Back to Federal guidance

Milwaukee firefighter death benefits as governmental

Summary EBSA said the Milwaukee Firemen Relief Association death-benefit program was a governmental plan excluded from ERISA Title I because state and city law authorized it, coverage was limited to public employees, and the city continued direct subsidies. The opinion concerns that program.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
Advisory Opinion 1986-06A
Date issued
February 3, 1986
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-24.
Status last verified October 24, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-24. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

U.S. Department of Labor Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration Advisory Opinion 1986-06A February 3, 1986

[Recipient address omitted]

Dear Mr. Jacobson:

This is in reply to your letter of February 13, 1984, requesting an advisory opinion regarding coverage under title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). Specifically, you ask whether a benefit program provided by the Firemen Relief Association of the City of Milwaukee (the Association) is a governmental plan within the meaning of section 3(32) of title I of ERISA and therefore is exempt from coverage under that title pursuant to section 4(b)(1) of title I of ERISA.

You advise that section 20.18 of the Charter of the City of Milwaukee created the Association in 1885 and provides for direct annual subsidy of the Association by the City of Milwaukee. The Association operates pursuant to State statute authorizing formation of a relief association in any city by members of its paid fire department (Wis. Stat. §213.10). The Association's sole purpose is to provide a benefit upon the death of a member. Membership is voluntary but limited to current and former employees of the fire department of the City of Milwaukee. The officers of the Association must be active members of the Association and are elected by the membership. The Association's sources of income also include member dues, initiation fees, and investments. In the last completed fiscal year, the direct subsidy accounted for $52,006 of the total revenues of $206,369 of the Association. Death benefits are set by the officers.

Section 3(32) defines the term “governmental plan” to include, in pertinent part, “... a plan established or maintained for its employees by the Government of the United States, by the government of any State or political subdivision thereof, or by any agency or instrumentality of any of the foregoing ....” Because the Association is authorized by State statute and the municipal charter, has only public employees as members, and, as authorized by charter, there is continuing direct subsidy by the City of Milwaukee, the Association's program of benefits constitutes a governmental plan within the meaning of section 3(32) of ERISA. Accordingly, the Association's death benefit program would be exempt from coverage under title I of ERISA as a governmental plan pursuant to section 4(b)(1) of ERISA. This letter constitutes an advisory opinion under ERISA Procedure 76-1. Accordingly, this letter is issued subject to the provisions of the procedure, including section 10 thereof relating to the effect of advisory opinions.

Sincerely,

Elliot I. Daniel Assistant Administrator for Regulations and Interpretations

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace