Default Health-Care Surrogate Priority in Rhode Island

Short answer Rhode Island’s health-care and adult-guardianship statutes checked here do not set a general spouse-to-children default surrogate order. They provide for a patient-appointed health-care agent and a guardian with court-defined authority. The terminal-care MOLST law recognizes a decision maker already authorized by law or by the patient; it does not itself choose one relative over another.
State
Rhode Island
Statute checked
October 8, 2026
Sources
9 statutes

At a glance

When the default route opensNo general default family trigger in the checked health and guardianship provisions; MOLST decision maker must already be authorized by law or patient (§§ 23-4.11-2(7), 23-4.11-3.1(b)(2)).
Care or setting coveredGeneral care consent belongs to the patient or appointed agent; terminal-care MOLST provision covers qualified patient and life-sustaining orders (§§ 23-4.6-1(a), 23-4.10-2, 23-4.11-2(16), 23-4.11-3.1).
Guardian or appointed agentPatient-appointed health-care agent has document-granted authority; court-appointed guardian acts within order and best-interest duty (§§ 23-4.10-2, 33-15-8, 33-15-29).
Family and partner orderNo spouse, child, parent or sibling ranking supplied by the checked health-care and guardianship provisions (§§ 23-4.10-2, 23-4.11-2(7), 33-15-8).
Friend or other nonfamily personNo default close-friend class in the checked provisions; an individual may designate an agent (§§ 23-4.10-2, 23-4.11-2(7)).
Decision within one classNo same-rank vote is prescribed by the checked provisions because they do not create ranked family classes (§§ 23-4.10-2, 23-4.11-2(7)).
Who is available and eligibleMOLST decision maker must have authority from law or patient; limited guardian has only order-granted authority (§§ 23-4.11-2(7), 33-15-8).
Decisions limited or excludedMOLST authority concerns qualified terminal patients; a recognized maker may sign when capacity is lacking; guardian acts for ward’s best interest (§§ 23-4.11-2(16), 23-4.11-3.1(b)(2), (d)(2), 33-15-29).
No surrogate or disputed authorityChecked statutes supply no family tie-break or clinician appointment rule; guardian authority depends on court order (§§ 23-4.11-2(7), 33-15-8).

Requirements one by one

What the statutes provide

Section 23-4.6-1(a) recognizes an individual's consent to routine, emergency, medical or surgical care. A person who has designated a health-care agent gives that agent decision authority through the statutory power-of-attorney form (§ 23-4.10-2). The adult guardianship chapter says a limited guardian has only the authority stated in the order, (§ 33-15-8), and a guardian authorized to decide for the person must act in the ward's best interest (§ 33-15-29).

The terminal-care chapter defines a “healthcare decision maker” as someone authorized by law or by the qualified patient (§ 23-4.11-2(7)). Such a maker may execute a MOLST form when the qualified patient lacks capacity, with the required clinician signature (§ 23-4.11-3.1(b)(2), (d)(2)). This definition points to authority already established elsewhere; it does not rank relatives.

What trips people up

The MOLST rule names a “recognized healthcare decision maker” but does not itself give every spouse or adult child authority. Before treating a relative's signature as sufficient, the underlying source of that person's authority must be identified (§§ 23-4.11-2(7), 23-4.11-3.1(d)(2)).

Common questions

Does a spouse automatically outrank adult children under these provisions?

The cited health-care and guardianship provisions do not prescribe that family order. The statutory agent route depends on designation, while a limited guardian's authority comes from the court order (§§ 23-4.10-2, 33-15-8).

Can a MOLST form create a new default family surrogate?

No priority class is created by the MOLST signing rule. It calls for the qualified patient or a recognized decision maker and a qualified provider to sign (§§ 23-4.11-2(7), 23-4.11-3.1(d)(2)).

Statutes and sources

  • R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 23-4.6-1, 23-4.10-2, 23-4.11-2, 23-4.11-3.1, 33-15-8 and 33-15-29 — current official provisions linked in the statute entries above, accessed 2026-10-08.
  • Official Title 23 index and Title 33 index, plus the indexed chapters on health-care powers of attorney, terminal-care declarations and adult guardianship, checked 2026-10-08 to bound the absence finding.

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

R.I. Gen. Laws § 23-4.6-1 · accessed 2026-10-08
R.I. Gen. Laws § 23-4.10-2 · accessed 2026-10-08
R.I. Gen. Laws § 23-4.10-2 · accessed 2026-10-08
R.I. Gen. Laws § 23-4.11-2 · accessed 2026-10-08
R.I. Gen. Laws § 23-4.11-2 · accessed 2026-10-08
R.I. Gen. Laws § 23-4.11-3.1 · accessed 2026-10-08
R.I. Gen. Laws § 23-4.11-3.1 · accessed 2026-10-08
R.I. Gen. Laws § 33-15-8 · accessed 2026-10-08
R.I. Gen. Laws § 33-15-29 · accessed 2026-10-08
This page summarizes default health-care decision rules, not advice about an individual patient. Capacity, existing directives, the care setting, and urgent treatment can change who may decide. Check current official law and obtain professional advice for a specific decision.

What does Rhode Island law mean for your facts?

You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current Rhode Island law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace