Corporate Stock-Transfer Restriction and Certificate-Legend Requirements in Montana

Short answer Montana permits a share-transfer restriction in the articles, bylaws, an agreement among shareholders, or an agreement between shareholders and the corporation, and expressly permits those instruments to alter or eliminate the judicial-dissolution purchase election in § 35-14-1434. Earlier shares require party status or a favorable vote, while certificate or information-statement notice ordinarily controls enforcement against a person without knowledge. A qualifying unanimous shareholder agreement has its own certificate-recall and purchaser-rescission rules, and Montana's current UCC issuer-restriction rule is § 30-8-214, not repealed § 30-8-204.
State
Montana
Statute checked
August 26, 2026
Sources
8 statutes

At a glance

Governing law, security, holder, and scopeMont. Code Ann. §§ 35-14-626 to -627, 35-14-732, 35-14-1434, 30-1-210, and 30-8-214; ordinary domestic corporation; transfer/registration restrictions and restriction of § 35-14-1434 purchase-election application; shareholder, transferee, purchaser, person, and registered owner; shares include convertible and subscription/acquisition-right securities
Authorized instrument, actor, and adoptionGeneral: articles, bylaws, shareholder agreement, or shareholder-corporation agreement; same instruments may alter/eliminate § 35-14-1434 application. Qualifying § 35-14-732 agreement: articles/bylaws approved by all current shareholders or written agreement signed by all and made known to corporation
Existing shares, holder consent, and effectGeneral restriction: earlier-issued share requires holder agreement-party status or favorable vote. § 35-14-732 agreement requires all current shareholders and ordinarily all-current-shareholder amendment; no separate renewed-assent route stated (§§ 35-14-627(1), 35-14-732(2))
Offer, purchase, consent, and prohibited-transferee termsFirst offer and corporation/other-person acquisition rights may be separate, consecutive, or simultaneous; corporation/class-or-series-holder/other-person approval and designated-person/class prohibition require no manifest unreasonableness (§ 35-14-627(4))
Ownership cap, automatic transfer, tax, and regulatory routesShareholder-number/identity status and federal/state securities-exemption purposes authorized; no separate ownership cap, mandatory/automatic transfer, tax-attribute, or general regulatory-compliance route stated in § 35-14-627(3)
Reasonableness, manifest unreasonableness, and public policyOther purpose must be reasonable; approval and designated-person/class terms not manifestly unreasonable. § 35-14-732 residual governance/relationship route must not be contrary to public policy (§§ 35-14-627(3)-(4), 35-14-732(1)(h))
Certificate legend, uncertificated notice, and actual knowledgeGeneral: conspicuous certificate or § 35-14-626(2) statement; omission protects person without knowledge. § 35-14-732 agreement: conspicuous certificate or statement notice; uncertificated purchaser may need statement by purchase time. UCC knowledge means actual knowledge (§§ 30-1-210(2), 30-8-214)
Transferee, successor, fiduciary, and stated legal effectGeneral noticed restriction valid/enforceable against shareholder or transferee; missing notice bars enforcement against person without knowledge. § 35-14-732 omission does not invalidate agreement/action, but uninformed purchaser gets rescission, sued on earlier of 90 days after discovery or 2 years after purchase
UCC, securities, public-company, valuation, and fiduciary boundariesCurrent UCC issuer-notice rule is § 30-8-214; § 30-8-204 is repealed. § 35-14-627 may alter/eliminate § 35-14-1434 fair-value purchase election; § 35-14-732(8) places any duration limit in agreement. Valuation, dissolution procedure, securities registration, intermediaries, fiduciary outcomes, and other remedies remain outside scope

Requirements one by one

Authorized records, earlier shares, and the dissolution-purchase election

Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-627(1) permits a restriction in the articles of incorporation, bylaws, an agreement among shareholders, or an agreement between shareholders and the corporation. A share issued before adoption is unaffected unless its holder is a party to the restriction agreement or voted for the restriction.

The same provision expressly allows those records to restrict, alter, or eliminate the application of § 35-14-1434. That separate section ordinarily allows the corporation or shareholders to elect to purchase a petitioning shareholder's shares at fair value in lieu of judicial dissolution. Whether and how to modify that election, and the valuation and dissolution consequences, are outside this survey.

For § 35-14-627, “shares” includes a security convertible into or carrying a right to subscribe for or acquire shares.

Permitted purposes and forms

Section 35-14-627(3) authorizes restrictions used to maintain a corporate status dependent on shareholder number or identity, preserve a federal or state securities-law exemption, or serve another reasonable purpose.

The listed forms are a first offer to the corporation or other people; an obligation for the corporation or other people to acquire the shares; approval by the corporation, holders of a class or series, or other people; and a prohibition involving designated people or classes. The offer and acquisition routes may operate separately, consecutively, or simultaneously. Approval and designated-person terms must not be manifestly unreasonable.

The surveyed provision does not separately prescribe an ownership percentage cap, mandatory or automatic transfer, tax-attribute or general regulatory- compliance route, purchase price, valuation formula, funding method, or remedy.

Corporate and UCC notice rules

An authorized general restriction is valid and enforceable against a shareholder or the shareholder's transferee when its existence is noted conspicuously on the certificate or included in the written information statement for uncertificated shares. Without that notice, § 35-14-627(2) says it is not enforceable against a person without knowledge.

Montana's UCC defines “knowledge” as actual knowledge in § 30-1-210(2). Current § 30-8-214 separately makes an issuer-imposed restriction ineffective against a person without actual knowledge unless a certificated security conspicuously notes the restriction or the registered owner of an uncertificated security was notified. Section 30-8-204 is repealed and is not the current Montana rule.

Unless the articles or bylaws provide otherwise, § 35-14-626 lets the board authorize some or all classes or series without certificates. Existing certificates remain until surrender. Within a reasonable time after an uncertificated issue or transfer, the corporation delivers the shareholder the applicable certificate and restriction information.

Unanimous shareholder-agreement overlay

Section 35-14-732 covers a special shareholder agreement. It must be in the articles or bylaws and approved by all current shareholders, or in a written agreement signed by all current shareholders and made known to the corporation. Amendment ordinarily requires all current shareholders unless the agreement provides otherwise. Any duration limit must be stated in the agreement.

The agreement's existence must be noted conspicuously on each outstanding certificate or on the uncertificated-share information statement. Existing certificates must be recalled and replaced. Missing notice does not invalidate the agreement or an action under it, but a purchaser without knowledge is entitled to rescind. Certificate or statement notice, plus delivery of the statement at or before an uncertificated purchase, establishes the statutory knowledge route. The rescission action is due by the earlier of 90 days after discovery or two years after purchase.

What trips people up

Montana's current UCC numbering is different. The operative issuer- restriction rule is § 30-8-214. Section 30-8-204 is expressly repealed, so a form or agreement citing it is using the wrong current section number.

The restriction may reach a dissolution remedy. Section 35-14-627 does more than authorize transfer limits: it expressly permits alteration or elimination of § 35-14-1434's purchase election. That choice can affect a judicial-dissolution dispute and requires transaction-specific advice.

The general and unanimous-agreement consequences differ. Missing general restriction notice prevents enforcement against a protected person. Missing special-agreement notice does not invalidate the agreement or action under it; it creates a purchaser's time-limited rescission right.

Common questions

May a Montana restriction appear in the bylaws?

Yes. Section 35-14-627(1) expressly names the bylaws. A qualifying section 35-14-732 agreement may also be placed there, but all current shareholders must approve it.

May Montana require the corporation to buy restricted shares?

Yes. Section 35-14-627(4)(b) permits a restriction obligating the corporation or other people, separately, consecutively, or simultaneously, to acquire the shares. It does not set the trigger, price, valuation method, funding, or remedy.

Must the special shareholder agreement state an end date?

No fixed statutory term appears in § 35-14-732. Subsection (8) says any limits on the agreement's duration must be set forth in the agreement.

Can Montana shares be issued without certificates?

Yes, when the articles or bylaws do not provide otherwise. Section 35-14-626 preserves existing certificates until surrender and requires the written information statement after an uncertificated issuance or transfer.

Statutes and sources

  • Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-627(1)-(2) — authorized records, restriction of the dissolution-purchase election, earlier-share assent, certificate or information-statement notice, knowledge, and shareholder/transferee effect. Official Montana Code Annotated text, accessed August 26, 2026.
  • Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-627(3)-(5) — authorized purposes, enumerated forms and sequencing, manifest-unreasonableness limits, and covered convertible or subscription-right securities. Official Montana Code Annotated text, accessed August 26, 2026.
  • Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-626 — board authorization of uncertificated shares, surrender of existing certificates, and the written information statement. Official Montana Code Annotated text, accessed August 26, 2026.
  • Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-732(1)(h), (2)-(3), and (8) — unanimous- agreement form, amendment and duration; certificate and information-statement notice; certificate recall; purchaser rescission; and limitation period. Official Montana Code Annotated text, accessed August 26, 2026.
  • Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-1434(1) — fair-value purchase election that a qualifying restriction may alter, eliminate, or otherwise restrict. Official Montana Code Annotated text, accessed August 26, 2026.
  • Mont. Code Ann. § 30-1-210(2) — UCC actual knowledge. Official Montana Code Annotated text, accessed August 26, 2026.
  • Mont. Code Ann. § 30-8-204 — repealed former Article 8 section. Official Montana Code Annotated text, accessed August 26, 2026.
  • Mont. Code Ann. § 30-8-214 — current UCC effectiveness rule for issuer- imposed restrictions on certificated and uncertificated securities. Official Montana Code Annotated text, accessed August 26, 2026.

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-627(1)-(2) · accessed 2026-08-26
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-627(3)-(5) · accessed 2026-08-26
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-626 · accessed 2026-08-26
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-1434(1) · accessed 2026-08-26
Mont. Code Ann. § 30-1-210(2) · accessed 2026-08-26
Mont. Code Ann. § 30-8-204 · accessed 2026-08-26
Mont. Code Ann. § 30-8-214 · accessed 2026-08-26
This page is general legal information about state-law authorization and notice for restrictions on transferring, registering transfer of, or owning shares of an ordinary domestic private for-profit corporation, not legal, securities, tax, valuation, fiduciary-duty, governance, contract, creditor, drafting, or litigation advice. The corporation's current articles or certificate, bylaws, shareholder and voting agreements, class and series terms, capitalization and ownership records, holder assent, certificates, uncertificated-share notices, actual knowledge, tax and regulatory status, public-company status, and special statutory classification can change whether a restriction is authorized or binds a holder or transferee. A corporate-law legend does not itself satisfy federal or state securities-registration, restricted-securities, tax, UCC Article 8, transfer-agent, licensing, or contractual requirements, and statutory authorization does not establish that a bespoke restriction, price, valuation method, remedy, or fiduciary process is reasonable or enforceable. Nonprofit, professional, benefit, public, foreign, regulated, dissolved, reorganizing, and disputed corporations may use different rules. Statutes, governing documents, ownership records, securities systems, and regulatory requirements change independently. Verified against the cited official sources on the date shown; confirm current law and the complete transaction record and obtain licensed advice before adopting, amending, enforcing, accepting, or buying shares subject to a consequential restriction.

What does Montana law mean for your facts?

You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current Montana law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace