Barbara Brandriff Crabb

United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin district Appointed by Jimmy Carter (Democratic) 19 signed orders read

How Judge Crabb decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Crabb found a sparse patent complaint sufficient when it provided fair notice of the asserted infringement theories.

“Although plaintiffs’ complaint is sparse, it meets the requirements for notice pleading of patent infringement.”

Crabb rejected a zoning damages claim where the record could not support a due-process deprivation.

“No reasonable jury could find that plaintiff was denied due process in his zoning dispute and, as a consequence, none could find that he was damaged.”

Procedural preferences

Crabb transfers disputes when another district is clearly more convenient and Wisconsin has no meaningful connection.

“when venue would be clearly more convenient in another district for at least one party and none of the parties have significant ties to Wisconsin, the practice of this court is to transfer.”

Crabb allowed joinder to cure a patent-standing problem instead of immediately ending the claim.

“Plaintiff EMD Crop Bioscience Canada Inc. is GRANTED leave to join patent co-owner McGill University as a necessary party under Fed.R.Civ.P. 19 to satisfy its standing requirement.”

Cautions

Crabb does not treat good-faith negotiation as requiring a party to surrender terms it regards as essential.

“The duty to apply one’s best efforts and negotiate in good faith does not require that parties concede particular provisions they believe to be essential to the bargain.”

Crabb granted qualified immunity where precedent had not clearly established a duty to provide inmate-led religious services without an outside leader.

“the law is not clearly established that the free exercise clause requires prison officials to hold religious services for prisoners if no qualified nonprisoners are available to lead the service.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Irby v. Sumnicht
· 2010-02-05
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted in part

“The motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Paul Sumnicht, Belinda Schrubbe and Cynthia Thorpe, dkt. #11, is GRANTED with respect to plaintiff Leon Irby’s claims under the Eighth Amendment and the Americans with Disabilities Act and his medical negligence claim against defendants Schrubbe and Thorpe.”

United States v. Murray
· 2009-09-29
Motion in limine (defendant) Denied

“defendant Fritz Murray’s motion in limine is DENIED”

Motion in limine (government) Granted

“the government’s motion in limine is GRANTED”

DENIL v. deBOER, INC.
· 2010-09-22
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“The motion for summary judgment, dkt. # 32, filed by defendants deBoer, Inc., deBoer Transportation Inc., deBoer Capital Associates Inc. and Ronald DeBoer is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Granted in part

“The motion for partial summary judgment, dkt. # 38, filed by plaintiffs Peter Denil and Gerald Nardella is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.”

Motion to exclude expert (defendants) Denied

“Defendants’ motion to exclude expert testimony, dkt. # 82, is DENIED as unnecessary.”

NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCIL v. Jackson
· 2009-07-23
Motion to lift stay (plaintiffs) Granted

“The motion to lift the stay as to count I of the complaint filed by plaintiffs National Pork Producers Council, Wisconsin Pork Association, Dairy Business Association, Inc., Babcock Genetics, Inc. and Maize-n-Bacon, Inc, dkt. # 53, is GRANTED.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant Lisa P. Jackson’s motion to dismiss, dkt. #49, is GRANTED as to count I of plaintiffs’ complaint because that claim is not justiciable.”

EMD Crop Bioscience Inc. v. Becker Underwood, Inc.
· 2010-10-29
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendant Becker Underwood Inc.’s motion to dismiss, dkt. # 9, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.”

Motion for leave to join (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff EMD Crop Bioscience Canada Inc. is GRANTED leave to join patent co-owner McGill University as a necessary party under Fed.R.Civ.P. 19 to satisfy its standing requirement.”

Acer Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
· 2008-04-09
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“plaintiffs’ claim for infringement of United States Patent No. 5,101,478 is GRANTED.”

Bettendorf v. St. Croix County
· 2010-01-15
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Denied

“the motion to dismiss filed by defendants St. Croix County and Wisconsin Municipal Mutual Insurance Company is DENIED”

Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.”

United States v. Holt
· 2009-12-10
Motion under 2255 (defendant) Denied

“defendant Jon Holt’s motion for vacation of his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED as untimely.”

Motion to proceed ifp (defendant) Moot / procedural

“defendant’s motion to proceed informa pauperis and his motion for appointment of counsel are DENIED as moot.”

Motion for appointment of counsel (defendant) Moot / procedural
Midrad, LLC v. Dane County, Wis.
· 2009-12-17
Motion to disregard reply arguments (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Plaintiff Midrad, LLC’s motion to disregard new arguments raised in defendant Town of Middleton’s reply brief, dkt. # 12, is DENIED as unnecessary.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant Town of Middleton’s motion to dismiss, dkt. # 4, is DENIED.”

Chicago Title Insurance v. Runkel Abstract & Title Co.
· 2009-07-14
Motion for clarification (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff Chicago Title Insurance Company’s motion for clarification of the April 6, 2009 order granting partial summary judgment, dkt. # 58, is GRANTED.”

Hoeft v. Kasten
· 2010-03-05
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“defendant Captain Michael Kasten’s motion for summary judgment, dkt. # 10, is GRANTED.”

Mountain Marketing Group, LLC v. Heimerl & Lammers, LLC
· 2014-03-27
Motions to transfer (defendant) Granted

“defendant Heim-erl & Lammers, LLC’s motion to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, dkt. # 10, is GRANTED.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss the case for lack of personal jurisdiction or improper venue is DENIED as moot.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The twenty returned cases were all terminated and spanned prisoner civil rights, Social Security, habeas and post-conviction review, contracts, employment, consumer credit, forfeiture, foreclosure, ERISA, patent, naturalization, and other statutory matters.

Put Judge Crabb's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Crabb actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Crabb's own signed orders and cites them.