Corporate Director Removal and Board-Vacancy Requirements in New Hampshire

Short answer New Hampshire shareholders ordinarily may remove a director with or without cause at a purpose-called meeting; votes cast for removal must exceed votes cast against unless cumulative voting is authorized, when election-sufficient opposition protects the director. Shareholders, the board, or a below-quorum majority of all remaining directors may fill a vacancy, and the superior court has a separate misconduct-based removal route.
State
New Hampshire
Statute checked
August 25, 2026
Sources
15 statutes

At a glance

Governing law, entity, director, removal, vacancy, and scopeNew Hampshire Business Corporation Act, RSA ch. 293-A; ordinary domestic private for-profit corporation under special-meeting, voting, shareholder- agreement, term, resignation, removal, and vacancy provisions (RSA §§ 293-A:1.01, :1.40, :7.02, :7.05, :7.25, :7.27-.28, :7.32, :8.05-.10)
Shareholder removal, cause, vote threshold, and governing documentsShareholders may remove one/more with/without cause unless articles make cause-only. Without authorized cumulative voting, votes cast for removal must exceed votes cast against; articles may require a greater vote. Qualifying unanimous shareholder agreement may set removal manner (RSA §§ 293-A:7.25(c), :7.27, :7.32(a)(3), :8.08(a), (c))
Cumulative, class/series, classified, and appointed-director protectionsWith articles-authorized cumulative voting, election-sufficient opposition blocks removal; only the voting group that elected the director participates. Articles may stagger two/three groups, but classification adds no cause rule. No vacancy-appointee exception stated (RSA §§ 293-A:7.28, :8.06, :8.08(b)- (c))
Board, court, automatic, disqualification, and special removal routesNo ordinary board-removal or automatic-disqualification route. In corporation- commenced or corporation-right proceeding, superior court may remove for specified fraud, gross abuse, or intentional harm plus best-interest and inadequate-remedy findings; it may bar reelection and order other relief (RSA § 293-A:8.09)
Meeting, notice, stated purpose, hearing, and effective timeOrdinary removal only at purpose-called meeting whose notice states removal; general notice is 10-60 days. Board, articles/bylaw-authorized caller, or ordinarily 10%-vote demand may trigger. No director statement/hearing or delayed-effective rule; qualifying § 293-A:7.32 agreement may alter manner (RSA §§ 293-A:7.02, :7.05, :7.32, :8.08(d))
Resignation delivery, future effect, withdrawal, and irrevocabilityWritten resignation delivered to board, chair, or secretary; delivery- effective unless later date or event specified. A failed-election-vote- conditioned resignation may be irrevocable; no general withdrawal or acceptance rule stated (RSA § 293-A:8.07)
Vacancy occurrence, definition, and replacement termVacancy provision expressly includes board-size increase and vacancy at a specific later date; prospective filler waits to take office. Every vacancy fill expires at next shareholder meeting where directors are elected; no predecessor-unexpired-term rule (RSA §§ 293-A:8.05(d), :8.10(a), (c))
Shareholder, board, remaining-director, class-group, and all-vacant fillersUnless articles vary: shareholders, board, or below-quorum affirmative majority of all remaining directors. Voting-group shareholders or same-group directors exclusively fill their seat. With no directors, shareholders remain express filler and qualifying holders may demand special meeting (RSA §§ 293-A:7.02, :8.10(a)-(b))
Public proxy, fiduciary, contract, dissolution, and dispute boundariesQualifying shareholder agreement ends when corporation becomes public; public-only vote-against bylaw can create a board-filled vacancy. Federal proxy/exchange, fiduciary and contract consequences, indemnification, contested office, dissolution, deadlock, receivership, and regulated entities remain separate (RSA §§ 293-A:7.32(d)-(f), :8.09, :10.22)

Requirements one by one

RSA § 293-A:1.01 identifies the New Hampshire Business Corporation Act. RSA § 293-A:1.40 limits the ordinary answer to a domestic for-profit corporation and separately defines a public corporation.

Removal is meeting-only and ordinarily does not require cause

RSA § 293-A:8.08(a) permits shareholders to remove one or more directors with or without cause unless the articles make removal cause-only. Only the voting group that elected a director may participate in removing that director.

Without cumulative voting, votes cast to remove must exceed votes cast not to remove. RSA § 293-A:7.25 and RSA § 293-A:7.27 allow the articles to require a greater vote. If cumulative voting is authorized, election-sufficient votes against removal protect the director.

RSA § 293-A:7.28 makes cumulative voting articles-dependent. Classification under RSA § 293-A:8.06 does not itself add a cause rule.

Notice must identify removal

RSA § 293-A:8.08(d) permits removal only at a meeting called for that purpose whose notice states removal. The specific meeting-only rule leaves no ordinary written-consent removal route.

RSA § 293-A:7.02 permits the board or an articles- or bylaw-authorized caller to call a special meeting. Holders of ten percent of votes on the proposed issue also may demand it by default, although the articles may set a lower percentage or one as high as twenty-five percent. RSA § 293-A:7.05 requires ten-to-sixty- day notice and a purpose description for a special meeting.

A qualifying RSA § 293-A:7.32 shareholder agreement is different. If approved or signed by all shareholders as that section requires, it may establish a director's manner of removal even when inconsistent with another chapter provision. The ordinary removal provisions state no director statement or hearing right and no separate delayed-effective rule.

Judicial removal requires conduct, remedy, and best-interest findings

Under RSA § 293-A:8.09, the superior court may remove a director in a proceeding commenced by or in the right of the corporation. The court must find fraudulent conduct toward the corporation or shareholders, gross abuse of the director position, or intentional harm to the corporation. It also must consider the course of conduct and inadequacy of other remedies and find removal in the corporation's best interest.

The court may prescribe a reelection bar and retains equitable power to order other relief. The Act states no ordinary board-removal or automatic- disqualification route.

Resignation may depend on a future event

RSA § 293-A:8.07 requires a written resignation delivered to the board, its chair, or the secretary. It is effective on delivery unless it specifies a later date or an effective date determined by one or more events. A resignation conditioned on failure to receive a specified election vote may state that it is irrevocable. The section states no general acceptance or withdrawal rule.

Shareholders and directors may fill the vacancy

Unless the articles provide otherwise, RSA § 293-A:8.10 authorizes the shareholders or board to fill a vacancy, including a newly created seat. If the remaining directors are below quorum, an affirmative majority of all remaining directors may fill it.

For a voting-group seat, the group holders exclusively act when shareholders fill the seat, and directors elected by that group exclusively act when directors fill it. A vacancy occurring at a specific later date may be filled early, but the successor does not take office until it occurs.

If no directors remain, shareholders are still an express filler, and qualifying holders may demand a special meeting under RSA § 293-A:7.02.

Every vacancy filler receives a next-election term

RSA § 293-A:8.05(d) ends the term of a director elected to fill any vacancy at the next shareholder meeting at which directors are elected. The predecessor's unexpired term is not the default.

What trips people up

New Hampshire's cumulative-voting protection matters only if the articles authorize cumulative voting. Otherwise, removal compares votes cast for and against, subject to any greater articles vote.

A qualifying unanimous shareholder agreement can change the manner of removal, but an ordinary bylaw cannot erase RSA § 293-A:8.08(d)'s meeting-only rule.

RSA § 293-A:10.22 creates a public-corporation-only branch. A qualifying vote- against bylaw ends an elected director's term when the board selects a successor and treats that selection as filling a vacancy under RSA § 293-A:8.10. It does not govern the ordinary private corporation covered here.

Common questions

Can New Hampshire shareholders remove a director without cause?

Ordinarily yes. RSA § 293-A:8.08(a) permits removal with or without cause unless the articles require cause.

Can shareholders remove a director by written consent?

Not under the ordinary rule. RSA § 293-A:8.08(d) says shareholder removal may occur only at a purpose-called meeting. A qualifying unanimous shareholder agreement under RSA § 293-A:7.32 may establish a different manner of removal.

May the remaining directors fill a vacancy when they lack a quorum?

Yes. RSA § 293-A:8.10(a)(3) permits an affirmative majority of all remaining directors to fill it.

How long does the replacement serve?

Under RSA § 293-A:8.05(d), the replacement's term expires at the next shareholder meeting where directors are elected.

Statutes and sources

  • RSA §§ 293-A:1.01 and :1.40. The official text supplies the Act's short title and its domestic for-profit and public-corporation definitions quoted in the source record. Official merged Chapter 293-A (accessed August 25, 2026).
  • RSA §§ 293-A:7.02, :7.05, :7.25, :7.27-.28, and :7.32. The official text supplies the special-meeting demand, notice, ordinary and enhanced vote, cumulative-voting, and qualifying shareholder-agreement rules quoted in the source record. Official merged Chapter 293-A (accessed August 25, 2026).
  • RSA §§ 293-A:8.05-.10. The official text supplies the replacement-term, staggered-term, resignation, shareholder-removal, judicial-removal, and vacancy-filling rules quoted in the source record. Official merged Chapter 293-A (accessed August 25, 2026).
  • RSA § 293-A:10.22. The official text supplies the public-corporation vote- against bylaw branch quoted in the source record. Official merged Chapter 293-A (accessed August 25, 2026).

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

RSA § 293-A:1.01 · accessed 2026-08-25
RSA § 293-A:1.40 · accessed 2026-08-25
RSA § 293-A:7.02 · accessed 2026-08-25
RSA § 293-A:7.05 · accessed 2026-08-25
RSA § 293-A:7.25 · accessed 2026-08-25
RSA § 293-A:7.27 · accessed 2026-08-25
RSA § 293-A:7.28 · accessed 2026-08-25
RSA § 293-A:7.32 · accessed 2026-08-25
RSA § 293-A:8.05 · accessed 2026-08-25
RSA § 293-A:8.06 · accessed 2026-08-25
RSA § 293-A:8.07 · accessed 2026-08-25
RSA § 293-A:8.08 · accessed 2026-08-25
RSA § 293-A:8.09 · accessed 2026-08-25
RSA § 293-A:8.10 · accessed 2026-08-25
RSA § 293-A:10.22 · accessed 2026-08-25
This page is general legal information about state-law director resignation, removal, vacancy, and replacement procedure for an ordinary domestic private for-profit corporation, not legal, governance, securities, fiduciary-duty, employment, compensation, tax, capitalization, drafting, or litigation advice. The corporation's current articles or certificate, bylaws, shareholder and voting agreements, class and series rights, capitalization and voting records, board classification, appointment rights, public-company status, notices, contracts, and special statutory classification can change who may remove or replace a director, what cause or vote applies, and when office ends or a successor takes office. Procedural authority does not establish cause, cure a fiduciary or contract breach, resolve a control or ownership dispute, or satisfy federal proxy, securities, exchange, lender, licensing, or regulatory duties. Nonprofit, professional, benefit, public, foreign, regulated, dissolved, insolvent, reorganizing, and disputed corporations may use different rules. Statutes, governing documents, class rights, contracts, and public-company requirements change independently. Verified against the cited official sources on the date shown; confirm the current law and corporate records and obtain licensed advice for contested cause, removal, resignation, vacancy, control, appointment, court relief, or other consequential board change.

What does New Hampshire law mean for your facts?

You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current New Hampshire law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace