Corporate Director and Shareholder Liability for Unlawful Distributions in South Dakota
At a glance
| Law, transactions, and persons | S.D. Codified Laws §§ 47-1A-833, 47-1A-833.1; voting/assenting directors; ordinary and liquidation distributions (§§ 47-1A-640, 47-1A-1409). |
|---|---|
| Underlying prohibited distribution | Excess over § 47-1A-640 articles/financial limits or § 47-1A-1409 claims-first duty (§ 47-1A-833). |
| Director conduct and defenses | Vote or assent plus claimant's proof of failure to meet §§ 47-1A-830 and -830.1 good-faith, care, corporate-interest, and qualified-reliance standards. |
| Amount, interest, and shared liability | Amount exceeding permissible §§ 47-1A-640 or -1409 distribution, owed to corporation; § 47-1A-833 gives no separate interest or joint-liability formula. |
| Who may enforce | Director personally liable to corporation (§ 47-1A-833); this section names no direct creditor claimant. |
| Recipient shareholder recovery | Liable director may recoup each shareholder's pro-rata unlawful amount knowingly accepted in violation of § 47-1A-640 or -1409 (§ 47-1A-833.1). |
| Contribution and dissent | Contribution from every other director who could be liable (§ 47-1A-833.1); present director may avoid presumed assent through timely objection or recorded/delivered dissent or abstention (§ 47-1A-824.1). |
| Filing periods | Director claim: two years from § 47-1A-640.2/.4 measurement, articles-violation, or liquidation-payment date (§ 47-1A-833); contribution/recoupment: one year after final adjudication (§ 47-1A-833.1). |
| Related remedies and limits of this comparison | § 47-1A-640.5 excludes liquidation from ordinary limits; § 47-1A-1409 gives claims-first duty and barred/satisfied-claim protection. Other remedies and actual liability need separate law and facts. |
Requirements one by one
Director conduct and excess recovery
S.D. Codified Laws § 47-1A-833 makes a director who voted for or assented to a distribution beyond § 47-1A-640 or § 47-1A-1409 liable to the corporation for the excess if the claimant proves the director failed § 47-1A-830 and § 47-1A-830.1 when acting. The two conduct sections require good faith, a reasonable belief in corporate interests, appropriate care, and allow reliance on specified people and financial information when the director lacks knowledge making reliance unwarranted. The rule in § 47-1A-640.1 supplies the ordinary post-distribution financial limits.
Contribution, recoupment, and dissent
S.D. Codified Laws § 47-1A-833.1 allows a liable director to seek contribution from every other director who could be liable and a pro-rata recoupment from a shareholder who accepted the unlawful amount knowing it violated § 47-1A-640 or § 47-1A-1409. Under § 47-1A-824.1, a present director avoids presumed assent by timely objection, recorded dissent or abstention, or written notice before or immediately after adjournment. A director voting in favor cannot dissent.
Separate periods for primary and follow-on claims
The primary claim has two years from the applicable § 47-1A-640.2 or § 47-1A-640.4 measurement event, articles-violation date, or liquidation payment date (§ 47-1A-833). Section 47-1A-640.2 distinguishes share acquisitions, distribution debt, and other payments; for the last category, authorization controls if payment follows within 120 days, otherwise payment controls. Section 47-1A-640.4 measures payments on qualifying conditional distribution debt when actually made. Section 47-1A-833.1 gives contribution and recoupment one year after final adjudication of the claimant director's liability.
What trips people up
The ordinary financial limits in §§ 47-1A-640 to -640.4 do not govern liquidation distributions (§ 47-1A-640.5). Section 47-1A-1409 instead requires payment or reasonable provision for claims before distributing assets to shareholders, and protects directors regarding claims barred or satisfied through its specified claims procedures.
Common questions
Is a recipient liable merely for accepting a payment?
Section 47-1A-833.1 gives a liable director recoupment only from a shareholder who accepted the unlawful amount knowing of the cited violation.
Is every director's presence at the meeting assent?
Section 47-1A-824.1 supplies specific objection and dissent routes that can rebut presumed assent; a favorable vote cannot be reclassified as dissent.
Statutes and sources
- S.D. Codified Laws § 47-1A-140, accessed September 27, 2026: corporation and distribution definitions.
- S.D. Codified Laws §§ 47-1A-640 to -640.5, accessed September 27, 2026: ordinary limits, measurement, and liquidation exclusion; individual section URLs are listed in the quoted statute entries above.
- S.D. Codified Laws § 47-1A-824.1, accessed September 27, 2026: presumed assent and dissent.
- S.D. Codified Laws §§ 47-1A-830 to -830.1, accessed September 27, 2026: director conduct and reliance.
- S.D. Codified Laws §§ 47-1A-833 to -833.1, accessed September 27, 2026: liability, contribution, recoupment, and periods.
- S.D. Codified Laws § 47-1A-1409, accessed September 27, 2026: dissolved-corporation duty.
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.
What does South Dakota law mean for your facts?
You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current South Dakota law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace