Jury Duty Leave and Pay Requirements in Washington

Short answer Washington requires every covered public or private employer to provide sufficient leave for an employee summoned under the state jury chapter to serve. The employer may not deprive the employee of employment, threaten, coerce, harass, or deny promotional opportunities because the employee receives or responds to a summons, serves, or attends court prospectively. The leave need not be paid, and the statute states no PTO, notice, proof, or scheduling rule. Intentional violations are misdemeanors; retaliation supports damages, reinstatement, and attorney's fees.
State
Washington
Statute checked
July 13, 2026
Sources
4 statutes

At a glance

Governing lawRCW 2.36.010, 2.36.165, and 9.92.030
Jury service coveredState petit jury, grand jury, or jury of inquest under chapter 2.36 RCW; sufficient leave protects service after a chapter 2.36 summons, while job protection reaches receiving and responding to the summons, serving, and attending a Washington court for prospective service (RCW 2.36.010(2), (5); 2.36.165(1)-(2))
Employers and employees coveredAny person, association, partnership, or private or public corporation employing or controlling wages, hours, or working conditions of at least one employee (RCW 2.36.165(5)); no tenure, schedule, or classification gate stated
Time-off entitlementEmployer must provide sufficient leave of absence to serve when the employee is summoned under chapter 2.36 RCW (RCW 2.36.165(1)); separate protection bars specified adverse conduct across summons receipt, response, prospective attendance, and service (RCW 2.36.165(2))
Employer-paid wagesNone. Washington State Courts expressly states current law does not require salary continuation during jury-service absence
PTO and juror-fee treatmentNo express rule in RCW 2.36.165 on compelled or voluntary vacation, sick leave, or other PTO, and no employer-wage offset rule for court-paid juror fees
Employee notice and proofNo employee-to-employer notice deadline, written-notice form, summons-copy duty, attendance-certificate rule, or other proof requirement stated in RCW 2.36.165
Scheduling and return-to-work rulesNo night-shift rest period, same-day return rule, make-up-time rule, or work-interference limit stated in RCW 2.36.165; leave must be sufficient to serve
Job protection and remediesNo deprivation of employment, threats, coercion, harassment, or denial of promotional opportunities for protected jury activity (RCW 2.36.165(2)); intentional violation of the leave or protection rule is a misdemeanor (subsection (3)), punishable by up to 90 days and/or $1,000 when no other punishment is prescribed (RCW 9.92.030). A subsection (2) violation supports damages, reinstatement, and a prevailing employee's reasonable attorney's fee (RCW 2.36.165(4))

Sufficient leave for Washington jury service

RCW 2.36.165(1) affirmatively requires an employer to provide sufficient leave of absence for an employee summoned under chapter 2.36 RCW to serve as a juror. The chapter defines a juror as a person summoned for a petit jury, grand jury, or jury of inquest and defines an unqualified "court" as a Washington superior court or court of limited jurisdiction.

Coverage begins with an employer controlling the wages, hours, or working conditions of one employee. The definition includes a person, association, partnership, and private or public corporation and states no tenure, schedule, or worker-classification threshold.

Protection starts before actual service

The adverse-action rule reaches more than selected jurors. Under subsection (2), the employer may not deprive an employee of employment, threaten, coerce, or harass the employee, or deny promotional opportunities because the employee receives a summons, responds to it, serves, or attends court prospectively.

The leave grant and civil remedy are structured differently. Subsection (1) requires sufficient leave to serve. The express employee action for damages, reinstatement, and attorney's fees in subsection (4) applies to an act violating subsection (2).

Unpaid leave and statutory silence on PTO

Washington State Courts states that current law does not require employers to continue salary during a jury-service absence. An employer policy or collective- bargaining agreement may provide paid jury leave.

RCW 2.36.165 does not expressly say whether vacation, sick leave, or other PTO may be required or voluntarily used. It also states no juror-fee offset rule, employee notice deadline, summons-copy or proof requirement, night-shift rest period, same-day return rule, or make-up-time rule.

Criminal and civil enforcement

An employer that intentionally violates either the sufficient-leave rule or the adverse-action rule is guilty of a misdemeanor. Because RCW 2.36.165 does not prescribe a separate punishment, RCW 9.92.030 supplies up to 90 days in county jail, a fine up to $1,000, or both.

For a subsection (2) violation, the employee may sue for resulting damages and an order of reinstatement. A prevailing employee receives a reasonable attorney's fee determined by the court.

What trips people up

Washington's statute does not merely prohibit firing. It also names threats, coercion, harassment, and lost promotional opportunities.

The statute is state-system specific. Its definitions point to Washington superior courts and courts of limited jurisdiction and to petit, grand, and inquest juries under chapter 2.36 RCW; it should not be rewritten as an express federal-jury provision.

Common questions

Must a Washington employer provide time off?

Yes. The employer must provide sufficient leave for an employee summoned under chapter 2.36 RCW to serve as a juror.

Must the leave be paid?

No. Washington State Courts states that current law does not require salary continuation during jury-service absence.

Can the employer require PTO?

RCW 2.36.165 does not expressly answer that question. It states no rule for vacation, sick leave, or other paid time.

What can an employee recover for retaliation?

The employee may seek resulting damages and reinstatement, and a prevailing employee receives a reasonable attorney's fee.

Statutes and sources

  • RCW 2.36.165(1)-(5): sufficient leave, protected activity, prohibited conduct, misdemeanor, civil remedy, and employer definition — official text (accessed July 13, 2026).
  • RCW 2.36.010(2), (5): Washington-court and juror definitions — official text (accessed July 13, 2026).
  • RCW 9.92.030: default misdemeanor punishment — official text (accessed July 13, 2026).
  • Washington State Courts: no-pay rule and employer overview — official guidance (accessed July 13, 2026).

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

RCW 2.36.165(1)-(5) · accessed 2026-07-13
RCW 2.36.010(2), (5) · accessed 2026-07-13
RCW 9.92.030 · accessed 2026-07-13
This page is general legal information about state-law workplace rights for employees summoned for or serving on a jury, not legal advice about your summons, pay, leave balance, or employment dispute. Jury-service coverage, employee classification, employer size, notice, work schedule, and the court involved can change the result. Court-paid juror fees are different from wages an employer may owe, and separate rules govern witnesses, subpoenas, public employees, and local leave ordinances. Verified against the official statute text on the date shown; confirm current law or consult the court, state labor agency, or a licensed attorney before relying on it.

What does Washington law mean for your facts?

You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current Washington law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace