Default Health-Care Surrogate Priority in Louisiana
At a glance
| When the default route opens | When adult cannot consent personally and no higher class is reasonably available, willing, and competent (§ 40:1159.4(A)). |
|---|---|
| Care or setting covered | Any physician-directed surgical or medical treatment or procedure not prohibited by law, including autopsy (§ 40:1159.4(A)). |
| Guardian or appointed agent | Judicially appointed tutor or curator, then agent under a valid mandate expressly authorizing health-care decisions (§ 40:1159.4(A)(2)–(3)). |
| Family and partner order | Spouse not judicially separated; adult child; parent; sibling; other ascendants or descendants (§ 40:1159.4(A)(4)–(8)). |
| Friend or other nonfamily person | Qualifying adult friend after family, with signed facility acknowledgment; separate developmental-disability team choices follow (§ 40:1159.4(A)(9), (11)–(12)). |
| Decision within one class | Majority of class members available for consultation in classes (A)(1)–(9) (§ 40:1159.4(B)). |
| Who is available and eligible | Higher class must be reasonably available, willing, competent; adult friend must know patient’s views and sign and date facility acknowledgment (§ 40:1159.4(A)). |
| Decisions limited or excluded | Authority is consent to physician-directed treatment not prohibited by law; developmental-disability team routes have their own selection votes (§ 40:1159.4(A)(11)–(12)). |
| No surrogate or disputed authority | Attending physician may act after no (A)(1)–(10) person is reasonably available, with documented search and second-physician confirmation; emergencies have implied consent (§§ 40:1159.4(C)–(D), 40:1159.5). |
Requirements one by one
The consent order
Under § 40:1159.4(A), the adult's own consent comes first. If the adult cannot give it, the order starts with a judicially appointed tutor or curator and an agent under a valid mandate that specifically authorizes health-care decisions. It then lists a spouse who is not judicially separated, an adult child, a parent, a sibling, and other ascendants or descendants. A person in the next class may consent only if no one in a prior class is reasonably available, willing, and competent. The consent covers physician-directed surgical or medical treatment and procedures, including an autopsy, if not prohibited by law.
An adult friend follows those relatives under § 40:1159.4(A)(9). The friend must have shown special care and concern, generally know the patient's health-care views, and be willing and able to act in the patient's best interest. The friend signs and dates a hospital or facility acknowledgment for the medical record. The later paragraphs (A)(11)–(12) provide separate team-selected decision makers for an individual with a developmental disability, with their own selection procedures.
People of equal rank
Section 40:1159.4(B) says a majority of class members available for consultation gives consent when more than one person falls within a class in (A)(1) through (9). Thus, finding one adult child does not by itself settle a decision if other adult children are available for consultation.
Clinician fallback and emergency
Under § 40:1159.4(C), if no person in (A)(1) through (10) is reasonably available, the attending physician may provide treatment or decide on continued services, including placement or transfer. The physician records the needed decision, why delay is inappropriate, and attempts to obtain authorized consent, then obtains a second physician's examination and confirmation. Section 40:1159.4(D) adds search documentation when no contact is listed and records attempted contacts when names are known. This nonemergency process does not apply to an emergency governed by § 40:1159.5(A)–(B), which allows implied consent under its medical-necessity and delay conditions.
What trips people up
The adult friend is a statutory class, but § 40:1159.4(A)(9) requires the facility acknowledgment and familiarity with the patient's wishes. Merely knowing the patient is not enough.
The physician fallback is tied to unavailability, not a general choice between relatives and clinicians. Section 40:1159.4(C) requires the documented steps and a second physician's personal examination before the proposed nonemergency procedure.
Common questions
Can one adult child consent when siblings disagree? Under § 40:1159.4(B), a majority of available adult children in that class must give consent.
Does a mandate need to mention health care? Yes. Section 40:1159.4(A)(3) places an agent in the order only when a valid mandate specifically authorizes health-care decisions.
What if the patient needs care immediately? Section 40:1159.5(A) implies consent when treatment is reasonably necessary, no authorized person is readily available, and delay could jeopardize life or health, disfigure the patient, or impair faculties. Paragraph (B) separately addresses transfer from a licensed facility to a hospital.
Statutes and sources
Verbatim official excerpts, section URLs, and access dates are in the source fields above.
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.
What does Louisiana law mean for your facts?
You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current Louisiana law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace