Nicholas J. Ganjei

How Judge Ganjei rules, drawn from 5 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Position
district
Appointed by
Donald J. Trump (Republican)
Commissioned
2026-03-10
Education
American University, B.A., 2000; University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, J.D., 2005
Signed orders read
5

How Judge Ganjei decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In an immigration-detention habeas case, he treated the controlling circuit decision as resolving the statutory and constitutional challenges to mandatory detention for an applicant for admission during removal proceedings. A party seeking a different result would need to distinguish that binding posture rather than repeat the same due-process theory.

“This Court held that for aliens such as Petitioner, pre-removal-order detention is both demanded by the Immigration and Nationality Act and a constitutionally permissible part of the removal process.”

Procedural preferences

When reviewing a magistrate judge's dispositive recommendation, he conducts de novo review of specific objections but does not treat general, frivolous, or conclusory objections as requiring separate analysis. In the reviewed adoption orders, he compared the objections to the pleadings and governing law before adopting the recommendations.

“The district court need not consider general, frivolous, or conclusory objections to a Report and Recommendation.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Whiting v. NewRez
4:25-cv-05383 · 2026-06-03
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. All other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Rylander v. Frazier
4:25-cv-05323 · 2026-06-08
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendant Brent Coon’s Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice is GRANTED IN PART; Plaintiff’s claims against Brent Coon are DISMISSED WITHOJUT PREJUDICE.”

Cruz Perez v. Frink
4:26-cv-02142 · 2026-06-30
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“As such, Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and the Petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Summary judgment (respondents) Granted
Robinson v. Pilot Travel Centers LLC
4:26-cv-03336 · 2026-07-02
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Hicks v. McKinney
4:25-cv-04762 · 2026-08-04
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Doc. 43. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The early Houston calendar is heavily weighted toward immigration-detention habeas petitions, with additional employment, consumer-credit, insurance, trade-secret, real-property, contract, and prisoner civil-rights matters. Many matters were newly filed or inherited on commission and remained pending at the review date.

Draft for Judge Ganjei with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Ganjei, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Ganjei's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace