William B. Washabaugh Jr.

How Judge Washabaugh rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Washabaugh no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Deceased
Served
1959–1988
Commissioned
1959-07-20
Education
Princeton University, B.A., 1927; University of Pittsburgh School of Law, J.D., 1930
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Washabaugh decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Transfers to controlling insiders received close scrutiny, particularly where they exhausted company funds while other creditors went unpaid.

“Transactions between a debtor-corporation and its controlling officers must be scrutinized.”

Procedural preferences

A properly addressed and mailed court notice carried a strong presumption of receipt that general nonreceipt assertions did not overcome.

“The presumption that the addressee of properly addressed mail received the same in due course is virtually irrebutable”

Cautions

Belated lien-avoidance requests risked denial when creditors had reasonably relied on a closed case and incurred enforcement costs.

“when not applied for with reasonable promptness secured creditors are entitled to assume their secured status is not subject to further disruption”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Seneca Trails, Inc. v. Snyder (In re Seneca Trails, Inc.)
· 1980-11-20
Summary judgment (Elmer R. Hallstrom) Granted

“The motions of third-party defendants Elmer R. Hallstrom, Sturgeon Engineering, Inc., R. H. Sieminski & Co., Inc., Interstate Amiesite Corporation and James H. Ferg t/d/b/a Hinkel Plumbing and Heating Company for summary judgment and for dismissal of the third-party complaints against them are granted”

Summary judgment (Sturgeon Engineering, Inc.) Granted
Summary judgment (R. H. Sieminski & Co., Inc.) Granted
Summary judgment (Interstate Amiesite Corporation) Granted
Summary judgment (James H. Ferg doing business as Hinkel Plumbing and Heating Company) Granted
Matter of Stubenhofer
· 1983-07-14
Complaint to determine exemption and lien (Gerald and Ann Marie Stubenhofer) Granted in part

“the rights of the debtors in the subject liquor license are subject to their claim for exemption under 11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(5) subject to the above mentioned powers of regulation of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania free and clear of any security interest of the defendants”

Serafini v. Union Bank & Trust Co. (In re Serafini)
· 1983-04-28
Motion to reopen bankruptcy case (The debtor) Denied

“the debtor’s petition to reopen the case a second time for the scheduling of hearings on his complaint to avoid the lien of the Union Bank’s Charging Order ... should be denied”

Complaint to avoid lien (The debtor) Denied

“MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REFUSING TO REOPEN CLOSED CASE TO AVOID LIENS AND DENYING COMPLAINT THEREFOR”

Sementelli v. Stagedoor, Inc. (In re Stagedoor, Inc.)
· 1983-06-29
Motion for relief from automatic stay (The landlord) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Complaint for relief from stay and for possession of the premises at 1015 State Street, Erie, Pennsylvania be, and the same hereby is, granted”

Dwyer v. Jones (In re Tri-State Paving, Inc.)
· 1982-08-20
Complaint to avoid fraudulent transfer (The trustee) Granted

“It follows that judgment should be entered in favor of the plaintiff against the defendants in the sum of the withdrawn funds of $20,261.00”

Complaint to determine dischargeability (The trustee) Granted

“their obligation to pay said judgment to the trustee of the corporate-debtor should be held non-dis-chargeable”

Caylor v. Moss (In re Caylor)
· 1983-07-14
Complaint to determine exemption and lien (The debtors) Granted in part

“the rights of the debtors in the subject liquor license are subject to their claim for exemption under 11 U.S.C. 522(d)(5) ... free and clear of any security interest or levy thereunder”

Barnett v. Commodore Consumer Discount Co. (In re Barnett)
· 1981-09-23
Motion to avoid lien (The debtor) Granted

“the prayer of the foregoing Complaint, be, and the same hereby is, granted in respect to the lien of Commodore Consumer Discount Company”

Security Peoples Trust Co. v. Elia (In re Elia)
· 1982-02-08
Motion for relief from automatic stay (Security Peoples Trust Company) Granted

“the automatic stay provided by Section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code of 1978 be, and the same hereby is, vacated and terminated”

Zacherl v. Zacherl Coal Co. (In re Zacherl Coal Co.)
· 1981-07-14
Motions to dismiss (The trustee) Granted

“the Motion of the trustee to dismiss the Plaintiff’s Complaint for release and recon-veyance of the lease dated July 16,1976 and the unmined coal on the leased premises is granted”

Marine Bank v. Sigma-4 Express, Inc. (In re Sigma-4 Express, Inc.)
· 1983-01-24
Complaint for relief from stay and return security (Marine Bank) Granted in part

“the trustee shall pay said bank the additional sum of $4,022.06 from the debtor’s post-petition collections ... and that the balance of said funds shall be retained by the trustee as property of the estate”

Wagner v. Glacial Holding, Inc. (In re Wagner)
· 1983-01-28
Request for turnover of royalties (First National Bank of Fryburg) Granted

“the Glacial Coal Company, in-tervenor, shall pay the accumulated royalties and sums it is holding in escrow ... to the First National Bank of Fryburg”

Dewyer v. Union Bank (In re Dewyer)
· 1981-01-19
Motion to avoid lien (The debtors) Granted

“said premises are hereby released from the lien of the judgment of the Union Bank”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No assigned historical case was returned, so no caseload or duration sample could be formed.

A historical record

Judge Washabaugh no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.