John Preston Bailey
How Judge Bailey rules, drawn from 22 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
How Judge Bailey decides
Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
What persuades
On a timeliness argument for removal, the judge treated the statutory 30-day removal clock as effectively unwaivable by private agreement, rejecting the argument that a courtesy extension to answer implicitly extended it.
“Agreements between parties cannot extend Section 1446(b)'s 30 day time limitation... Any unilateral reliance by defense counsel was unreasonable.”
On competing summary-judgment motions in a products-liability case, the judge let disputed expert testimony alone carry a claim past summary judgment, without independently weighing whose expert was more credible.
“This dispute over the details surrounding the hose assembly's manufacture and ultimate sale constitute a genuine issue of material facts precluding summary judgment on this count.”
In an oil-and-gas royalty case, the judge declined to treat the existence of a lease as automatically barring related tort claims. At the pleading stage, allegations of concealed deductions through affiliate sales were enough to keep fraud and conversion theories alive as potentially independent misconduct.
“the tortious conduct must be truly independent of the contractual relationship in order to survive dismissal. ... dismissing plaintiff’s claims simply because the parties’ relationship originated in contract would be inappropriate.”
Procedural preferences
When objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation are general and do not identify a specific error, the judge applies clear-error review rather than treating them as a basis for full de novo reconsideration.
“This Court finds that plaintiff has provided no objection which warrants de novo review of the R&R. A de novo review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge’s report accurately summarizes this case and the applicable law.”
In prisoner conditions-of-confinement suits, the judge enforces the PLRA's exhaustion requirement strictly: a plaintiff's own deposition testimony conceding he never appealed his grievances was enough to grant summary judgment for the defendants, even where some grievances went unanswered.
“Plaintiff's testimony demonstrates a failure to exhaust administrative remedies. ... Plaintiff testified that he did not appeal any of the grievances he filed.”
Cautions
Section 2241 habeas petitions that do not fit the narrow Fourth Circuit savings-clause test, or that are not the correct vehicle for the relief sought, are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction rather than reached on the merits: petitioners relying on a change in case law should confirm it actually altered the underlying conduct's criminality before filing.
“[T]he crimes for which petitioner was convicted remain criminal offenses; accordingly, he cannot satisfy the second prong of Jones.”
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“The Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 10) is hereby GRANTED, and this case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Upshur County.”
“Judgment -- Southwestern Energy Company, SWN Well Services, LLC, SWN Drilling Company, LLC, SWN Water Resources Company, LLC, and SWN Production Company, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 172] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.”
“Defendant JGB Enterprises, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 174] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.”
“the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [Doc. 19] is ADOPTED and petitioner's objections [Doc. 21] are OVERRULED. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment [Doc. 12] is GRANTED and petitioner's petition [Doc. 1] is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”
“the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant William Valentino (Doc. 4), the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant Frank Jezioro (Doc. 6), and the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Mike Pizzino, Howard Shinaberry, and Sean Duffield (Doc. 8) will be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The claims based upon the allegedly illegal searches set forth in paragraphs 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 13 are hereby DISMISSED.”
“the Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) or in the Alternative, Motion to Stay Pending Supreme Court Review [Doc. 71] is DENIED.”
“Defendant Todd A. Kruger's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 140] is hereby DENIED.”
“Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint [Doc. 104] is DENIED.”
“the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [Doc. 52[ is AFFIRMED, defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 46] is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”
“the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [Doc. 18] is hereby ORDERED ADOPTED for the reasons more fully stated in the magistrate judge's report. Petitioner's objections [Doc. 20] are OVERRULED. The Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 14] is GRANTED and the Petition [Doc. 1] is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”
“the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [Doc. 15] is ADOPTED, Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 8] is GRANTED and the Petition for Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc. 1] is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”
“the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 47} should be, and is, hereby ORDERED ADOPTED for the reasons more fully stated in the magistrate judge's report. Accordingly, this Court further ORDERS that plaintiffs Complaint [Doc. 1] be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”
“the pro se defendant's Letter construed as a Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [Crim. Doc. 81; Civil Doc. 1] and defendant's Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody [Doc. 88] are DENIED and DISMISSED as untimely.”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
- The sampled window includes a mix of personal-injury removals, prisoner civil-rights suits (many referred to Magistrate Judge James P.
- Mazzone), a pro se employment/APA suit against federal agencies, and a federal-agency Title VII enforcement action.
- The EEOC suit alleging a hostile work environment and retaliation against two restaurant-bar defendants proceeded through competing motions for judgment on the pleadings before resolving in a consent decree; the pro se suit against the Army and EEOC was dismissed for improper service and lack of jurisdiction after the plaintiff twice failed to obtain a default judgment.
Draft for Judge Bailey with the record in hand
Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Bailey, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Grounded in Judge Bailey's own signed orders
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace