Back to Federal guidance

Raleigh city medical trust as governmental plan

Summary EBSA said Raleigh’s employee medical plan and trust were a governmental plan excluded from ERISA Title I so long as coverage and funding remained limited to city workers, retirees, dependents and the city as described. It did not decide the trust’s tax status. The opinion concerns that arrangement.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
Advisory Opinion 1985-13A
Date issued
March 26, 1985
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-24.
Status last verified October 24, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-24. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

U.S. Department of Labor Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration Advisory Opinion 1985-13A March 26, 1985

[Recipient address omitted]

Dear Mr. Hill:

This is in reply to your letter of June 7, 1984, requesting an advisory opinion concerning whether requirements of title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) are applicable to the Medical Benefit Trust (the Trust) established by the City of Raleigh, North Carolina, to implement its Medical Benefits Plan (the Plan) for its employees. Specifically, you request an advisory opinion stating the governmental plan exclusion in section 4(b)(1) of title I of ERISA precludes the applicability of reporting and disclosure requirements and other requirements of title I of ERISA.

Your correspondence contains the following facts and representations. The City of Raleigh unilaterally established the Plan some years ago. The Plan is administered by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina (Blue Cross and Blue Shield) on a cost plus administrative fee basis to provide standard hospitalization benefits to individuals currently employed by the City of Raleigh, to individuals retired from employment with the City of Raleigh, and to their eligible dependents.

The City of Raleigh established the Trust by unilateral act of its City Council to be effective August 1, 1982. The Internal Revenue Service issued a determination letter to the Trust dated February 2, 1984, stating the Trust met the requirements forexemption from Federal income tax as a trust described in Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(9). The Trust is used as a conduit for funds paid to Blue Cross and Blue Shield to cover benefits provided under the Plan. With the exception of funds contributed to the Trust by individuals who are or have been employed by the City of Raleigh solely to cover the cost of benefits for their eligible dependents, the City of Raleigh is the sole source of funds for the Trust. Trust funds are held in a trust account with Northwestern Bank. The City of Raleigh is ultimately responsible for all hospitalization benefits promised employees under the Plan, and payment of benefits promised by the Plan is not limited to assets in the Trust. ERISA section 4(b)(1) excludes governmental plans from coverage. ERISA section 3(32), in pertinent part, defines the term governmental plan as "... a plan established or maintained for its employees ... by the government of any State or political subdivision thereof ...." Based on the factual situation you describe, there is sufficient reason to conclude the City of Raleigh has established and maintained a governmental plan for its employees. Accordingly, insofar as the Plan and Trust cover only individuals currently or formerly employed by the City of Raleigh and their dependents and insofar as funding for the Plan and Trust is derived solely from the City of Raleigh and from individuals currently or formerly employed by the City of Raleigh and covered by the Plan, the Department views the arrangement you describe as a governmental plan excluded from title I of ERISA. 1

This letter constitutes an advisory opinion under ERISA Procedure 76-1. Accordingly, this letter is issued subject to the provisions of the procedure, including section 10 thereof relating to the effect of advisory opinions.

Sincerely,

Elliot I. Daniel Acting Assistant Administrator for Regulations and Interpretations

Footnotes

  1. It should be noted that this conclusion is solely for the purposes of title I of ERISA and is not intended to affect the status of the Trust under section 501(c)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code relating to voluntary employees' beneficiary associations.

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace