Calvin Botley

How Judge Botley rules, drawn from 14 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Botley no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Position
magistrate
Status
Retired 2009
Served
1979–2009
Appointed by
Judges of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Commissioned
1979
Signed orders read
14

How Judge Botley decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Botley treated the failure to address another federal agency's disability rating as a legal error requiring remand rather than reweighing that evidence himself.

“the ALJ committed a legal error by failing to consider Welch’s VA disability rating.”

Procedural preferences

In the sanctions order, Botley distinguished an unsuccessful claim from sanctionable bad faith where the claimant genuinely believed a commission contract existed.

“Plaintiff actually believed that he had a valid contract for a commission. This is not the type of case contemplated by the statute and sanctions here are unwarranted.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Friesing v. Vandergrift
number unavailable · 1989-07-14
Motion for sanctions (defendant) Denied

“Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions is hereby DENIED.”

Spears v. Barnhart
number unavailable · 2002-03-28
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“It is, therefore, ORDERED that Spear’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Entry # 13) is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Further, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Entry # 15) is DENIED.”

Richardson ex rel. C.R. v. Barnhart
number unavailable · 2004-03-25
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Richardson’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 15) is DENIED”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 18) is GRANTED”

Welch v. Barnhart
number unavailable · 2004-06-04
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“ORDERED that Welch’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 22) is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“It is further ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 23) is DENIED.”

Mittag v. Barnhart
number unavailable · 2004-09-29
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“It is, therefore ORDERED that Mittag’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 19) be GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“It is further ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 21) be DENIED.”

Jones v. Barnhart
number unavailable · 2005-03-31
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Accordingly, it is therefore ORDERED that Jones’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 13) is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“It is further ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 17) is DENIED.”

Washington v. Barnhart
number unavailable · 2006-03-23
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“It is, therefore ORDERED that Washington’s First Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 24) is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“It is further ORDERED that Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 25) is GRANTED.”

Woods v. Barnhart
number unavailable · 2006-09-05
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“ORDERED that Plaintiff Larry S. Woods’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 8) is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“It is further ORDERED that the Defendant Jo Anne B. Barnhart’s, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 9) is DENIED.”

Lewis v. Barnhart
number unavailable · 2006-09-26
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“ORDERED that Lewis’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 18) is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“It is further ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 22) is GRANTED.”

Holiday v. Barnhart
number unavailable · 2006-09-29
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“ORDERED Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 14) be GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“It is further ORDERED that the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 16) be DENIED.”

Hassbrock v. Barnhart
number unavailable · 2006-09-29
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Accordingly, it is therefore ORDERED that Hassbrock’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 13) is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“It is further ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 16) is DENIED.”

Hawthorne v. Astrue
number unavailable · 2007-03-19
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Accordingly, it is therefore ORDERED that Hawthorne’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 13) is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“It is further ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 14) is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The 20 returned assigned matters included civil-rights, contract, insurance, personal-injury, and other civil cases. Empty sampled entry streams and a narrow historical window do not support a reliable duration or subject-matter percentage.

A historical record

Judge Botley no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.