Judith K. Fitzgerald

How Judge Fitzgerald rules, drawn from 19 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Fitzgerald no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 2013
Served
1987–2013
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Commissioned
1987-10-30
Signed orders read
19

How Judge Fitzgerald decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

The court treated the governing transaction documents as controlling when they did not grant the separate secured interest a creditor asserted.

“There is nothing in the documents that give Madison a security interest or lien with respect to Debtor’s property.”

Procedural preferences

Counsel remained responsible for monitoring the docket, and delayed awareness of an entered order did not establish excusable neglect.

“Mr. Getty’s failure to ‘see’ the Memorandum Opinion and Order until twelve days after it was issued is not the standard.”

Cautions

Fee applications were reduced when the record showed unnecessary work, duplicative plan activity, or inadequate billing detail.

“Therefore, for the reasons above stated, we will not approve the entire additional fee as requested.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Berkebile v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (In Re Berkebile)
· 2011-02-17
Summary judgment (Timothy Berkebile) Granted in part

“The Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART as to the legal determination that: a. under § 506(a), the Debtor may seek to value the secured claim of the IRS; and b. under § 506(d), the lien as to any unsecured portion thereof will be void against only the Bethel Park Property at issue herein. The Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED IN PART as to the determination of the allowed secured claim of the IRS”

Winnecour v. Taylor (In Re Taylor)
· 2011-02-18
Motion to abstain (Carole Taylor) Denied

“Wherefore, the Motions to Abstain are DENIED.”

Motion to abstain (Collette Michelle Taylor and TOLATR Highland Park Preparatory Academy) Denied
Taylor v. Winnecour (In Re Taylor)
· 2011-04-29
Motions to dismiss (Carole Taylor) Denied

“AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2011, for the reasons expressed in the foregoing Memorandum Opinion of even date, it is ORDERED that Debtor’s MOTION TO DISMISS her bankruptcy case is DENIED.”

Iannini v. City Residential Lending (In Re Iannini)
· 2011-12-14
Application for compensation and expenses (Debtor's counsel) Granted in part

“Based on the foregoing and the amended fee application filed by counsel on September 8, 2011 at Doc. No. 143, we will allow fees in the total amount of $9,228.75. We also allow expenses in the total amount of $1,016.31.”

Washington v. Saxon Mortgage Services (In Re Washington)
· 2012-03-07
Motions to dismiss (Deutsche Bank National Trust Company) Granted

“AND NOW, this 7th day of March, 2012, for the reasons expressed in the foregoing Memorandum Opinion of even date, it is ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed on behalf of Deutsche Bank is GRANTED. The Complaint is Dismissed with prejudice.”

Taylor v. Winnecour (In Re Taylor)
· 2011-06-20
Motion for stay pending appeal (Carole Taylor) Denied

“For all of these reasons, the court finds that Debtor has not met her burden. Thus, the motion is DENIED.”

West v. America's Servicing Co. (In Re West)
· 2009-11-19
Summary judgment (America's Servicing Company) Granted

“for the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum Opinion, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and the Complaint is dismissed.”

In Re Pittsburgh Corning Corp.
· 2011-06-16
Request for plan confirmation (The plan proponents and plan supporters) Denied

“it is hereby ORDERED that the Plan Proponents’ and Plan Supporters’ request for confirmation of the ‘Modified Third Amended Plan of Reorganization for Pittsburgh Corning Corporation Dated January 29, 2009 Jointly Proposed by Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, the Official Committee of Asbestos Creditors and the Future Claimants’ Representative’ is DENIED.”

Hammond v. Allegheny County Treasurer (In Re Hammond)
· 2009-12-15
Adversary complaint to determine secured status and redeem property (The debtor) Granted

“AND NOW this 15th day of December, 2009, for the reasons expressed in the foregoing Memorandum Opinion, it is ORDERED that Debtor may redeem the real property sold at tax sale through her Chapter 13 plan for the amount of the taxes paid by GLS.”

Madison Investment Trust v. Covenant at South Hills, Inc. (In Re Covenant at South Hills, Inc.)
· 2009-09-03
Request to determine separate first priority lien (Madison Investment Trust) Denied

“Madison has no separate first priority lien independent of the Trustee’s and is entitled only to assert its beneficial interest.”

Lansaw v. Zokaites (In Re Lansaw)
· 2010-02-25
Supplemental motion for summary judgment (Frank R. Zokaites) Denied

“AND NOW, this 25th day of February, 2010, for the reasons expressed in the foregoing Memorandum Opinion, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Frank R. Zokaites’ Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.”

Wilson v. DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas, LLC (In Re Wilson)
· 2009-07-30
Motions to dismiss (DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas, LLC) Granted

“AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2009, for the reasons expressed in the foregoing Memorandum Opinion, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss is granted and the Complaint is DISMISSED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

All five sampled matters were terminated, and none retained a docket-entry stream.

A historical record

Judge Fitzgerald no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.