Joseph L. Cosetti

How Judge Cosetti rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Cosetti no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Position
bankruptcy
Status
No longer serving
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Cosetti decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

The court favored the statutory reading that preserved an independent limitations period for a newly appointed trustee after conversion.

“The first interpretation appears to this court to be the correct view because it more closely follows the plain meaning of the statute.”

Procedural preferences

Filing deadlines and local claim procedures were enforced even when another pleading described the debt.

“Because local rules reflect important policy considerations and are equivalent to court orders in that compliance is required, the requirements of Local Rule 3002.1.D cannot be defeated by the application of the informal proof of claim doctrine.”

Cautions

Notice rulings tied to unusual facts were not presented as mechanical rules for other cases.

“The case at bar, while not unique, is somewhat atypical in its facts and as a result, this court’s holding is fact specific.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Integra Bank v. Sixta (In Re Smith)
· 1996-02-08
Petition to mark judgment satisfied (Eleanor C.K. Smith) Denied

“For the reasons expressed below, the requests shall be denied.”

Petition for liquidated damages (Eleanor C.K. Smith) Denied
Belculfine v. Aloe (In Re Shenango Group, Inc.)
· 1995-08-23
Summary judgment (Andrew Aloe and Mark A. Aloe) Granted

“the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Andrew Aloe and Mark A. Aloe and the motion for summary judgment filed by Third Party Defendant Shenango Incorporated shall be granted.”

Summary judgment (Shenango Incorporated) Granted
Summary judgment (The plaintiffs) Denied

“Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiffs at the district court which was referred to the bankruptcy court as well as the second motion filed in this court are denied.”

Summary judgment (The plaintiffs) Denied
Associates Consumer Discount Co. v. Kriger (In Re Kriger)
· 1994-06-09
Motion for relief from automatic stay (Associates Consumer Discount Company) Denied

“Relief from the automatic stay is denied at this time.”

Pineo v. Reeves Bank (In Re Arthur F. Hazen & Co.)
· 1995-07-11
Motions to dismiss (Reeves Bank) Denied

“Reeves’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted is denied.”

Rishel v. Rishel
· 1994-04-20
Request to charge attorney fees against coowner sale proceeds (The debtor) Denied

“Therefore, co-owners of the Debtor’s real property sold pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 363(h) are not required to pay a pro-rata share of the Debt- or’s attorneys’ fees.”

Grubb v. Pittsburgh National Bank (In Re Grubb)
· 1994-07-25
Debtor objection to claim (Gary and Atleah Grubb) Granted

“For the reasons stated below the objection is sustained and the claim of PNC is disallowed.”

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Metalsource Corp. v. U.S. Metalsource Corp. (In Re U.S. Metalsource Corp.)
· 1993-12-21
Motion to modify wage order (The Committee of Unsecured Creditors) Denied

“The Committee’s motion for an order (i) modifying the first day interlocutory wage order insofar as it relates to severance benefits and vacation pay and (ii) authorizing the Committee to bring suit in the name of the Debtor to recover excess severance payments is denied.”

Request for authority to recover excess severance payments (The Committee of Unsecured Creditors) Denied
Request to amend prospective vacation pay policy (The Committee of Unsecured Creditors) Granted

“Because no party has expressly objected to this request, it will be granted”

Jones v. Chemetron Corp. (In Re Allegheny International, Inc.)
· 1993-07-26
Motion to allow late claim (The plaintiffs) Granted

“The Plaintiffs’ motion to file a late claim is granted.”

Adversary complaint to declare claims nondischarged (The plaintiffs) Moot / procedural

“the Plaintiffs’ adversary complaint to declare that Plaintiffs’ claims are not discharged and Chemetron’s counterclaim are dismissed without prejudice.”

Counterclaim for injunction (Chemetron Corporation) Moot / procedural
Sua sponte relief from automatic stay (The court for the plaintiffs) Granted

“Finally, the court grants the Plaintiffs relief from the automatic stay sua sponte.”

DeSarno v. County of Allegheny
· 1994-05-13
Request to modify postpetition tax interest (The debtors) Granted

“ORDERED that pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(2), the Debtors may properly modify the postpetition claims of Allegheny County, the Municipality of Penn Hill and the School District of Penn Hills (collectively ‘Claimants’).”

Penn Center Management Corp. v. Ultimate Restaurant Group, Inc. (In Re Ultimate Restaurant Group, Inc.)
· 1992-06-30
Motion to compel transfer of liquor license (Penn Center Management Corporation) Denied

“Penn Center’s motion to compel transfer of the liquor license is denied.”

Request for setoff (Penn Center Management Corporation) Denied

“Penn Center does not have a security interest in the Pennsylvania liquor license, nor does it have rights to specific performance and set-off as a result of the Trustee’s rejection of the Lease Agreement.”

Request for administrative rent claim (Penn Center Management Corporation) Granted

“Penn Center is entitled to an administrative claim in accordance with 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1) for rent payments defaulted upon after the Lease Agreement was assumed during the Chapter 11 case.”

Al Tech Specialty Steel Corp. v. Allegheny International, Inc. (In Re Allegheny International, Inc.)
· 1993-07-30
Claim for environmental contribution (AL Tech Specialty Steel Corporation) Denied

“AL Tech’s claim is disallowed.”

Moore v. Internal Revenue Service
· 1991-07-25
Debtor objection to tax claim (William and Jean Moore) Denied

“The debtors’ objection is denied and the claim of the Internal Revenue Service is granted in the amount of $35,538.68.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

All five sampled matters were terminated, and none retained a docket-entry stream.

A historical record

Judge Cosetti no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.