Hawaii: Employee Expense Reimbursement Requirements

verified against the statute 2026-07-14 7 statute sources

The short answer

Hawaii has no general statute requiring reimbursement of every necessary employee business expense. HRS § 388-6 instead bars covered employers from making employees bear specified costs and losses, including employer-requested or legally required medical examinations, fines, certain shortages and breakage, and certain business losses not caused by the employee's willful disregard. Chapter 388 is enforced by the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations and supplies penalties and wage remedies where unpaid wages are proven.

Ask Ezel about your situation

This is the general rule in Hawaii. Ezel applies current Hawaii law to your specific facts and answers with citations to the statutes.

Governing law and coverageNo general business-expense mandate; HRS §§ 388-1 and 388-6 cover private employers and employees, exclude the State and political subdivisions, and bar shifting listed costs or losses
Reimbursable expense standardNo general necessary or reasonable expense test; employee cannot be made to bear employer-requested or legally required medical-exam/report expenses or the other losses listed in § 388-6
Authorization, direction, and primary benefitMedical rule applies when employer or prospective employer requests or requires the exam/report, or law or regulation requires it; no general primary-benefit, preapproval, or ratification test
Excluded losses and employee faultEmployee cannot bear fines; specified cash shortages; breakage fines, penalties, or replacement costs; discretionary bad checks; or listed business losses unless attributable to willful or intentional disregard (§ 388-6(1)-(5))
Request deadline and documentationNo expense request, receipt, itemization, certification, submission deadline, or missing-document substitute; one-year limit applies only to director acceptance of an assigned unpaid-wage claim (§ 388-11(b))
Employer policy, preapproval, and capsWritten authorization cannot validate the costs and losses § 388-6 says may not be authorized or borne by the employee; Chapter 388 generally cannot be waived by private agreement (§ 388-8)
Payment deadline, method, and interestNo separate reimbursement clock, payroll method, advance procedure, stipend, or interest rule for out-of-pocket expenses; wage interest is 6% from due date only when unpaid wages are legally proven (§§ 388-10, 388-11)
Enforcement and remediesDLIR director enforces and may investigate and sue; chapter violation penalty is at least $500 or $100 per violation, whichever is greater; proven unpaid wages carry an equal sum plus 6% interest, with costs and attorney fees in an employee action (§§ 388-9 to 388-11)

Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →

Requirements one by one

Hawaii protects specified costs and losses, not every business expense

The current Chapter 388 wage-payment scheme does not state a general rule that
an ordinary private employer must repay every necessary or reasonable employee
business expense. Haw. Rev. Stat. § 388-6 instead forbids making an employee
bear six listed categories of costs and losses.

One category is the cost of a medical or physical examination or medical report
for an employee or applicant when the employer or prospective employer requests
or requires it, or when federal, state, or local law or regulation requires it.
The section does not create a general mileage, travel, phone, home-office, tool,
supply, or uniform reimbursement right.

The statute also assigns specified business losses to the employer

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 388-6(1)-(5) says an employee may not be made to bear fines;
specified cash shortages; fines, penalties, or replacement costs for breakage;
losses on dishonored checks when the employee had discretion to accept or
reject the check; or listed losses involving workmanship, property, or customer
payment unless attributable to the employee's willful or intentional disregard
of the employer's interest.

That last fault standard is limited to the losses named in subsection (5). It is
not a general negligence rule for every expense or loss connected to work.

Written consent cannot shift the protected items

Section 388-6 permits some wage deductions or retentions when authorized in
writing, but then states that its six listed categories may not be authorized or
required to be borne by the employee. Haw. Rev. Stat. § 388-8 also provides that
Chapter 388 generally may not be set aside by private agreement.

The statute states no expense-report form, receipt requirement, submission
deadline, reimbursement cap, payment clock, advance procedure, or stipend
method for the protected costs.

Enforcement depends on whether unpaid wages are involved

Under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 388-9(a), the Director of Labor and Industrial Relations
enforces Chapter 388, may investigate alleged violations and hold hearings, and
may bring actions for penalties.

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 388-10(a) imposes a chapter-violation penalty of at least $500
or $100 for each violation, whichever is greater. If unpaid wages are legally
proven, the employer may also owe an equal sum plus 6% annual interest from the
date the wages were due.

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 388-11(a)-(c) allows an employee action for unpaid wages and
provides 6% interest, costs, and reasonable attorney's fees. The director
generally may accept an assignment of a covered unpaid-wage claim only within
one year after the wages became due. These wage remedies do not state a separate
damages formula for an out-of-pocket examination cost that was not taken from
wages.

What trips people up

Section 388-6 is broader than a simple payroll-deduction rule because it says the
listed costs may not otherwise be “required to be borne” by the employee. But it
is still a category-specific protection, not a universal necessary-expense
statute.

Coverage also matters. Haw. Rev. Stat. § 388-1 excludes the State, its political
subdivisions, and the United States from the chapter's employer definition.
Public-employee travel and collective-bargaining rules are outside this survey's
ordinary private-sector scope.

Common questions

Must a Hawaii employer reimburse ordinary business mileage?

No general private-sector mileage right or rate appears in the current Chapter
388 provisions reviewed for this topic. Public travel schedules, tax rules, and
workers' compensation mileage answer different questions.

Who bears the cost of a required employment medical examination?

The covered employee or applicant may not be required to bear it when the
employer requests or requires the examination or report, or when law or
regulation requires it, under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 388-6(6).

Can an employee agree in writing to pay for a protected loss?

No. Section 388-6 says its listed costs and losses may not be authorized or
required to be borne by the employee, and § 388-8 generally bars private waiver
of Chapter 388.

Is every loss caused by an employee protected?

No. For the workmanship, property, customer-credit, and nonpayment losses listed
in § 388-6(5), the protection does not apply when the loss is attributable to
the employee's willful or intentional disregard of the employer's interest.

Statutes and sources

  • Haw. Rev. Stat. §§ 388-1 and 388-6. Define chapter coverage and identify
    the costs and losses that may not be shifted to an employee. Definitions
    and protected items,
    accessed July 14, 2026.
  • Haw. Rev. Stat. §§ 388-8 and 388-9. Supply the nonwaiver rule and agency
    enforcement authority. Nonwaiver
    and enforcement,
    accessed July 14, 2026.
  • Haw. Rev. Stat. §§ 388-10 and 388-11. State the chapter penalties and
    unpaid-wage remedies. Penalties
    and employee remedies,
    accessed July 14, 2026.
  • Haw. Rev. Stat. ch. 388. The official chapter index identifies the wage-
    withholding, nonwaiver, enforcement, penalty, and remedy sections. Official
    chapter index
    ,
    accessed July 14, 2026.

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 388-1 · accessed 2026-07-14
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 388-6 · accessed 2026-07-14
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 388-8 · accessed 2026-07-14
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 388-9(a) · accessed 2026-07-14
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 388-10(a) · accessed 2026-07-14
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 388-11(a)-(c) · accessed 2026-07-14
Haw. Rev. Stat. ch. 388 index · accessed 2026-07-14
This page is general legal information about state-law reimbursement of employee business expenses, not legal advice about a purchase, mileage claim, remote-work arrangement, reimbursement policy, or wage claim. The result can depend on whether the expense was necessary, reasonable, authorized or required, primarily for the employer's benefit, documented on time, and within valid policy limits. Separate federal, state, and local rules govern minimum wages, tax treatment, public-employee travel, workers' compensation, wage deductions, and independent contractors. Verified against the official statute, regulation, or agency material on the date shown; confirm current law or consult the state labor agency or a licensed attorney before relying on it.

Get the answer for your situation

You just read how Hawaii handles this in general. Ezel applies current Hawaii law to your facts and answers your specific question, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.