Corporate Director and Shareholder Liability for Unlawful Distributions in Arkansas

Short answer An Arkansas director who votes for or assents to a distribution contrary to the Business Corporation Act or the articles may owe the corporation the excess if the director failed the statutory conduct standard. A liable director may seek contribution from other responsible directors and from each shareholder for the amount accepted with knowledge of the violation. The liability section gives no special filing period.
State
Arkansas
Statute checked
September 27, 2026
Sources
6 statutes

At a glance

Law, transactions, and personsArk. Code § 4-27-833 (1987 Act 958 § 64-821); voting or assenting directors; distributions include dividends, share acquisitions and debt (§ 4-27-140(6)).
Underlying prohibited distributionDistribution violates Business Corporation Act or articles (§ 4-27-833(a)); § 4-27-640(a), (c) supplies ordinary board authorization and post-payment limits.
Director conduct and defensesVote or assent without complying with § 4-27-830 director duties (§ 4-27-833(a)); § 4-27-824(d) has recorded dissent/abstention routes.
Amount, interest, and shared liabilityExcess over amount distributable under Act or articles (§ 4-27-833(a)); section states no interest or joint-liability formula.
Who may enforceDirector personally liable to corporation (§ 4-27-833(a)); this section names no direct creditor claimant.
Recipient shareholder recoveryLiable director may seek contribution from each shareholder for amount accepted knowing of Act or articles violation (§ 4-27-833(b)(2)).
Contribution and dissentContribution from other assenting directors failing duty standard; present director deemed to assent absent objection, minute entry, or timely notice (§§ 4-27-833(b)(1), 4-27-824(d)).
Filing periods§ 4-27-833 states no section-specific period or contribution start; applicable limitations require separate review.
Related remedies and limits of this comparison§ 4-27-833 concerns this statutory recovery; whether § 4-27-640 tests are met and any other remedies need separate analysis.

Requirements one by one

Director conduct and the recoverable amount

Ark. Code § 4-27-833(a) makes a director who votes for or assents to an Act- or articles-violating distribution liable to the corporation if the director did not meet the § 4-27-830 standards. The amount is what exceeds the distribution permitted by the Act and articles. Section 4-27-830 requires good faith, ordinary prudent-person care in a like position, and a reasonable belief that the act serves the corporation’s best interests; it also permits qualified reliance on specified corporate personnel, experts, and board committees.

Contribution from directors and recipients

Section 4-27-833(b) lets a director held liable seek contribution from other voting or assenting directors who failed the conduct standard. The same subsection reaches each shareholder only for the amount that shareholder accepted knowing the payment violated the Act or the articles. The statute gives the shareholder recovery right to the liable director, while subsection (a) makes that director liable to the corporation.

What trips people up

Section 4-27-824(d) deems a director present when board or committee action is taken to have assented unless the director objects to the meeting, has dissent or abstention entered in the minutes, or delivers written dissent or abstention to the presiding officer before adjournment or the corporation immediately after. A director who voted for the action cannot use the dissent route.

Common questions

Is an unlawful payment automatically a claim for its full amount?

No. Section 4-27-833(a) measures liability by the amount above what could have been distributed without violating the Act or the articles. Section 4-27-640(c) supplies debt-payment and asset limits for ordinary distributions; the actual figures need separate analysis.

Does § 4-27-833 state a deadline or a creditor claim?

Section 4-27-833 names the corporation as the director’s claimant and gives no filing period in its text. Other law may affect who can sue or when, so this comparison makes no general limitations prediction.

Statutes and sources

  • Ark. Code § 4-27-140, accessed September 27, 2026: enacted as Act 958 § 64-114, defining the corporation and distribution.
  • Ark. Code § 4-27-640, accessed September 27, 2026: enacted as Act 958 § 64-616, giving authorization and distribution limits.
  • Ark. Code § 4-27-824, accessed September 27, 2026: enacted as Act 958 § 64-816, stating meeting-presence assent exceptions.
  • Ark. Code § 4-27-830, accessed September 27, 2026: enacted as Act 958 § 64-818, stating director conduct and reliance standards.
  • Ark. Code § 4-27-833, accessed September 27, 2026: enacted as Act 958 § 64-821, providing excess-payment recovery and contribution.

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

This page gives general legal information about statutory recovery for an unlawful distribution by an ordinary domestic business corporation. It is not legal or financial advice. The corporation's governing documents, financial records, transaction terms, board records, and current statute determine which rules apply. The table does not decide whether a distribution is unlawful or whether any director or shareholder is liable. Separate creditor, fraudulent-transfer, bankruptcy, fiduciary-duty, and tax rules may apply. Confirm current official law and obtain licensed advice for a specific dispute or transaction.

What does Arkansas law mean for your facts?

You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current Arkansas law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace