Sidney Lee Christie

United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia district Deceased · served 1964–1974 Appointed by Lyndon B. Johnson (Democratic) 27 signed orders read

Judge Christie no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Christie decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Christie granted judgment to a Social Security claimant where the record established disability strongly enough to overcome the agency's contrary decision.

“his motion for summary judgment must be granted and defendant’s like motion must be denied.”

Procedural preferences

Christie denied summary judgment when the record still left a material factual dispute for later resolution.

“at least at this stage in the proceedings, a dispute of fact exists with respect to that question.”

Christie remanded a removed maritime dispute when the saving-to-suitors framework left the state court able to hear the claim.

“plaintiff’s motion to remand must be granted and it will be so ordered.”

Cautions

Where the same dispute was already pending in state court, Christie declined to exercise concurrent federal jurisdiction even though the defendant's jurisdictional theory was technically mistaken.

“we simply decline to accept jurisdiction on the well-established theory of absention”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

First Nat. Bank of West Hamlin v. Maryland Cas. Co.
· 1973-01-30
Summary judgment (bank plaintiff) Granted in part

“the plaintiff shall have partial summary judgment against the defendant for its losses resulting from the false certification of Purvis concerning automobiles financed by plaintiff for Hamlin Motor Company”

Burwell v. Virginia Acme Markets, Inc.
· 1973-03-14
Summary judgment (grocery-store defendant) Denied

“The defendant’s motion for summary judgment accordingly must be denied.”

Dagger v. U. S. N. S. Sands
· 1968-02-16
Motions to dismiss (vessel-construction respondents) Denied

“Respondents’ motion to dismiss will accordingly be denied.”

O. F. Shearer & Sons, Inc. v. Decker
· 1972-10-31
Motions to remand (marine-supply plaintiff) Granted

“plaintiff’s motion to remand must be granted and it will be so ordered.”

Marcum v. United States
· 1972-11-22
Motion to vacate sentence (federal prisoner) Granted

“petitioner’s Section 2255 motion to set aside his conviction is granted”

West Virginia State Bar v. Bostic
· 1972-06-14

The court found no federal statutory ground to retain a state bar-enforcement action removed from state court.

Fraley ex rel. Fraley v. Ramey
· 1965-04-01

The court concluded that a justice of the peace enjoyed judicial immunity for issuing a warrant within her jurisdiction.

Adkins v. Celebrezze
· 1965-09-29
Summary judgment (Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare) Granted

“defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted and plaintiff’s complaint hereby dismissed.”

Blue v. Mathena
· 1966-10-26
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Moot / procedural

“In essence, therefore, we simply decline to accept jurisdiction on the well-established theory of absention”

Stewart v. Gardner
· 1966-07-18
Summary judgment (Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare) Granted

“his Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and plaintiff’s Complaint dismissed.”

Slaughter v. Gardner
· 1968-09-16
Summary judgment (Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare) Granted

“the defendant’s motion for summary judgment must be granted.”

Stollings v. Princess Coals, Inc.
· 1969-03-25
Motions to dismiss (coal-company defendants) Denied

“Having found the requisite jurisdictional amount present, defendants’ motion to dismiss must be denied.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No electronic docket sample was available for a historical caseload description.

A historical record

Judge Christie no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.