Corporate Director Removal and Board-Vacancy Requirements in Montana

Short answer Montana shareholders ordinarily may remove a director with or without cause when votes cast for removal exceed votes cast against, subject to greater articles or bylaw requirements and cumulative-voting protection. The Act says removal is meeting-only but also expressly addresses less-than-unanimous removal consent, creating a statutory tension that corporate records and licensed advice should resolve before relying on consent.
State
Montana
Statute checked
August 25, 2026
Sources
16 statutes

At a glance

Governing law, entity, director, removal, vacancy, and scopeMontana Business Corporation Act, Mont. Code Ann. §§ 35-14-101, -140; ordinary domestic private for-profit corporation under meeting/consent, shareholder-agreement, office-review, term, resignation, removal, vacancy, and vote-against-bylaw provisions (§§ 35-14-702, -704-.705, -728, -732, -749, -805 to -810, -1022)
Shareholder removal, cause, vote threshold, and governing documentsShareholders may remove one/more with/without cause unless articles make cause-only. Votes cast for must exceed votes cast against, except articles/ bylaws may require greater number. Qualifying unanimous shareholder agreement may set removal manner (§§ 35-14-732(1)(c), (2), -808(1), (3))
Cumulative, class/series, classified, and appointed-director protectionsWith articles-authorized cumulative voting, election-sufficient opposition blocks removal at meeting; equivalent holders must withhold consent in less- than-unanimous consent attempt. Only electing voting group participates. Staggering adds no cause rule; no vacancy-appointee exception (§§ 35-14-728, -806, -808(2)-(3))
Board, court, automatic, disqualification, and special removal routesNo ordinary board-removal/disqualification route. Corporation/right-of- corporation proceeding permits district-court misconduct removal, other relief, and reelection bar. Separate expedited § 35-14-749 office review; qualifying vote-against bylaw ends term within 90 days or on board-selected replacement (§§ 35-14-749, -809, -1022)
Meeting, notice, stated purpose, hearing, and effective timeSection 35-14-808(4) says removal only at purpose-called meeting with stated notice, while subsection (3) expressly addresses less-than-unanimous removal consent under general consent route. Meeting notice is 10-60 days; ordinary 10%-vote demand. No director hearing right stated (§§ 35-14-702, -704-.705, -808(3)-(4))
Resignation delivery, future effect, withdrawal, and irrevocabilityWritten resignation to board, chair, or secretary; general notice rules set effectiveness unless delayed, including future event(s). Failed-election- vote-conditioned resignation may be irrevocable; no general withdrawal or acceptance rule stated (§§ 35-14-141(9), -807)
Vacancy occurrence, definition, and replacement termVacancy expressly includes board-size increase and specific later date; prospective filler waits. Default fill expires next director-election meeting, but bylaws may give predecessor's unexpired term. Vote-against bylaw treats board selection as vacancy fill (§§ 35-14-805(4), -810, -1022(1)(b))
Shareholder, board, remaining-director, class-group, and all-vacant fillersUnless articles vary: shareholders, board, or below-quorum affirmative majority of all remaining directors. Voting-group shareholders or remaining same-group directors exclusively fill their seat. With no directors, shareholders remain express filler and qualifying holders may demand special meeting (§§ 35-14-702, -810(1)-(2))
Public proxy, fiduciary, contract, dissolution, and dispute boundariesVote-against bylaw unavailable when articles prohibit, alter election vote, or authorize cumulation and has contested-election exception. Federal proxy/ exchange, fiduciary and contract consequences, indemnification, contested- office merits beyond § 35-14-749, dissolution, receivership, and regulated entities remain separate (§§ 35-14-749, -809, -1022)

Requirements one by one

Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-101 identifies the Montana Business Corporation Act. Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-140 limits the ordinary answer to a domestic for-profit corporation.

Removal ordinarily uses a votes-cast comparison

Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-808(1) permits shareholders to remove one or more directors with or without cause unless the articles make removal cause-only. Only the voting group that elected a director may participate in removing that director.

Ordinarily, votes cast to remove must exceed votes cast not to remove. The articles or bylaws may require a greater number. If cumulative voting is authorized, election-sufficient opposition protects the director. Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-728 makes cumulative voting articles-dependent, and classification under Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-806 does not itself add a cause rule.

A qualifying Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-732 shareholder agreement may establish a different manner of director removal if approved or signed by all shareholders as that section requires.

The removal section conflicts with itself on consent

Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-808(4) says a shareholder may remove a director only at a meeting called for removal and whose notice states removal. Subsection (3), however, expressly protects a cumulative-voting director when action is taken by less-than-unanimous written consent unless holders of election-sufficient votes consent.

Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-704 supplies a general unanimous-consent route and lets the articles authorize meeting-equivalent nonunanimous consent. The specific removal text therefore points in both directions. This page preserves the conflict; it does not assume that subsection (3) overrides subsection (4) or the reverse.

For a meeting, Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-702 permits the board or an articles- or bylaw-authorized caller to call a special meeting. Holders of ten percent of votes on the proposed issue also may demand it by default, although the articles may set a lower percentage or one as high as twenty-five percent. Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-705 requires ten-to-sixty-day notice. The removal provisions state no director statement or hearing right and no separate delayed-effective rule.

Montana separates misconduct removal from office review

Under Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-809, the district court may remove a director or order other relief in a proceeding commenced by or in the right of the corporation. It must find fraudulent conduct toward the corporation or shareholders, gross abuse of the director position, or intentional harm to the corporation. Considering the course of conduct and inadequacy of other remedies, it also must find removal or other relief in the corporation's best interests. The court may bar reelection.

Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-749 provides a separate expedited proceeding to determine removal or resignation validity and the right to office. It can grant injunctive and other equitable relief. The Act states no ordinary board-removal or automatic-disqualification route.

Resignation timing follows the general notice rules

Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-807 requires written notice to the board, its chair, or the secretary. Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-141(9) supplies the applicable notice- effectiveness rules unless the resignation delays effectiveness, including by one or more future events. A resignation conditioned on failure to receive a specified election vote may state that it is irrevocable. The section states no general acceptance or withdrawal rule.

Shareholders and directors may fill the vacancy

Unless the articles provide otherwise, Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-810 authorizes the shareholders or board to fill a vacancy, including a newly created seat. If the remaining directors are below quorum, an affirmative majority of all remaining directors may fill it.

For a voting-group seat, the group holders exclusively act when shareholders fill the seat, and the remaining directors elected by that group exclusively act when directors fill it, even below quorum. A vacancy occurring at a specific later date may be filled early, but the successor does not take office until it occurs. If no directors remain, shareholders are still an express filler, and qualifying holders may demand a special meeting under § 35-14-702.

Bylaws can choose between two replacement terms

Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-805(4) ordinarily ends a vacancy replacement's term at the next shareholder meeting where directors are elected. The bylaws may instead give the replacement the predecessor's unexpired term.

Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-1022 supplies another private-company branch. When its conditions and noncontested-election limit are satisfied, a for-or-against bylaw ends an elected nominee's term at the earlier of board selection of a replacement or ninety days after vote results are determined. Board selection is treated as a vacancy fill under § 35-14-810.

What trips people up

The meeting-versus-consent conflict is in the same section. Corporate counsel should not infer a clean consent route merely from the general consent statute or ignore subsection (3)'s express consent language merely because subsection (4) says meeting-only.

Bylaws can affect three different points: they may require a greater removal vote, select an unexpired-term replacement, or adopt the qualifying vote-against system. Those are distinct choices with distinct statutory limits.

Common questions

Can Montana shareholders remove a director without cause?

Ordinarily yes. Section 35-14-808 permits removal with or without cause unless the articles require cause.

Can removal occur by written consent?

The statute conflicts. Section 35-14-808(4) says removal is only at a meeting, while subsection (3) expressly addresses less-than-unanimous removal consent. That conflict should be resolved for the particular corporation before relying on consent.

May the remaining directors fill a vacancy without a quorum?

Yes, unless the articles provide otherwise. Section 35-14-810 permits an affirmative majority of all remaining directors to fill it.

How long does a replacement serve?

The default is until the next shareholder meeting where directors are elected, but section 35-14-805 allows the bylaws to give the predecessor's unexpired term.

Statutes and sources

  • Mont. Code Ann. §§ 35-14-101, -140 to -141. The official text supplies the Act name, domestic-corporation definition, and notice-effectiveness rules quoted in the source record. Official MCA 2025 (accessed August 25, 2026).
  • Mont. Code Ann. §§ 35-14-702, -704 to -705, -728, -732, and -749. The official text supplies meeting, consent, cumulative-voting, shareholder- agreement, and office-review rules quoted in the source record. Official MCA 2025 (accessed August 25, 2026).
  • Mont. Code Ann. §§ 35-14-805 to -810. The official text supplies the term, resignation, removal, and vacancy rules quoted in the source record. Official MCA 2025 (accessed August 25, 2026).
  • Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-1022. The official text supplies the qualifying vote-against bylaw and board-filled-vacancy route quoted in the source record. Official MCA 2025 (accessed August 25, 2026).

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-101 · accessed 2026-08-25
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-140 · accessed 2026-08-25
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-141 · accessed 2026-08-25
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-702 · accessed 2026-08-25
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-704 · accessed 2026-08-25
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-705 · accessed 2026-08-25
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-728 · accessed 2026-08-25
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-732 · accessed 2026-08-25
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-749 · accessed 2026-08-25
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-805 · accessed 2026-08-25
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-806 · accessed 2026-08-25
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-807 · accessed 2026-08-25
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-808 · accessed 2026-08-25
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-809 · accessed 2026-08-25
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-810 · accessed 2026-08-25
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-14-1022 · accessed 2026-08-25
This page is general legal information about state-law director resignation, removal, vacancy, and replacement procedure for an ordinary domestic private for-profit corporation, not legal, governance, securities, fiduciary-duty, employment, compensation, tax, capitalization, drafting, or litigation advice. The corporation's current articles or certificate, bylaws, shareholder and voting agreements, class and series rights, capitalization and voting records, board classification, appointment rights, public-company status, notices, contracts, and special statutory classification can change who may remove or replace a director, what cause or vote applies, and when office ends or a successor takes office. Procedural authority does not establish cause, cure a fiduciary or contract breach, resolve a control or ownership dispute, or satisfy federal proxy, securities, exchange, lender, licensing, or regulatory duties. Nonprofit, professional, benefit, public, foreign, regulated, dissolved, insolvent, reorganizing, and disputed corporations may use different rules. Statutes, governing documents, class rights, contracts, and public-company requirements change independently. Verified against the cited official sources on the date shown; confirm the current law and corporate records and obtain licensed advice for contested cause, removal, resignation, vacancy, control, appointment, court relief, or other consequential board change.

What does Montana law mean for your facts?

You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current Montana law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace