Students in a disabilities vocational-training placement are not covered employees
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ezel answers your specific situation, under current Massachusetts labor law, with citations.
Minimum Wage Opinion Letter 02-10-03 - Applicability of M.G.L. c. 151 to Vocational Program
February 10, 2003
I am writing in response to your request for this Office's written opinion regarding the applicability of M.G.L. c.
151, the Massachusetts Minimum Fair Wage Law, to the Community Based Vocational Training Program (the
"Program") at *** High School. Specifically, you would like to know if students participating in the Program
are considered employees subject to M.G.L. c. 151, the Massachusetts Minimum Fair Wage Law. [1]
The Massachusetts Minimum Fair Wage Law applies to persons employed in an "occupation" as defined in
M.G.L. c. 151, s. 2. Section 2 defines an "occupation" to be "an industry trade or business or branch thereof or
class of work therein . . . but shall not include . . . work by persons being . . . trained under . . . training
programs in charitable, educational or religious institutions" (emphasis added). The term "training program" is
not defined in the statute. In the absence of statutory guidance, it is left to this Office to give the term a
reasonable interpretation. As this Office has done in other cases, we look to federal wage and hour law for
guidance. Therefore, to determine whether a program in a charitable, educational, or religious organization is a
"training program" within the meaning of the statute, DOS employs factors used by the U.S. Department of
Labor to determine whether an employee is a "trainee" and therefore not an "employee" covered by the Fair
Labor Standards Act (FLSA). See e.g. U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Opinion Letter, January 30,
2001. See also DOS Minimum Wage Opinion Letter, May 9, 2002. These criteria include whether the training:
- is similar to that which would be given in a vocational school,
- is for the benefit of the trainees,
- does not displace regular employees, and trainees work under close supervision,
- provides the employer with no immediate advantage from the activities of the trainees, and on occasion
his/her operations may actually be impeded - does not necessary lead to a job to which the trainee is entitled, and
- is based on a mutual understanding between the employer and trainee that the trainee is not entitled to
wages for the time spent in training.
No single criterion is dispositive; DOS will look to the totality of the circumstances to evaluate a particular
training program. [2] In addition, for training programs in educational institutions, DOS will consider such
factors as whether the training is an integral part of the educational curriculum and whether the student receives
academic credit for participation in the program. See DOS Minimum Wage Opinion Letter, November 19,
2001.
As I understand it, the Program enrolls six students with developmental disabilities including Down Syndrome,
Cerebral Palsy, and Williams Syndrome. The students are placed at vocational training sites such as , ,
*** and other local establishments for two days a week, up to four hours a day, for a maximum of 40 hours at
any given activity. The students do not displace existing employees. The students are accompanied at all times
by a job coach who supervises a student's activities and acts as the student's mentor. The stated purpose of the
Program is to help students obtain skills needed for the workplace and to learn the expectations of a scheduled
work environment. Participation in the Program is part of each student's Individual Education Plan (I.E.P.) and
each student receives 2.5 to 5 academic credits, depending on the time spent in the Program. The school,
employers, and students understand that no wages will be paid and there is no expectation of paid employment
at the end of the training period.
Based on the information provided, it would appear that the Program qualifies as a training program within the
meaning of the statute. Therefore, Program participants are not in "occupations" covered by M.G.L. c. 151, the
Massachusetts Minimum Fair Wage Law. [3] Please note that this opinion is based solely on the information
provided with your request. The existence of other facts not contained in your request might require a different
conclusion.
Page 2
I hope this information has been helpful. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Lisa C. Price
Legal Counsel
Footnotes:
- Please note that employers are also subject to the federal minimum wage and hour law, found in the Fair
Labor Standards Act (FLSA), and regulations promulgated thereunder. For information about applicable federal
wage and hour laws, you should contact the U.S. Department of Labor. The telephone number for the Boston
Office is (617) 624-6700. - The U.S Department of Labor has also published more detailed guidelines as to what constitutes an
"employment relationship" under the Fair Labor Standards Act for students and workers enrolled in
individualized community-based rehabilitation programs. These guidelines are available at the U.S. Department
of Labor website: http://www.dol.gov/whd/flsa/. - You may wish to contact the Office of the Attorney General about the applicability of the Massachusetts
child labor laws, and the Massachusetts Department of Education and the Department of Public Health
regarding any applicable regulations, particularly in regards to supervision of the students' use of kitchen
equipment.
***= Names have been omitted
Get the answer for your situation
You just read Massachusetts's guidance on this. Ezel checks current Massachusetts labor law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.