the tenant WRITTEN notice within the prior 120 days that the property is for sale and that the landlord may contact the tenant orally. Twenty-four hours is still presumed reasonable, and the landlord 'shall leave written evidence of the entry inside the unit.' Showings to prospective new tenants get no oral shortcut — they need the ordinary written 24-hour notice
Tenant's remedies for unlawful entryThe landlord 'may not abuse the right of access or use it to harass the tenant' (§ 1954(c)). A tenant facing unlawful or harassing entry can pursue civil remedies that flow from general law — invasion of privacy, trespass, an injunction, and damages, and for severe repeated intrusion a constructive-eviction or harassment claim (§ 1954 sets no fixed dollar penalty). If a tenant instead refuses a lawful entry, the landlord's remedy is not force but the court process (a 3-day notice to perform or quit, then an unlawful-detainer action or a court order)

Requirements one by one

Governing law

California's rule lives in a single statute: Civil Code § 1954. It is written as an exclusive list — "a landlord may enter the dwelling unit only in the following cases" — which means the reasons and notice in § 1954 are the whole story, and a lease cannot sign them away or add a general right to "inspect whenever." (California courts treat the tenant's privacy protection here as one a lease cannot waive.) California did not adopt the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act; § 1954 is its own scheme, last amended in 2018.

Advance notice required

For an ordinary, non-emergency entry the landlord must give "reasonable notice in writing," and the statute supplies the number: "Twenty-four hours shall be presumed to be reasonable notice in absence of evidence to the contrary" (§ 1954(d)(1)). The 24 hours is a presumption, not an absolute floor — a tenant could argue more time was reasonable in unusual circumstances, or a landlord less — but in practice 24 hours' written notice is the rule. If the landlord mails the notice instead of delivering it, it is presumed reasonable only if mailed "at least six days prior to an intended entry," which builds in transit time.

Reasons a landlord may enter

Section 1954(a) lists every lawful reason: an emergency; to make necessary or agreed repairs, decorations, alterations, or improvements, to supply agreed services, to exhibit the unit to "prospective or actual purchasers, mortgagees, tenants, workers, or contractors," or to make the security-deposit move-out inspection under § 1950.5(f); after the tenant has abandoned or surrendered the unit; under a court order; and two narrow technical purposes (utility submetering under § 1954.201 and substandard-housing repairs under Health & Safety Code § 17973(a)). Because the list is exclusive, a landlord cannot enter for a reason that isn't on it — a routine "just checking on the place" visit is not authorized.

Permitted hours

Entry is limited to "normal business hours." The statute says entry "may not be made during other than normal business hours unless the tenant consents to an entry during other than normal business hours at the time of entry" (§ 1954(b)), and the notice subsection repeats that the landlord may "enter only during normal business hours" (§ 1954(d)(1)). Emergencies and abandoned units are exempt. The statute itself doesn't define an exact clock, so "normal business hours" is read by its ordinary meaning.

When no notice is needed

Section 1954(e) names the only three situations that require no notice at all: "To respond to an emergency"; "If the tenant is present and consents to the entry at the time of entry"; and "After the tenant has abandoned or surrendered the unit." An emergency means a true one — fire, flood, a gas leak, a genuine threat to person or property — not a convenient excuse to skip notice. There is no catch-all for a landlord's hunch that something is wrong.

Form and delivery of the notice

The written notice "shall include the date, approximate time, and purpose of the entry" (§ 1954(d)(1)) — all three. It may be delivered personally to the tenant, left with "someone of a suitable age and discretion at the premises," or left "on, near, or under the usual entry door of the premises in a manner in which a reasonable person would discover the notice," and it may be mailed (with the six-day rule above). One shortcut exists: for agreed repairs or services, the tenant and landlord "may agree orally to an entry," so long as the agreement sets a date and approximate time within one week — and then "the landlord is not required to provide the tenant a written notice" (§ 1954(d)(3)).

Special rules for showings

Selling the property has its own track (§ 1954(d)(2)). To show the unit to prospective or actual purchasers, the landlord may give notice orally, in person or by phone — but only if the landlord first "notified the tenant in writing within 120 days of the oral notice that the property is for sale and that the landlord or agent may contact the tenant orally" for showings. Even then, 24 hours is still the presumed-reasonable amount, and "[a]t the time of entry, the landlord or agent shall leave written evidence of the entry inside the unit." Note the limit: this oral shortcut is for sale showings only. Showing the unit to a prospective new tenant still requires the ordinary written 24-hour notice.

Tenant's remedies for unlawful entry

The statute's backstop is § 1954(c): the landlord "may not abuse the right of access or use it to harass the tenant." Section 1954 does not set a fixed dollar penalty, so a tenant's remedies come from general law — a claim for invasion of privacy or trespass, an injunction to stop repeated intrusions, actual damages, and, where the entries are severe enough to make the home unlivable, a constructive-eviction or harassment claim. The duty runs both ways in practice: a tenant may not unreasonably refuse a lawful, properly-noticed entry, but if a tenant does refuse, the landlord's answer is the court process — a notice to perform or quit and, if needed, a court order — not forcing the door.

What trips people up

"24 hours" is a presumption, and mailing changes the math. Section 1954(d)(1) presumes 24 hours' written notice is reasonable, but a mailed notice is presumed reasonable only if sent at least six days before the entry. A landlord who drops a notice in the mail the day before has not given valid notice.

A lease cannot buy the landlord a broader right to enter. Because § 1954(a) says a landlord may enter "only in the following cases," a lease clause promising the landlord the right to inspect at will or enter for unlisted reasons does not override the statute — the enumerated list controls.

The oral-notice option is narrow. Oral notice is allowed only for (1) a sale showing after a written 120-day heads-up (§ 1954(d)(2)) or (2) an agreed repair the tenant and landlord schedule within a week (§ 1954(d)(3)). Every other entry needs the written 24-hour notice.

Common questions

Can my California landlord just show up and let themselves in? No. Except for a genuine emergency, an entry with your consent while you're there, or after you've moved out, the landlord must give at least 24 hours' written notice stating the date, time, and purpose, and may enter only during normal business hours (§ 1954(b), (d)(1), (e)).

Does my landlord need notice to enter in an emergency? No. "To respond to an emergency" is one of the three situations that require no notice at all (§ 1954(e)) — but it has to be a real emergency, like a fire or a burst pipe.

My landlord is selling the place and keeps calling to schedule showings. Is a phone call enough notice? Only if they first gave you written notice, within the last 120 days, that the property is for sale and that they may contact you by phone for showings. Then oral notice (still about 24 hours) is allowed, and they must leave written proof of the entry inside (§ 1954(d)(2)).

What can I do if my landlord keeps entering without notice? The landlord "may not abuse the right of access or use it to harass the tenant" (§ 1954(c)). You can document each entry and pursue civil remedies — invasion of privacy, trespass, an injunction, or damages — and severe, repeated intrusions can support a constructive-eviction claim.

Statutes and sources

  • Cal. Civ. Code § 1954 — the exclusive list of lawful entry reasons (a); normal-business-hours limit (b); no-harassment rule (c); the 24-hour written-notice rule, delivery methods, six-day mail rule, sale-showing oral notice, and oral agreed-repair option (d); and the three no-notice situations (e). https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1954. (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Cal. Health & Safety Code § 17973 — the multifamily exterior-elevated-element inspection duty and the owner's responsibility to comply, which § 1954(a)(6) makes an authorized entry purpose. https://www.ojai.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/2764/Bill-Text---AB-130 (accessed 2026-08-12)

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

Cal. Civ. Code § 1954 · accessed 2026-08-12
This page is general legal information about your state's rules on a LANDLORD's right to ENTER an occupied rental under STATE law — not legal advice about your specific tenancy, and not a guide to eviction or any other landlord-tenant dispute. It states the state-law floor only; many cities and counties add their own, stricter entry rules on top of it — check local law separately. A landlord still may not remove a tenant, change the locks, or shut off utilities without a court order, whatever the entry rules say. Whether a particular entry was lawful, whether notice was adequate, and what remedies apply often turn on case-specific facts this page cannot resolve. Verified against the official statute text on the date shown; confirm current law or consult a licensed attorney in the state before relying on it.

What does California law mean for your facts?

You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current California law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace