Hawaii: Lactation Break and Space Requirements
The short answer
Yes. Hawaii employers generally must provide reasonable break time each time an employee needs to express milk for one year after birth and a non-restroom location shielded from view and intrusion. Employers with fewer than 20 employees may avoid the time-and-space duties only by proving undue hardship; the law also requires employee notice, bars lactation-based job penalties, and supplies civil and agency remedies.
Ask Ezel about your situation
This is the general rule in Hawaii. Ezel applies current Hawaii law to your specific facts and answers with citations to the statutes.
| State law and federal interaction | Haw. Rev. Stat. §§ 378-91 to -93 require time, private non-restroom space, notice, and civil remedies; § 378-2(a)(7) bars lactation-based job penalties. Federal § 218d runs alongside and preserves greater state protection |
|---|---|
| Covered employers and employees | Generally 1+ employees, including Hawaii and political subdivisions; United States excluded (§ 378-91). Employer with fewer than 20 may avoid only § 378-92(a) time/space duties by proving significant-difficulty-or-expense undue hardship (§ 378-92(c)) |
| Break frequency and duration window | Reasonable break time each time the employee needs to express milk for the nursing child, for 1 year after birth (§ 378-92(a)(1)); no fixed minutes or state concurrency rule |
| Paid status and work during break | Hawaii does not label the pumping break paid; § 378-2(a)(7) bars withholding pay or penalizing a lactating employee because the employee breastfeeds or expresses milk. Federal law makes the time paid work when duties continue |
| Space location and privacy | Location other than the restroom, shielded from view and free from coworker/public intrusion, usable for expressing milk (§ 378-92(a)(2)); no statutory proximity, temporary/shared-room, priority, lock/sign, camera, or mobile-worksite detail |
| Equipment, water, cooling, and access | No Hawaii statutory chair, surface, outlet, power, sink, water, refrigerator, cooler, cleanliness, hazard, or separate availability checklist in §§ 378-91 to -93 |
| Request, notice, policy, and response | No special employee request form or employer response deadline. Every covered employer must post conspicuous accessible notice and use other appropriate means to keep employees informed of Part VII protections and duties (§ 378-92(b)) |
| Job protection, enforcement, and remedies | No refusal to hire, discharge, withheld pay, demotion, or penalty because the employee breastfeeds/expresses (§ 378-2(a)(7)). Part VII suit within 2 years: injunction, actual damages including reasonable fees, and $500 fine per violation (§ 378-93); HCRC complaint for § 378-2 discrimination within 180 days (§§ 368-11, 368-17) |
Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →
Requirements one by one
Hawaii covers employers with one or more employees
Section 378-91 defines an employer as a person with one or more employees and
includes the State, its political subdivisions, and employer agents. It excludes
the United States. The employee definition covers an individual performing
services for wages or other remuneration under an express or implied contract
for hire and expressly includes state and local public employees.
The small-employer provision is not a flat exemption. Under § 378-92(c), an
employer with fewer than 20 employees avoids the subsection (a) time-and-space
duties only if the employer proves significant difficulty or expense in relation
to its size, resources, nature, or structure. The statute does not extend that
sentence to the subsection (b) employee-notice duty.
Time is reasonable, each time needed, for one year
Section 378-92(a)(1) requires:
Reasonable break time ... for one year after the child's birth each time the
employee has a need to express breast milk.
Hawaii does not assign a fixed number of breaks or minutes and does not state a
special rule about running pumping time concurrently with another break. The
state section also does not label all pumping time paid. Federal § 218d(b)
separately treats the entire period as hours worked when the employee is not
completely relieved from duty.
The room cannot be a restroom
Section 378-92(a)(2) requires a location other than the restroom that is shielded
from view, free from intrusion by coworkers and the public, and usable for
expressing milk. The state statute does not separately prescribe proximity,
temporary or shared use, priority, a lock or sign, cameras, or mobile-worksite
arrangements.
It also contains no chair, surface, power, water, sink, refrigeration, cooling,
cleanliness, or hazard checklist. Those features should not be presented as
fixed Hawaii statutory requirements.
Employers must inform employees
Every employer covered by § 378-92 must post a notice in a conspicuous place
accessible to employees and use other appropriate means to keep employees
informed of Part VII's protections and obligations. The statute prescribes no
special employee request form, written denial, interactive-process language, or
fixed employer response deadline.
Hawaii adds job protection and two enforcement paths
Section 378-2(a)(7) makes it unlawful to refuse to hire, discharge, withhold pay
from, demote, or penalize a lactating employee because the employee breastfeeds
or expresses milk at the workplace. Section 378-2(a)(2) separately protects
opposition, complaint filing, testimony, and assistance in a proceeding under
the discriminatory-practices part.
For a violation of the express-milk part, § 378-93 permits a civil action within
two years for appropriate injunctive relief, actual damages, or both. Damages
include reasonable attorney fees, and the defendant is fined $500 for each
violation.
For the § 378-2 discrimination route, § 368-11 gives the Hawaii Civil Rights
Commission jurisdiction and generally requires a written complaint within 180
days. Under § 368-17, the commission or court may award compensatory and punitive
damages and legal or equitable relief, including hiring, reinstatement or upgrading with or without
backpay, reasonable attorney fees, and other appropriate relief.
What trips people up
Fewer than 20 employees is not an automatic state exemption. The employer
must prove undue hardship, and § 378-92(c) names only subsection (a)'s time and
space duties.
“Withhold pay” is an adverse-action rule, not a universal paid-break clause.
Section 378-2(a)(7) bars withholding pay because the employee lactates. It does
not state that every fully relieved pumping break is paid.
The Hawaii and federal room words differ slightly. Hawaii says “other than
the restroom.” Federal § 218d says “other than a bathroom.” An employer must
satisfy every applicable rule.
Common questions
Does Hawaii require a pumping-room policy in the handbook?
The statute requires conspicuous notice plus other appropriate means of keeping
employees informed. It does not specifically command a handbook section.
Can an employee sue without using the HCRC route?
Section 378-93 creates a direct civil action for a violation of the express-milk
part. The separate discrimination claim under § 378-2 follows the HCRC framework
in chapter 368.
Does the state right continue after the child's first birthday?
Section 378-92(a)(1) ends its express time entitlement one year after birth. A
different accommodation or discrimination law may require a separate analysis,
but Part VII does not state a longer pumping window.
Statutes and sources
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 378-91 — employee and employer definitions.
“Employer” means a person who has one or more employees.
Official source: https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol07_Ch0346-0398/HRS0378/HRS_0378-0091.htm (accessed 2026-07-22)
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 378-92 — time, one-year window, room, notice, and
under-20 undue-hardship rule.
An employer shall provide ... reasonable break time ... each time the
employee has a need to express breast milk.
Official source: https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol07_Ch0346-0398/HRS0378/HRS_0378-0092.htm (accessed 2026-07-22)
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 378-2(a)(2), (7) — lactation adverse-action and
opposition/participation protections.
For any employer or labor organization to refuse to hire or employ, bar or
discharge from employment, withhold pay from, demote, or penalize a lactating
employee because the employee breastfeeds or expresses milk at the workplace.
Official source: https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol07_Ch0346-0398/HRS0378/HRS_0378-0002.htm (accessed 2026-07-22)
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 378-93 — two-year civil action, relief, damages, fees,
and $500 fine.
An employee who alleges a violation of this part may bring a civil action
for appropriate injunctive relief, actual damages, or both within two years.
Official source: https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol07_Ch0346-0398/HRS0378/HRS_0378-0093.htm (accessed 2026-07-22)
- Haw. Rev. Stat. §§ 368-11 and 368-17 — HCRC jurisdiction, 180-day
complaint period, and remedies for Part I discrimination.
No complaint shall be filed after the expiration of one hundred eighty days.
Official sources: https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol07_Ch0346-0398/HRS0368/HRS_0368-0011.htm and https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol07_Ch0346-0398/HRS0368/HRS_0368-0017.htm (accessed 2026-07-22)
- 29 U.S.C. § 218d(a)-(c), (h) — federal time, space, pay, hardship, and
greater-protection rules.
Break time ... shall be considered hours worked if the employee is not
completely relieved from duty during the entirety of such break.
Official source: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title29-section218d&num=0&edition=prelim (accessed 2026-07-22)
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.
Get the answer for your situation
You just read how Hawaii handles this in general. Ezel applies current Hawaii law to your facts and answers your specific question, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.