Dorina Ramos

How Judge Ramos rules, drawn from 4 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Ramos no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Position
magistrate
Status
Retired 2017
Served
1996–2017
Appointed by
Judges of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Commissioned
1996-08-26
Signed orders read
4

How Judge Ramos decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Ramos treated purposeful, direct recruiting activity in Texas as sufficient forum contact even when the employer's business and worksite were elsewhere.

“Once contacted by TWC, the Defendants relied on the services of TWC to facilitate Defendants’ in-state recruitment efforts and, specifically, to recruit and ultimately hire the Plaintiffs.”

In extradition proceedings, she treated reliable identity evidence as indispensable and denied certification when the respondent was demonstrably the wrong person.

“This is a textbook case of mistaken identity, and the governments of the U.S. and Mexico, in the interests of justice, ought to have conceded that fact.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In Re the Extradition of Cervantes Valles
number unavailable · 2003-03-31
Extradition request (government) Denied

“Having determined that the evidence proffered by the United Mexican States is insufficient, according to the laws of the United States, to justify committal for trial, the extradition request must be in all things DENIED.”

In Re Extradition of Munguia
number unavailable · 2003-11-18
Extradition request (government) Granted

“Having determined that Armando Munguia has validly agreed to be extradited to the United Mexican States, extradition should occur without further proceedings, and the United States of America shall take all measures under its laws to expedite the extradition.”

In Re the Extradition of Nava Gonzalez
number unavailable · 2004-01-08
Motion to abate extradition (respondent) Denied

“After the hearing had been adjourned, and having carefully studied the legal and factual issues, the undersigned denied Respondent’s motions to abate and dismiss this case.”

Motion to dismiss extradition (respondent) Denied
Extradition request (government) Granted

“Having determined that the evidence proffered by the United Mexican States is sufficient to sustain the charges in accordance with the applicable legal standards, the court determines that the present extradition request should be GRANTED in all things, and the undersigned hereby CERTIFIES the same to the Secretary of State of the United States of America.”

Guajardo v. Deanda
7:09-cv-00153 · 2010-02-10
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“As such, the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction is denied as to all the Defendants.”

Motion to change venue (defendant) Denied

“The Defendants’ Motion to Transfer Venue is denied for the reasons explained below.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The sampled civil matters include Social Security review, farmworker and wage litigation, insurance disputes, forfeiture, debt collection, and personal-injury cases. The sample was chosen to test historical and later text retention rather than to estimate the full docket mix.

A historical record

Judge Ramos no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.