Nevada: Employee Personnel File Access Requirements
The short answer
Nevada gives employees and workers referred by a labor organization a reasonable opportunity during usual business hours to inspect covered employment records and requires copies on request. The statute covers qualification and disciplinary information, including termination, but excludes prior-employer confidential reports, confidential investigations, and criminal-history material. Former employees have a 60-day post-termination access window; no employee or former employee gets copies unless employment lasted more than 60 days. Charges are limited to actual cost, and the worker may add a reasonable written explanation and challenge inaccurate or incomplete information in writing.
Ask Ezel about your situation
This is the general rule in Nevada. Ezel applies current Nevada law to your specific facts and answers with citations to the statutes.
| Governing law | NRS 613.075; reasonable business-hours inspection, requested copies, actual-cost cap, written explanation/challenge, and 60-day former-worker window |
|---|---|
| Who may request the file | Current employees, former employees within 60 days after termination, and persons referred for work by a labor organization; copy eligibility requires more than 60 days of employment (NRS 613.075(1), (4), (7)) |
| Records covered | Employer records used to determine employee qualifications or disciplinary action, including termination; labor-organization records concerning the referred person's position on past, present, and future referral lists (NRS 613.075(1)) |
| Excluded or redacted records | Confidential reports from previous employers or investigative agencies, other confidential investigative files/information, and information concerning the person's investigation, arrest, or conviction for violating law (NRS 613.075(1)) |
| How to request and verify authority | Request required but no writing, notarization, or ID-copy formality stated for access/copies; accuracy challenge must be written, and employer may prescribe the format of an employee explanation (NRS 613.075(1)-(2), (6)) |
| Response deadline and inspection location | Reasonable opportunity during usual business hours; no fixed day count or specific inspection location. Former-worker inspection must occur within 60 days after termination (NRS 613.075(1), (4)) |
| Copy, mailing, and cost rights | Copies required on request and charge limited to actual cost of access/copies; no copies unless employment lasted more than 60 days (NRS 613.075(1)(b), (5), (7)) |
| Correction or employee rebuttal | Worker may submit a reasonable written explanation directly responding to a written entry; it must be maintained in the records. Written inaccuracy/incompleteness challenge requires correction if employer/labor organization finds it valid (NRS 613.075(2), (6)) |
| Former-worker limits and enforcement | Inspection/copy request window ends 60 days after termination; copies require more than 60 days' employment. Secret employment records prohibited, but § 613.075 states no retention period, request cap, agency penalty, or express private remedy (NRS 613.075(3)-(4), (7)) |
Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →
Records covered and excluded
NRS 613.075 covers records used to determine an employee's qualifications and
disciplinary action, expressly including termination. It also covers a labor
organization's records of a referred worker's position on past, present, and
future referral lists.
The statute excludes confidential reports from previous employers or
investigative agencies, other confidential investigative files and information,
and information concerning an investigation, arrest, or conviction for a legal
violation.
Inspection, copies, and cost
After a request, the employer or labor organization must provide a reasonable
opportunity to inspect during usual business hours and furnish copies. The
statute does not impose a fixed numerical deadline or name a required
inspection location.
Charges may not exceed the actual cost of providing access and copies. A
separate tenure condition applies: no employee or former employee may receive
copies unless the employment lasted more than 60 days. That limitation is on
copies, not the current employee's inspection right.
Explanation, accuracy challenge, and former workers
The worker may submit a reasonable written explanation directly responding to
a written entry. The employer may prescribe its format, and the explanation
must be maintained in the employment records.
A worker who contends information is inaccurate or incomplete must notify the
employer or labor organization in writing. If it finds the contention correct,
it must change the information. This gives a correction route but does not
guarantee that every disputed entry will be amended.
After termination, inspection must occur within 60 days, and a copy request
must be made within that period. Section 613.075 prohibits secret employment
records but states no longer retention period, request cap, agency penalty, or
express private remedy.
What trips people up
Nevada does not state a seven-day response deadline. The current-worker rule is
a reasonable opportunity during usual business hours; the 60-day number is the
former employee's post-termination window.
The more-than-60-days condition governs copies. An employee with shorter tenure
still has the statutory inspection language, but not a right to be furnished a
copy under subsection 7.
The written explanation and accuracy challenge are distinct. The explanation
must be maintained as the worker's response; the employer changes disputed
information only if it finds the written contention correct.
Common questions
Must the initial access request be written?
NRS 613.075 requires a request but does not state that the initial request must
be written. A challenge asserting inaccurate or incomplete information must be
in writing.
Can a former employee request the file after 60 days?
Not under the express former-worker provision. Subsection 4 limits the
post-termination inspection and copy period to 60 days.
Must my written response accompany a later third-party disclosure?
The statute says the explanation must be maintained in the employment records;
it does not expressly say that the explanation must accompany every later
third-party transmission.
Statutes and sources
- NRS 613.075(1)-(3): covered and excluded records, inspection, copies, written
explanation, and secret-record prohibition —
official text
(accessed July 12, 2026). - NRS 613.075(4)-(7): former-worker window, actual-cost cap, accuracy challenge,
and 60-day tenure condition for copies —
official text
(accessed July 12, 2026).
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.
Get the answer for your situation
You just read how Nevada handles this in general. Ezel applies current Nevada law to your facts and answers your specific question, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.