Data Breach Notice to Residents and State Authorities in Michigan

Short answer An owner or licensee of computerized personal information must notify Michigan residents whose information was accessed and acquired, unless an ordinarily prudent assessment finds substantial loss, injury, or identity theft unlikely. Notice goes without unreasonable delay; current law states no numbered resident deadline or routine Attorney General filing. A nonowner database maintainer tells the owner, and more than 1,000 resident notices generally trigger nationwide consumer-reporting-agency notice.
State
Michigan
Statute checked
October 14, 2026
Sources
4 statutes
Pending legislation could change this.
MI SB 360 (2025-2026) (Passed Senate and referred to House Government Operations August 26, 2025): Would expand the covered data and breach tests, impose a 45-day outside resident-notice period after breach determination, and add Attorney General reporting for notices to at least 100 residents. track it Status checked October 14, 2026.

At a glance

Covered entity and service providerOwner/licensee: resident notice; nonowner database maintainer: owner/licensor notice, both subject to risk screen (§ 445.72(1)-(3))
Breach and covered informationUnauthorized access AND acquisition of computerized name plus SSN, state ID, or financial credentials; encrypted data with key also count (§§ 445.63(b), (e), (r), 445.72(1))
Risk screen or notice exceptionOrdinarily prudent assessment may find no likely substantial loss/injury or identity theft; narrow good-faith employee exclusion (§§ 445.63(b), 445.72(1)-(3))
Individuals who receive noticeMichigan residents whose unencrypted/unredacted information was accessed and acquired, or whose encrypted information and key were acquired (§ 445.72(1))
Individual notice deadline and clockWithout unreasonable delay after discovery or owner notification; scope/integrity and law-enforcement delays; no numeric outside limit (§ 445.72(1), (4))
Regulator threshold and deadlineNo routine AG incident filing in current § 445.72; AG may sue for civil fine on knowing failure to notify (§ 445.72(1)-(18))
Consumer-reporting-agency noticeMore than 1,000 Michigan residents notified: tell nationwide agencies notice count and timing without unreasonable delay afterward; GLBA exception (§ 445.72(8))
Individual delivery and contentMail; qualifying email; live consented phone or fallback mail/email; clear breach, data type, protective steps, help number, fraud vigilance (§ 445.72(5)-(6))
Substitute notice conditions and channelsDirect-notice cost over $250,000 or over 500,000 Michigan residents; email if available, website if maintained, and statewide media together (§ 445.72(5)(d))
Delays and alternate complianceScope/integrity work or agency-determined investigation/security delay, then prompt notice; qualifying financial or HIPAA compliance may satisfy (§ 445.72(4), (9)-(10))

Requirements one by one

Covered breach and information

Under § 445.63(b), a breach requires unauthorized access and acquisition of computerized information in a database covering multiple people. Section 445.63(r) limits covered data to a name linked to a Social Security number, driver license or state ID number, or financial account number with the credential needed to reach the account. An employee's good-faith access is excluded only if business-related, without misuse or unauthorized disclosure. Under § 445.72(1), an unauthorized person acquiring encrypted information along with access to its key can also trigger notice.

Risk screen and recipients

The owner or licensee may withhold notice if it determines the breach has not caused or is not likely to cause substantial loss, injury, or identity theft to a Michigan resident. Section 445.72(3) requires the care of an ordinarily prudent person or agency in that decision. Otherwise, residents whose unencrypted, unredacted information was accessed and acquired, or whose encrypted information was accessed and acquired with the key, receive notice. A nonowner database maintainer gives the owner or licensor notice under subsection (2), subject to the same risk screen.

Timing and nationwide agencies

Under § 445.72(4), notice goes without unreasonable delay after discovery or owner notification. Scope and restoration measures can justify a delay, with notice following promptly when they end. A law-enforcement agency can also determine that notice would impede a criminal or civil investigation or jeopardize homeland or national security; notice follows its clearance.

After more than 1,000 Michigan resident notices, § 445.72(8) requires notice to nationwide consumer-reporting agencies without unreasonable delay, giving the number and timing of resident notices. That route does not apply to a person or agency subject to the cited federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley provisions.

Delivery and substitute notice

Under § 445.72(5), mail and email are allowed under the listed consent, relationship, or internet-business conditions. Telephone notice must be live, not recorded; without prior telephone consent, an unsuccessful live connection within three business days calls for mail or qualifying email as well. The letter or call gives a general breach description, affected data type, protective steps if applicable, a help number, and a fraud-vigilance reminder under subsection (6). For direct-notice cost above $250,000 or more than 500,000 Michigan residents, substitute notice combines available email, a website post if maintained, and major statewide media.

What trips people up

No routine AG report is stated in current § 445.72. Its subsection (13) lets the Attorney General or a prosecutor pursue a civil fine for a knowing notice failure. That enforcement power is separate from the recipient duties in subsections (1), (2), and (8).

Federal compliance routes are conditional. Section 445.72(9)-(10) treats specified financial-institution notification procedures or HIPAA compliance as compliance with this section. Entity type alone does not establish that the stated requirements have been met.

Common questions

Is there a 45-day current deadline? No. Current § 445.72(4) says “without unreasonable delay.” Pending S.B. 360 proposes a 45-day outside period measured from breach determination; the official action record lists it in House Government Operations.

Can a recorded phone message serve as notice? Section 445.72(5)(c) bars notice given in whole or in part by recorded message.

Statutes and sources

  • Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 445.63(b), (e), (r), 445.72(1)-(10), (13) — data, trigger, risk screen, recipients, clocks, delivery, and agency notice. https://www.legislature.mi.gov/Laws/MCL?objectName=mcl-445-72 (accessed 2026-10-14)

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.72(5), (6) · accessed 2026-10-14
This page gives general information about state data-breach notice law, not legal advice about an incident. The information involved, number and residence of affected people, the entity's role, dates of discovery and determination, and any law-enforcement request can change the duties and deadlines. Other state, federal, and industry rules may also apply. Check current law and consult qualified counsel before sending a notice.

What does Michigan law mean for your facts?

You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current Michigan law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace