Arkansas: Call and Conversation Recording Consent Requirements

verified against the statute 2026-07-20 7 statute sources

The short answer

Arkansas is a one-party consent state for covered calls and conversations. You may record when you are a participant; a nonparticipant needs one party's prior consent. An unlawful interception, recording, or possession of the recording is a Class A misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail and a $2,500 fine, but the statute creates no express civil-damages action and does not itself make an unlawful recording inadmissible.

Ask Ezel about your situation

This is the general rule in Arkansas. Ezel applies current Arkansas law to your specific facts and answers with citations to the statutes.

Governing law and covered recordingArk. Code § 5-60-120: intercepting a wire, landline, oral, telephonic, or wireless communication and recording or possessing the recording; party status or one party's prior consent is the safe harbor.
Whose consent a participant needsOne-party consent. A participant may record; a nonparticipant may intercept and record with one party's prior consent (Ark. Code § 5-60-120(a)).
Privacy, confidentiality, or secrecy triggerNo express privacy, confidentiality, secrecy, or reasonable-expectation qualifier in § 5-60-120(a); the text turns on the covered communication and party/consent status. No public-place exclusion is stated.
Telephone, in-person, and electronic coverageExpressly covers wire, landline, oral, telephonic, and wireless communications, including the cellular/cordless expansion enacted in 2001. The section does not separately define texts, email, stored data, or a general 'electronic communication' category.
How consent or notice is givenA participant needs no notice or additional consent. For a nonparticipant, one party must give prior consent; no written form, script, audible tone, or continued-participation rule is prescribed (§ 5-60-120(a)).
Major participant-facing exceptionsActs under color of law; utility/telecommunications assistance and ordinary-course provider operations; telecommunications services; FCC-licensed amateur radio; police-scanner interception for pleasure; and specified court orders for stored records, pen registers, and trap-and-trace devices (§ 5-60-120(c)-(g)).
Criminal classification and penaltyClass A misdemeanor: up to 1 year in jail and a possible fine up to $2,500 (Ark. Code §§ 5-60-120(b), 5-4-401(b)(1), 5-4-201(b)(1)).
Civil remedy and evidence effect§ 5-60-120 creates no express private cause of action or statutory damages. The Arkansas Supreme Court held in King v. State that the section does not itself make an unlawful private recording inadmissible; other federal or evidentiary rules may still matter.
Interstate and federal boundaryArkansas states no special interstate or recorder-location rule in § 5-60-120. Federal law likewise generally allows a participant or one party's prior consent unless the purpose is criminal or tortious (18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d)); a stricter connected state's law may still apply, so all-party consent is the prudent baseline.

Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →

Requirements one by one

Governing law and covered recording

Arkansas Code § 5-60-120 covers interception of a wire, landline, oral, telephonic, or wireless communication and the recording or possession of the recording. That last word matters: the section can reach someone who keeps an unlawfully made recording, not only the person who pressed the record button.

Whose consent a participant needs

Arkansas uses a one-party rule. Section 5-60-120(a) makes the conduct unlawful unless the recorder "is a party to the communication" or one party has given prior consent. If you are participating, your party status supplies the statutory safe harbor. If you are not participating, permission from one actual participant is required before the interception and recording.

Privacy, confidentiality, or secrecy trigger

The statute does not add a confidentiality or reasonable-expectation test. It names the covered communication types and then asks whether the recorder was a party or had one party's prior consent. It also states no public-gathering or open-proceeding exclusion. Other privacy, trespass, harassment, or workplace rules may still apply, but § 5-60-120 itself is not written around a separate privacy expectation.

Telephone, in-person, and electronic coverage

The current codified list is broad: wire, landline, oral, telephonic, and wireless communications. The official 2001 enactment expressly described cordless and cellular telephone technologies when it added the landline and wireless language. "Oral" reaches an in-person audio conversation; telephonic and wireless cover the ordinary call question.

The section does not separately define a general "electronic communication" category for texts, email, stored data, or images. Those media should not be treated as controlled by this audio answer merely because a phone or computer carried them.

How consent or notice is given

A participant need not announce the recording or obtain an additional person's permission under § 5-60-120(a). A nonparticipant needs one party's "prior consent." Arkansas prescribes no written form, script, audible tone, or rule that continued participation after a warning automatically proves consent.

Major participant-facing exceptions

The ordinary-person safe harbor is participation or one participant's prior consent. The remaining statutory exceptions mainly concern government and communications systems: acts under color of law; utility or telecommunications-provider assistance and ordinary-course operations; telecommunications services; FCC-licensed amateur radio; police-scanner interception for pleasure; and specified court orders for stored records, pen registers, and trap-and-trace devices (§ 5-60-120(c)-(g)).

Criminal classification and penalty

Section 5-60-120(b) classifies a violation as a Class A misdemeanor. Arkansas Code § 5-4-401(b)(1) caps the jail sentence at one year, and § 5-4-201(b)(1) permits a fine up to $2,500.

Civil remedy and evidence effect

Section 5-60-120 states a criminal classification but creates no express private damages action, liquidated-damages formula, attorney-fee award, or injunction. A person may have a different common-law or statutory claim on particular facts, but it would not arise from an express remedy in this section.

The criminal prohibition is also not an automatic state-law exclusion rule. In King v. State, the Arkansas Supreme Court held that although § 5-60-120 made a private third party's recording unlawful, the section "does not proscribe the admissibility of an unlawful recording." Federal interception law and ordinary evidence rules can present separate questions.

Interstate and federal boundary

Section 5-60-120 gives no special rule for an interstate call or the location of the recorder or device. Federal law generally permits a private participant, or a person with one party's prior consent, to record unless the purpose is to commit a criminal or tortious act (18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d)). Arkansas and federal law therefore share a one-party baseline, but that does not resolve whether a stricter connected state's rule applies. Consent from everyone is the prudent course when jurisdictions differ.

What trips people up

Possessing the recording is part of the Arkansas offense text. If a nonparticipant secretly records two other people without either person's prior consent, handing the file to someone else does not erase the problem; § 5-60-120(a) also names possession of the recording.

One-party consent requires a real party. Leaving a phone in a room after you walk away does not make you a participant in the later conversation. Without one remaining participant's prior consent, the statutory safe harbor is missing.

Illegality and admissibility are separate questions. King says § 5-60-120 itself does not exclude an unlawful recording. That does not make the recording lawful or guarantee that another exclusion rule will not apply.

Common questions

May I record my own Arkansas phone call without telling the other person? Yes under § 5-60-120(a), because you are a party. A different state's law may matter on an interstate call.

May a friend record my call for me? Yes if you give the friend prior consent before the interception and recording. Your friend does not need to become a speaker, but one actual party must authorize the recording.

Does Arkansas's rule cover an in-person meeting? Yes. The statute expressly includes an "oral" communication, and a participant may record under the same party-status safe harbor.

Statutes and sources

  • Ark. Code § 5-60-120(a)-(e) — one-party rule, covered media, misdemeanor classification, and exceptions, as enacted by 2001 Act 1823. https://arkleg.state.ar.us/Home/FTPDocument?path=%2FACTS%2F2001%2FPublic%2FACT1823.pdf (accessed 2026-07-20)
  • Ark. Code § 5-60-120(f)-(g) — stored-record and pen-register court-order provisions, added by 2003 Act 1087. https://arkleg.state.ar.us/Home/FTPDocument?path=%2FACTS%2F2003%2FPublic%2FACT1087.pdf (accessed 2026-07-20)
  • Ark. Code § 5-4-401(b)(1) — one-year Class A misdemeanor ceiling. https://unicourt.github.io/cic-code-ar/transforms/ar/ocar/r78/gov.ar.code.title.05.html#t05c04s5-4-401 (accessed 2026-07-20)
  • Ark. Code § 5-4-201(b)(1) — $2,500 Class A misdemeanor fine ceiling, as amended by 2009 Act 209. https://arkleg.state.ar.us/Home/FTPDocument?path=%2FACTS%2F2009%2FPublic%2FACT209.pdf (accessed 2026-07-20)
  • King v. State, 2019 Ark. 114, 571 S.W.3d 476 — § 5-60-120 does not itself exclude an unlawful recording. https://www.arcourts.gov/sites/default/files/2019-06/Appellate-Update-April-2019.pdf (accessed 2026-07-20)
  • 18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d) — federal private-participant consent rule. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section2511&num=0&edition=prelim (accessed 2026-07-20)

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

Ark. Code § 5-4-401(b)(1) · accessed 2026-07-20
Ark. Code § 5-4-201(b)(1) · accessed 2026-07-20
18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d) · accessed 2026-07-20
This page is general legal information about state call and conversation recording law, not legal advice or permission to record a particular person. The result can depend on who is participating, where each person and the recording device are located, the communication medium, whether the setting is private or confidential, how notice or consent was given, and why the recording is made or used. Interstate choice of law is fact-specific, and a stricter state rule may apply even when federal law or another state would permit one-participant consent. Separate rules govern nonparticipant interception, law enforcement, public meetings, hidden-camera images, workplaces, health and financial information, customer-service calls, and later disclosure. Criminal charges, civil damages, and exclusion of evidence may be possible. Verified against the official statute text on the date shown; obtain consent from every participant when potentially applicable rules differ, and consult a licensed attorney before recording or using a recording in a disputed or interstate matter.

Get the answer for your situation

You just read how Arkansas handles this in general. Ezel applies current Arkansas law to your facts and answers your specific question, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.